Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Re-pointed link to OTHER new disambiguated page (Wiki Word styling is pending)
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
** The story begins with a FanGame called ''[[https://evilempire.itch.io/supervhs Super VHS]]'' which lovingly re-creates the warehouse "floor" area of the RLM studio in Milwaukee, inviting the player to collect all of the VHS tapes strewn about the sets: Plinkett's house and the VCR repair shop from ''WebVideo/HalfInTheBag''; the discussion table and Plinketto board from ''WebVideo/BestOfTheWorst''; and the studio workshop where the ''WebVideo/ReView'' backdrop is stored (along with props from ''Film/SpaceCop'' and ''WebVideo/PreviouslyRecorded''). The game was released as a free download on August 7, 2022, after over a year of development.
to:
** The story begins with a FanGame called ''[[https://evilempire.itch.io/supervhs Super VHS]]'' which lovingly re-creates the warehouse "floor" area of the RLM studio in Milwaukee, inviting the player to collect all of the VHS tapes strewn about the sets: Plinkett's house and the VCR repair shop from ''WebVideo/HalfInTheBag''; the discussion table and Plinketto board from ''WebVideo/BestOfTheWorst''; and the studio workshop where the ''WebVideo/ReView'' ''[[WebVideo/ReViewRedLetterMedia re:View]]'' backdrop is stored (along with props from ''Film/SpaceCop'' and ''WebVideo/PreviouslyRecorded''). The game was released as a free download on August 7, 2022, after over a year of development.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed link to new disambiguated page (Wiki Word styling is pending)
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* [[Heartwarming/{{reView}} re:View]]
to:
* [[Heartwarming/{{reView}} [[Heartwarming/ReViewRedLetterMedia re:View]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLpxYMgQUT4 Displaying Our Exploded USS Enterprise D]]'' highlights the studio's acquisition of the remnants of an Enterprise D model that was used for a destruction scene in ''[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/StarTrekTheNextGenerationS5E18CauseAndEffect Cause and Effect]]'' and attempts to properly preserve and display it. While there have been many instances over the years of Mike and the rest being terrible stewards of the ''[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Franchise/Gremlins Gremlins]]'' props that they came into possession of (with the video even acknowledging that), the video shows Mike and Rich's care, effort, and improvisational skill in figuring out a display that can be done.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Whenever ''anything'' happens in-game, Mike ''immediately'' glances over at Rich to get his reaction. Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.
to:
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Whenever ''anything'' happens in-game, Mike ''immediately'' glances over at Rich to get his reaction. reaction, even though he's set up a camera to record them for posterity, and his eagerness is positively charming. Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.LetsPlay.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.
to:
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Whenever ''anything'' happens in-game, Mike ''immediately'' glances over at Rich to get his reaction. Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** In addition to the praise in the description, Rich and Mike both continuously express amazement at how accurate the re-creation is, apart from being both cleaner and less cluttered than the real studio. They jokingly mock the designer for staging the Re:View backdrop in the workshop, but Jay defends this as an "artistic interpretation".[[note]]It's unclear whether Jay read the note where the designer correctly acknowledges, as Mike points out, that the Re:View set is in fact a re-dress of the [=BotW=] set.[[/note]]
to:
** In addition to the praise in the description, Rich and Mike both continuously express amazement at how accurate the re-creation is, apart from being both cleaner and less cluttered than the real studio. They jokingly mock the designer for staging the Re:View backdrop in the workshop, but Jay defends this as an "artistic interpretation"."taking artistic liberty".[[note]]It's unclear whether Jay read the note where the designer correctly acknowledges, as Mike points out, that the Re:View set is in fact a re-dress of the [=BotW=] set.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12R2V3kkhFA Rich and Mike play Super VHS: The RLM Video Game!]]'' might be the single most heartwarming video in the entire online history of RLM:
** The story begins with a FanGame called ''[[https://evilempire.itch.io/supervhs Super VHS]]'' which lovingly re-creates the warehouse "floor" area of the RLM studio in Milwaukee, inviting the player to collect all of the VHS tapes strewn about the sets: Plinkett's house and the VCR repair shop from ''WebVideo/HalfInTheBag''; the discussion table and Plinketto board from ''WebVideo/BestOfTheWorst''; and the studio workshop where the ''WebVideo/ReView'' backdrop is stored (along with props from ''Film/SpaceCop'' and ''WebVideo/PreviouslyRecorded''). The game was released as a free download on August 7, 2022, after over a year of development.
** Although the creator posted about the game to [=YouTube=], Reddit, and Twitter, it was a big surprise when the boys -- who are notoriously aloof from their fanbase -- actually ''noticed'' the game and Mike (who runs the official RLM Twitter) retweeted the link. This unexpected magnanimous gesture, surely, was more than anyone could have hoped for. In the coming days, WebVideo/RalphTheMovieMaker and Vinny from WebVideo/{{Vinesauce}}, both acknowledged fans of RLM, posted LetsPlays of the game, praising it as a heartfelt tribute from an obvious fan.
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.
** The video description says it all:
---> Seemingly out of nowhere comes a strange video game that takes place in the RLM studio. Normally we don't give attention to weirdos that take this much effort making something so utterly creepy, but this game is just so impressive, Rich and Mike had to play it and see what all the fuss was about.
** In addition to the praise in the description, Rich and Mike both continuously express amazement at how accurate the re-creation is, apart from being both cleaner and less cluttered than the real studio. They jokingly mock the designer for staging the Re:View backdrop in the workshop, but Jay defends this as an "artistic interpretation".[[note]]It's unclear whether Jay read the note where the designer correctly acknowledges, as Mike points out, that the Re:View set is in fact a re-dress of the [=BotW=] set.[[/note]]
** Rich and especially Mike seem genuinely tickled by the many deep-cut references to RLM lore. Their joyful enthusiasm is both endearing and infectious: several commenters have noted both that it's refreshing to see Mike so happy, and that both of them are reacting with the wonderment of small children. They both laugh hard at the Body Rap box (with Colin from Canada photoshopped onto the cover), Mike is delighted to see the acetone and the giant flask, and Rich even grudgingly admits the mistake he made when he finds the TUMS bottle... something he never actually did on ''Best of the Worst''. At first Rich dreads the famous "Dick the Birthday Boy" polaroid, but both he and Mike laugh heartily at the description saying that this "mysterious artifact" made Creator/JuliaRoberts a superstar and destroyed Creator/EllenDeGeneres's career.
** When reading the creator's charitable description of ''Film/SpaceCop'' as an intentional comedy that should be appreciated on its own terms because movies are hard, Mike attempts to gracefully accept this compliment but Rich is having none of it, pointing out that they themselves are ruthless enough in critiquing others and that ''Space Cop'' doesn't deserve to be immune.
** Rich does manage to collect all 50 tapes, and when he unlocks the Space Cop laser gun, he takes a perverse joy in [[TrashTheSet destroying the set]] with it... probably the first time he ever gets to do so without having to clean it up afterwards.
** Mike applauds Rich for collecting all 50 tapes, and once the game crashes after Rich's rampage with the laser gun, both of them applaud the game's creator for a job well done. Although they didn't reach the "true ending"[[note]]You're supposed to use the gun to break the lock on the exit door, and retrieve the ''Series/NightCourt'' tape from the dense Milwaukee snow, and bring it to Plinkett's TV to "win" the game[[/note]], the game's creator even acknowledged the crash as the next-best possible ending.
** The story begins with a FanGame called ''[[https://evilempire.itch.io/supervhs Super VHS]]'' which lovingly re-creates the warehouse "floor" area of the RLM studio in Milwaukee, inviting the player to collect all of the VHS tapes strewn about the sets: Plinkett's house and the VCR repair shop from ''WebVideo/HalfInTheBag''; the discussion table and Plinketto board from ''WebVideo/BestOfTheWorst''; and the studio workshop where the ''WebVideo/ReView'' backdrop is stored (along with props from ''Film/SpaceCop'' and ''WebVideo/PreviouslyRecorded''). The game was released as a free download on August 7, 2022, after over a year of development.
** Although the creator posted about the game to [=YouTube=], Reddit, and Twitter, it was a big surprise when the boys -- who are notoriously aloof from their fanbase -- actually ''noticed'' the game and Mike (who runs the official RLM Twitter) retweeted the link. This unexpected magnanimous gesture, surely, was more than anyone could have hoped for. In the coming days, WebVideo/RalphTheMovieMaker and Vinny from WebVideo/{{Vinesauce}}, both acknowledged fans of RLM, posted LetsPlays of the game, praising it as a heartfelt tribute from an obvious fan.
** But the ''big'' shock was an actual upload on the official RLM [=YouTube=] channel the morning of August 13, 2022 featuring Rich playing the game blind, as due to his lack of social media presence he knew nothing about it, and Mike wanted to capture his reaction on camera as he experienced it for the first time (a fun, and ''much'' more wholesome, riff on their classic "Rich Evans Reacts To" series). Jay, who is off-camera, has played the game already, and advises Rich on what to do throughout the LP.
** The video description says it all:
---> Seemingly out of nowhere comes a strange video game that takes place in the RLM studio. Normally we don't give attention to weirdos that take this much effort making something so utterly creepy, but this game is just so impressive, Rich and Mike had to play it and see what all the fuss was about.
** In addition to the praise in the description, Rich and Mike both continuously express amazement at how accurate the re-creation is, apart from being both cleaner and less cluttered than the real studio. They jokingly mock the designer for staging the Re:View backdrop in the workshop, but Jay defends this as an "artistic interpretation".[[note]]It's unclear whether Jay read the note where the designer correctly acknowledges, as Mike points out, that the Re:View set is in fact a re-dress of the [=BotW=] set.[[/note]]
** Rich and especially Mike seem genuinely tickled by the many deep-cut references to RLM lore. Their joyful enthusiasm is both endearing and infectious: several commenters have noted both that it's refreshing to see Mike so happy, and that both of them are reacting with the wonderment of small children. They both laugh hard at the Body Rap box (with Colin from Canada photoshopped onto the cover), Mike is delighted to see the acetone and the giant flask, and Rich even grudgingly admits the mistake he made when he finds the TUMS bottle... something he never actually did on ''Best of the Worst''. At first Rich dreads the famous "Dick the Birthday Boy" polaroid, but both he and Mike laugh heartily at the description saying that this "mysterious artifact" made Creator/JuliaRoberts a superstar and destroyed Creator/EllenDeGeneres's career.
** When reading the creator's charitable description of ''Film/SpaceCop'' as an intentional comedy that should be appreciated on its own terms because movies are hard, Mike attempts to gracefully accept this compliment but Rich is having none of it, pointing out that they themselves are ruthless enough in critiquing others and that ''Space Cop'' doesn't deserve to be immune.
** Rich does manage to collect all 50 tapes, and when he unlocks the Space Cop laser gun, he takes a perverse joy in [[TrashTheSet destroying the set]] with it... probably the first time he ever gets to do so without having to clean it up afterwards.
** Mike applauds Rich for collecting all 50 tapes, and once the game crashes after Rich's rampage with the laser gun, both of them applaud the game's creator for a job well done. Although they didn't reach the "true ending"[[note]]You're supposed to use the gun to break the lock on the exit door, and retrieve the ''Series/NightCourt'' tape from the dense Milwaukee snow, and bring it to Plinkett's TV to "win" the game[[/note]], the game's creator even acknowledged the crash as the next-best possible ending.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* Heartwarming/MisterPlinkettReviews
Deleted line(s) 5,12 (click to see context) :
[[WMG: Mr. Plinkett Reviews]]
* How is it possible that a 119 year old serial killer manages to make the ends of all of his ''Star Wars'' prequel reviews heartwarming? Because Plinkett comes across shockingly as a humanist, pleading for films that aren't cold, technological, cynical grabs at money, but films that embrace characters, emotions and story.
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, the lousy dialog, but generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, and they left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is just so many moments and images that resonate all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
** Plinkett telling people to leave Creator/HaydenChristensen alone, stating that the guy worked as best as he could with what he was given.
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
to:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
to:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy and who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and friendly guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
to:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and friendly jovial guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports appears to be quite a nice and friendly guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
to:
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and friendly guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.do.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
to:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]].""
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports appears to be quite a nice and friendly guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports appears to be quite a nice and friendly guy and was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* Heartwarming/{{reView}}
to:
* Heartwarming/{{reView}}
[[Heartwarming/{{reView}} re:View]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Heartwarming/{{reView}}
Changed line(s) 10,13 (click to see context) from:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
[[WMG: re:View]]
* The ''re:View'' of ''Film/{{Martin}}'' ends with a tribute to the recently deceased Creator/GeorgeARomero, with a montage of his films.
[[WMG: re:View]]
* The ''re:View'' of ''Film/{{Martin}}'' ends with a tribute to the recently deceased Creator/GeorgeARomero, with a montage of his films.
to:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
[[WMG: re:View]]
* The ''re:View'' of ''Film/{{Martin}}'' ends with a tribute to the recently deceased Creator/GeorgeARomero, with a montage of his films."
[[WMG: re:View]]
* The ''re:View'' of ''Film/{{Martin}}'' ends with a tribute to the recently deceased Creator/GeorgeARomero, with a montage of his films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
to:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact."]]
to:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact."]]
fact]]."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''RevengeOfTheSith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, the lousy dialog, but generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, and they left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is just so many moments and images that resonate all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
to:
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''RevengeOfTheSith'' ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, the lousy dialog, but generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, and they left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is just so many moments and images that resonate all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film.
to:
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice, in fact."]]
to:
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment controversial]] Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice, nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original film, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film.
to:
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original film, movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film.
