Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* While the sequel has Wayne Robson's gas station attendant character as a relative/accomplice of the hillkillers, in this film, when he sees their truck headed back to his service station, he runs inside and hunkers down, implying that he knows about them, but isn't exactly their ally. Does this fall under FanonDiscontinuity, the gas station owner and the old-timer form the second movie being different characters despite their shared actor, or simply that branch of the family being too crazy or mean even for him?
to:
* While the sequel has Wayne Robson's gas station attendant character as a relative/accomplice of the hillkillers, in this film, when he sees their truck headed back to his service station, he runs inside and hunkers down, implying that he knows about them, but isn't exactly their ally. Does this fall under FanonDiscontinuity, CanonDiscontinuity, the gas station owner and the old-timer form the second movie being different characters despite their shared actor, or simply that branch of the family being too crazy or mean even for him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Pretty sure killing dozens upon dozens of people, including police officers, would be enough to draw attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
*** Well, they can do things like drive and make a deal with the creepy gas station guy...
to:
*** Well, they can do things like drive and make a deal with the creepy gas station guy...guy...
* While the sequel has Wayne Robson's gas station attendant character as a relative/accomplice of the hillkillers, in this film, when he sees their truck headed back to his service station, he runs inside and hunkers down, implying that he knows about them, but isn't exactly their ally. Does this fall under FanonDiscontinuity, the gas station owner and the old-timer form the second movie being different characters despite their shared actor, or simply that branch of the family being too crazy or mean even for him?
* While the sequel has Wayne Robson's gas station attendant character as a relative/accomplice of the hillkillers, in this film, when he sees their truck headed back to his service station, he runs inside and hunkers down, implying that he knows about them, but isn't exactly their ally. Does this fall under FanonDiscontinuity, the gas station owner and the old-timer form the second movie being different characters despite their shared actor, or simply that branch of the family being too crazy or mean even for him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off ''Franchise/TheTexasChainsawMassacre'' way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
to:
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off ''Franchise/TheTexasChainsawMassacre'' ''Film/TheTexasChainsawMassacre'' way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of ''Film/TheHillsHaveEyes''?
to:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of ''Film/TheHillsHaveEyes''?''[[Film/TheHillsHaveEyes1977 The Hills Have Eyes]]''?
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
*** Well, they can do things like drive and make a deal with the creepy gas station guy...
to:
*** Well, they can do things like drive and make a deal with the creepy gas station guy...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 7,10 (click to see context) :
* ''Wrong Turn 3'' - An armored car full of money is found abandoned in the forest. An abandoned armored car? Full of money? Really?
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?
** If you were an imprisoned psycho who has just sparked a riot, who would you be more likely to target, your jailers, or fellow captives (most of whom looked to be just as messed up as them)?
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?
** If you were an imprisoned psycho who has just sparked a riot, who would you be more likely to target, your jailers, or fellow captives (most of whom looked to be just as messed up as them)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?
to:
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?killed?
** If you were an imprisoned psycho who has just sparked a riot, who would you be more likely to target, your jailers, or fellow captives (most of whom looked to be just as messed up as them)?
** If you were an imprisoned psycho who has just sparked a riot, who would you be more likely to target, your jailers, or fellow captives (most of whom looked to be just as messed up as them)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?
to:
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?indication?
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?
* In ''Bloody Beginnings'' why did the hillbillies single out the asylum employees to torture and kill when there were tons of fellow inmates they could have killed?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 7 (click to see context) :
**** And don't forget [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Phelous INBRED PERFECT AIM]]!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off ''Film/TheTexasChainsawMassacre''way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
to:
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off ''Film/TheTexasChainsawMassacre''way ''Franchise/TheTexasChainsawMassacre'' way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of TheHillsHaveEyes?
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off TheTexasChainsawMassacre way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off TheTexasChainsawMassacre way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
to:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of TheHillsHaveEyes?
''Film/TheHillsHaveEyes''?
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping offTheTexasChainsawMassacre way ''Film/TheTexasChainsawMassacre''way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* Wrong Turn 3 - An armored car full of money is found abandoned in the forest. An abandoned armored car? Full of money? Really?
to:
* Wrong ''Wrong Turn 3 3'' - An armored car full of money is found abandoned in the forest. An abandoned armored car? Full of money? Really?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of HillsHaveEyes?
to:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of HillsHaveEyes?TheHillsHaveEyes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Oh come on, that's not fair at all! They're ripping off TheTexasChainsawMassacre way more! (seriously, the second movie even has a blatant copycat of the dinner scene from TCM)
Added DiffLines:
**** And don't forget [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Phelous INBRED PERFECT AIM]]!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* I am the only one who noticed that this is a rip-off of HillsHaveEyes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Well, they can do things like drive and make a deal with the creepy gas station guy...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* Wrong Turn 3 - An armored car full of money is found abandoned in the forest.An abandoned armored car? Full of money? Really?
to:
* Wrong Turn 3 - An armored car full of money is found abandoned in the forest. An abandoned armored car? Full of money? Really?Really?
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?
** Wasn't it obvious that the people inside were killed by Three Finger (or, judging by the rust, Three Finger, One-Eye, and Saw Tooth), then dragged off? Or was the blood and the windshield being broken INWARDS not a clear enough indication?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** They probably don't eat anyone living nearby so as not to draw attention to themselves.
