Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TheLegendOfKorraEqualists

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The argument that the Equalists are right forgets one thing: Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict whatever point they have. They want to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Even before that, they've done stuff like: Attacking non-benders who aren't with them (e.g. electrocuting Shiro), sabotaging the city and tying up emergency services (what happens if someone has a medical emergency and can't access medical services, or if criminals take advantage of the chaos to commit crimes?), trying to blow up a stadium full of innocents, kidnapping and de-bending innocent benders, and the crowner: ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending, '''to the point where it was rendered near-extinct via genocide less than two centuries ago'''''. In other words, what is '''effectively a second attempt at genocide'''. Amon is also explicitly stated to have been driven by a subconscious lust for power in addition to his sincere beliefs in founding the Equalists, and it shows: Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. In other words, it was a change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.

to:

* The argument that the Equalists are right forgets one thing: Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict whatever point they have. They want wanted to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders, albeit with technology instead of bending. Even before that, they've done stuff like: Attacking non-benders who aren't with them (e.g. electrocuting Shiro), sabotaging the city and tying up emergency services (what happens if someone has a medical emergency and can't access medical services, or if criminals take advantage of the chaos to commit crimes?), trying to blow up a stadium full of innocents, kidnapping and de-bending innocent benders, and the crowner: ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending, '''to the point where it was rendered near-extinct via genocide less than two centuries ago'''''. In other words, what is '''effectively a was effectively '''a second attempt at genocide'''. Amon is also explicitly stated to have been driven by a subconscious lust for power in addition to his sincere beliefs in founding the Equalists, and it shows: Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. In other words, it was a change in name in and rhetoric, but with while keeping the same underlying power structures.



** Exactly. Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict their arguments. They wanted to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Besides, any point they had would be destroyed by ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending'', i.e. '''effectively attempting genocide a second time'''. Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.

to:

** Exactly. Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict their arguments. They wanted to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Besides, any point they had would be destroyed by ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending'', i.e. '''effectively attempting genocide a second time'''. Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A change in name and in rhetoric, but with while conserving the same underlying power structures.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The argument that the Equalists are right forgets one thing: Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict whatever point they have. They want to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Even before that, they've done stuff like: Attacking non-benders who aren't with them (e.g. electrocuting Shiro), sabotaging the city and tying up emergency services (what happens if someone has a medical emergency and can't access medical services, or if criminals take advantage of the chaos to commit crimes?), trying to blow up a stadium full of innocents, kidnapping and de-bending innocent benders, and the crowner: ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending, to the point where it was rendered near-extinct via genocide less than two centuries ago''. In other words, what is '''effectively a second attempt at genocide'''. Amon is also explicitly stated to have been driven by a subconscious lust for power in addition to his sincere beliefs in founding the Equalists, and it shows: Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.

to:

* The argument that the Equalists are right forgets one thing: Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict whatever point they have. They want to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Even before that, they've done stuff like: Attacking non-benders who aren't with them (e.g. electrocuting Shiro), sabotaging the city and tying up emergency services (what happens if someone has a medical emergency and can't access medical services, or if criminals take advantage of the chaos to commit crimes?), trying to blow up a stadium full of innocents, kidnapping and de-bending innocent benders, and the crowner: ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending, to '''to the point where it was rendered near-extinct via genocide less than two centuries ago''.ago'''''. In other words, what is '''effectively a second attempt at genocide'''. Amon is also explicitly stated to have been driven by a subconscious lust for power in addition to his sincere beliefs in founding the Equalists, and it shows: Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A In other words, it was a change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A proper cultural background won't change the fact that losing your bending is akin to losing a limb. We don't amputate healthy limbs, so why would ''removing bending from a kid who hasn't done anything to warrant removal of their bending'' be acceptable??? That's practically a recipe for intergenerational trauma.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The argument that the Equalists are right forgets one thing: Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict whatever point they have. They want to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Even before that, they've done stuff like: Attacking non-benders who aren't with them (e.g. electrocuting Shiro), sabotaging the city and tying up emergency services (what happens if someone has a medical emergency and can't access medical services, or if criminals take advantage of the chaos to commit crimes?), trying to blow up a stadium full of innocents, kidnapping and de-bending innocent benders, and the crowner: ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending, to the point where it was rendered near-extinct via genocide less than two centuries ago''. In other words, what is '''effectively a second attempt at genocide'''. Amon is also explicitly stated to have been driven by a subconscious lust for power in addition to his sincere beliefs in founding the Equalists, and it shows: Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.


Added DiffLines:

** Exactly. Even though the Equalists ''do'' have legitimate grievances and ''were'' founded in response to very real problems, their actions directly contradict their arguments. They wanted to fight oppression of nonbenders by benders, and yet they do exactly the same to benders AND non-benders once they've taken over Republic City, albeit with technology instead of bending. Besides, any point they had would be destroyed by ''attempting to wipe out Airbending despite its practitioners suffering worse than anyone else at the hands of bending'', i.e. '''effectively attempting genocide a second time'''. Instead of eliminating oppression entirely, the Equalists end up ''redirecting'' that oppression, towards benders and non-benders not with them alike. A change in name in rhetoric, but with the same underlying power structures.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** For some reason a big part of the fanbase seemed to believe that there was no difference between being an Equalist and being a non-bender (you can find entire rants about how there being no sympathetic Equalists is bad writing and not just them being violent terrorists).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: What the heck, townspeople?!]]
* More about the public that supports them than the Equalists themselves, but...are all the people at those rallies supposed to be sociopathic or something? All of them do nothing but stand there and cheer as the Equalists tie innocent people up and rob of something inherent to them - this would be like blind people cutting out the eyes of people who can see and then laughing and cheering about it. These sound like the most evil, twisted people I've ever heard of!

to:

[[folder: What The Equalists have a point?]]
* Where are people getting
the heck, townspeople?!]]
* More about the public
idea that supports them than the Equalists themselves, but...had a point in what they were doing? There are all characters like Amon or Hiroshi who had their loved ones killed by benders, and we see bender gangs like the people at those rallies supposed to be sociopathic or something? All of them do nothing Triple Threats extorting weaker non-benders using their power, but stand there and cheer as the Equalists tie innocent people up and rob of that's not something inherent to them - this would be like blind they should've held against the city. Those people cutting out the eyes of were ''criminals'', and we never had any indication that people who can see were "looking the other way" with regard to them. So why would the Equalist supporters cheer and then laughing applaud, say, a family of innocent airbenders being de-bended, and cheering about it. These sound like the most evil, twisted people I've ever heard of!how is an elected president any better than a council of leaders? The council being made up of benders had nothing to do with anything.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Even so, Amon seems to rally people by saying that society favors benders over non-benders, which can't be tied to the gangs, who are ''criminals.'' If Equalist supporters don't want to be oppressed by gangs, fine, but that's got nothing to do with rebelling against the government.

Top