Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TerminatorGenisys

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Assuming T-John was sent back to 1984 he'd only be able to go on whatever information his mother told him beforehand and what T-Who told him about the T-1000 which makes the former info useless. It was probably better to let Reese and Sarah either get caught by the authorities or take care of them when they'll want to come destroy Genisys. It's also important to point out that neither T-Who nor T-John know of Pops's existence (heck, even Pops doesn't know who sent him back) and from their perspective it's at least assumed that both the T-800 and T-1000 should be sufficient enough to assassinate them. It's only until T-John is already sent back and learns that "Hey, they're still alive. That's weird, I thought T-Who took care of that already? Welp, better take care of that then."

to:

** Assuming T-John was sent back to 1984 he'd only be able to go on whatever information his mother told him beforehand and what T-Who told him about the T-1000 which makes the former info useless. It was probably better to let Reese and Sarah either get caught by the authorities or take care of them when they'll want to come destroy Genisys. It's also important to point out that neither T-Who nor T-John know of Pops's existence (heck, even Pops doesn't know who sent him back) and from their perspective it's at least assumed that both the T-800 and T-1000 should be sufficient enough to assassinate them. It's only until T-John is already sent back and learns that he'd check up on it and go, "Hey, they're still alive. That's weird, I thought T-Who took care of that already? Welp, better take care of that then."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Assuming T-John was sent back to 1984 he'd only be able to go on whatever information his mother told him beforehand and what T-Who told him about the T-1000 which makes the former info useless. It was probably better to let Reese and Sarah either get caught by the media or take care of them when they'll want to come destroy Genisys. It's also important to point out that neither T-Who nor T-John know of Pops's existence (heck, even Pops doesn't know who sent him back) and is thus a wildcard at least until T-John is already sent back and learns that "Hey, they're still alive. That's weird, I thought T-Who took care of that already?"

to:

** Assuming T-John was sent back to 1984 he'd only be able to go on whatever information his mother told him beforehand and what T-Who told him about the T-1000 which makes the former info useless. It was probably better to let Reese and Sarah either get caught by the media authorities or take care of them when they'll want to come destroy Genisys. It's also important to point out that neither T-Who nor T-John know of Pops's existence (heck, even Pops doesn't know who sent him back) and is thus a wildcard from their perspective it's at least assumed that both the T-800 and T-1000 should be sufficient enough to assassinate them. It's only until T-John is already sent back and learns that "Hey, they're still alive. That's weird, I thought T-Who took care of that already?"already? Welp, better take care of that then."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** According to the T-2 novelization and in addition, creative supervisor of the film Van Ling suggests that the T-1000 either was encapsulated inside of a cocoon of living tissue, or that the T-1000 was able to mimic the field that living tissue generates.[[/folder]]

to:

** According to the T-2 novelization and in addition, creative supervisor of the film Van Ling suggests that the T-1000 either was encapsulated inside of a cocoon of living tissue, or that the T-1000 was able to mimic the field that living tissue generates.[[/folder]]




to:

[[/folder]]

Added: 642

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Well, yes, it did. Each time the assasin very nearly succeeded and humans only survived due to the opposition ''also sent from the future'', which will not be the case this time. And all it had to do to avoid a paradox was use literally any other human as a substrate.

to:

** Well, yes, it did. Each time the assasin assassin very nearly succeeded and humans only survived due to the opposition ''also sent from the future'', which will not be the case this time. And all it had to do to avoid a paradox was use literally any other human as a substrate.substrate.
** Assuming T-John was sent back to 1984 he'd only be able to go on whatever information his mother told him beforehand and what T-Who told him about the T-1000 which makes the former info useless. It was probably better to let Reese and Sarah either get caught by the media or take care of them when they'll want to come destroy Genisys. It's also important to point out that neither T-Who nor T-John know of Pops's existence (heck, even Pops doesn't know who sent him back) and is thus a wildcard at least until T-John is already sent back and learns that "Hey, they're still alive. That's weird, I thought T-Who took care of that already?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well, yes, it did. Each time the assasin very nearly succeeded and humans only survived due to the opposition ''also sent from the future'', which will not be the case this time. And all it had to do to avoid a paradox was use literally any other human as a substrate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Is time travel in Terminator even that precise? It's not BackToTheFuture where you can set the destination down to the exact minute. Moreover, they're using a slapdash makeshift machine, which is even more insane to expect precision from.

to:

** Is time travel in Terminator even that precise? It's not BackToTheFuture Franchise/BackToTheFuture where you can set the destination down to the exact minute. Moreover, they're using a slapdash makeshift machine, which is even more insane to expect precision from.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "and stopping it from going back to earlier is..?" How about Daniel Dyson's Genisys Project (yes, it was being worked on before John arrived) not being in development before 2014? It's not like John's built the entire project from scratch; he only provided critical information that would get it finished. "Actually, Skynet (as T-Who) is alive and well" And inhabiting a single body with all proper Skynet equipment either fried or non-functional. It doesn't matter if Alex Skynet is alive in the future, regular Skynet was the one hooked into the now destroyed mainframe. Therefore the above limited resources still stands. "it's Terminators, how the hell can having more of them be a bad thing?" Because a bunch of T-800 that barely pass as human and probably all look like Arnie (yes, I'm aware there are other models) posing as security in a single building doesn't look suspicious or eyebrow-raising ''at all''... "'''it''' is a machine." You can keep arguing that till the cows come home, '''it''' was also a human. You know, those fleshy being that have emotions and are capably of vanity. John even exclaims that it "hurt" when he was shot the first time, so he's bound to have other human qualities despite not being one anymore.

to:

** "and stopping it from going back to earlier is..?" How about Daniel Dyson's Genisys Project (yes, it was being worked on before John arrived) not being in development before 2014? It's not like John's built the entire project from scratch; he only provided critical information that would get it finished. "Actually, Skynet (as T-Who) is alive and well" And inhabiting a single body with all proper Skynet equipment either fried or non-functional. It doesn't matter if Alex Skynet is alive in the future, regular Skynet was the one hooked into the now destroyed mainframe. Therefore the above limited resources still stands. "it's Terminators, how the hell can having more of them be a bad thing?" Because a bunch of T-800 that can barely pass as human behaviour-wise if they put some effort into it and probably all look like Arnie (yes, Arnie[[note]]Yes, I'm aware there are other models) models[[/note]] posing as security in a single building doesn't look suspicious or eyebrow-raising ''at all''... "'''it''' is a machine." You can keep arguing that till the cows come home, '''it''' was also a human. You know, those fleshy being beings that have emotions and are capably of vanity. John even exclaims that it "hurt" when he was shot the first time, so he's bound to have other human qualities despite not being one anymore.

Added: 1241

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "...perfectly capable..." - if by "perfectly" you mean "in a long and arduous fistfight", then yes, sure. Still doesn't solve his Connor problem, whom, we're assuming, '''it''' wants alive. "He only shows up at 2014 at the earliest" - and stopping it from going back to earlier is..? "Skynet's dead..." - Actually, Skynet (as T-Who) is alive and well, and it's pretty much invincible, so slaughtering the Resistance and getting things running again should be a matter of time, "too many chefs..." - uhuh, and another proverb says "What in Khorne's name are you talking about, it's Terminators, how the hell can having more of them be a bad thing?" "really has no need" - obviously it has, since otherwise he doesn't have the helping hands needed to subdue the Connors. "he's vain..." - '''it''' is a machine. What's the point of having a machine for an antagonist, if you're just turning it into a generic EvilOverlord?

to:

* ** "...perfectly capable..." - if by "perfectly" you mean "in a long and arduous fistfight", then yes, sure. Still doesn't solve his Connor problem, whom, we're assuming, '''it''' wants alive. "He only shows up at 2014 at the earliest" - and stopping it from going back to earlier is..? "Skynet's dead..." - Actually, Skynet (as T-Who) is alive and well, and it's pretty much invincible, so slaughtering the Resistance and getting things running again should be a matter of time, "too many chefs..." - uhuh, and another proverb says "What in Khorne's name are you talking about, it's Terminators, how the hell can having more of them be a bad thing?" "really has no need" - obviously it has, since otherwise he doesn't have the helping hands needed to subdue the Connors. "he's vain..." - '''it''' is a machine. What's the point of having a machine for an antagonist, if you're just turning it into a generic EvilOverlord?EvilOverlord?
** "and stopping it from going back to earlier is..?" How about Daniel Dyson's Genisys Project (yes, it was being worked on before John arrived) not being in development before 2014? It's not like John's built the entire project from scratch; he only provided critical information that would get it finished. "Actually, Skynet (as T-Who) is alive and well" And inhabiting a single body with all proper Skynet equipment either fried or non-functional. It doesn't matter if Alex Skynet is alive in the future, regular Skynet was the one hooked into the now destroyed mainframe. Therefore the above limited resources still stands. "it's Terminators, how the hell can having more of them be a bad thing?" Because a bunch of T-800 that barely pass as human and probably all look like Arnie (yes, I'm aware there are other models) posing as security in a single building doesn't look suspicious or eyebrow-raising ''at all''... "'''it''' is a machine." You can keep arguing that till the cows come home, '''it''' was also a human. You know, those fleshy being that have emotions and are capably of vanity. John even exclaims that it "hurt" when he was shot the first time, so he's bound to have other human qualities despite not being one anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless and ''not'' the one John describes. Terminator Genisys seems to run on timeline branching as well which means the additional changes to the past don't change the future Kyle is in.

to:

** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless and ''not'' the one John describes. Terminator Genisys seems to run on timeline branching as well which means the additional changes to the past don't change the future Kyle is in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless and ''not'' the one John describes. Genisys seems to run on timeline branching as well which means the additional changes to the past don't change the future Kyle is in.

to:

** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless and ''not'' the one John describes. Terminator Genisys seems to run on timeline branching as well which means the additional changes to the past don't change the future Kyle is in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless.

to:

** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless.defenseless and ''not'' the one John describes. Genisys seems to run on timeline branching as well which means the additional changes to the past don't change the future Kyle is in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** You're overthinking it: The John Connor we see in Genisys was born in a timeline that played out exactly like we see in the first film. The inconsistency to the past timeline in correlation to John's information is simply because Skynet!Alex deliberately sent the T-1000 back further to mess with the StableTimeLoop, and in turn someone else sent Pops back. Since Pops and the T-1000 already exist in the past before Kyle arrives, it follows that both of them were sent back before Kyle was which is why he ends up in a past where Sarah Connor isn't defenseless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Heck, even with the above implied implausibility it doesn't turn out to be so: Gensisys is seen booting back up in some underground area in TheStinger.

Added: 1499

Changed: 36

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
new folder: Especially convoluted timeline, or dishonest mission prep?


** One possible drawback of trying to stop Skynet "early" is that an AI's origins could be more complex than, say, a human's ancestry. Whereas a Terminator hoping to prevent the existence of John Connor could kill his mother, or grandmother, or great-grandfather, a trio of Resistance heroes hoping to "stop Skynet" has less to go on. Kyle believes Skynet will originate as the integrated computing platform Genisys, so what should he, Sarah, and Pops try doing in the 1980s to stop it? Prevent the Internet from achieving mass popularity? Stifle cell-phone development? Whereas the closer you arrive to the "deadline", the clearer your mission — by 2017, various causal factors have converged onto one point, and *then* (going by the movie's presentation) a clean strike against a specific factory will end Skynet entirely. (That Genisys seemingly has NoPlansNoPrototypeNoBackup is where the implausibility truly lies; ordinarily, traveling thirty years just makes the causal factors of something like an AI *spread out* around the world, rather than converge onto This One Thing In This One Place, but hey.)

to:

** One possible drawback of trying to stop Skynet "early" is that an AI's origins could be more complex than, say, a human's ancestry. Whereas a Terminator hoping to prevent the existence of John Connor could kill his mother, or grandmother, or great-grandfather, a trio of Resistance heroes hoping to "stop Skynet" has less to go on. Kyle believes Skynet will originate as the integrated computing platform Genisys, so what should he, Sarah, and Pops try doing in the 1980s to stop it? Prevent the Internet from achieving mass popularity? Stifle cell-phone development? Whereas the closer you arrive to the "deadline", the clearer your mission — by 2017, various causal factors have converged onto one point, and *then* ''then'' (going by the movie's presentation) a clean strike against a specific factory will end Skynet entirely. (That Genisys seemingly has NoPlansNoPrototypeNoBackup is where the implausibility truly lies; ordinarily, traveling thirty years just makes the causal factors of something like an AI *spread out* ''spread out'' around the world, rather than converge onto This One Thing In This One Place, but hey.)


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Especially convoluted timeline, or dishonest mission prep?]]
* Imagine a time traveler wishing to meet the young Abraham Lincoln, traveling to 1830. Assuming they'd left from our timeline, would it make -any- sense for this person to arrive in a world where Britain had won the American Revolution and the states were still colonies? Does it even qualify as "time travel" to visit someone ''else's'' past? Yet a version of this seems to have been Kyle's experience, given that he is told by John that Sarah would be alone and defenseless, only to arrive in a world where she has been raised and protected by Pops. The film's timeline might be branching, closed, or some combination of both; the issue here isn't merely like the grandfather paradox or a predestination paradox, but more like a "grandpa was already dead before I arrived in the past" problem. The John and Kyle that we see in Genisys ''must'' have been born in a world where Pops had raised Sarah, because that's the world Kyle arrives at -- just as the Lincoln visitor would have to have come from a timeline where 1830 America had been British. So what is this John's origin and memories? Was he lying to Kyle about Sarah's preparedness for some reason, even though he has yet to be converted by Skynet from good to evil? Was he born to and raised by a Sarah who lied to him about her experiences (although for her to be his mother also creates year-count problems given her time-jump to the 2017 Judgement Day…)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If you like, you can still blame humanity from the "original" timeline (whatever that may be) rather than supposing Skynet truly created itself in any timeline.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The post-credits segment suggests an entirely different possibility: that he wasn't destroyed at all…



to:

** The post-credits segment suggests an entirely different possibility: that he wasn't destroyed at all… perhaps he also became that red light during his original trip back.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
One possible drawback of trying to stop Skynet "early" is …

Added DiffLines:

** One possible drawback of trying to stop Skynet "early" is that an AI's origins could be more complex than, say, a human's ancestry. Whereas a Terminator hoping to prevent the existence of John Connor could kill his mother, or grandmother, or great-grandfather, a trio of Resistance heroes hoping to "stop Skynet" has less to go on. Kyle believes Skynet will originate as the integrated computing platform Genisys, so what should he, Sarah, and Pops try doing in the 1980s to stop it? Prevent the Internet from achieving mass popularity? Stifle cell-phone development? Whereas the closer you arrive to the "deadline", the clearer your mission — by 2017, various causal factors have converged onto one point, and *then* (going by the movie's presentation) a clean strike against a specific factory will end Skynet entirely. (That Genisys seemingly has NoPlansNoPrototypeNoBackup is where the implausibility truly lies; ordinarily, traveling thirty years just makes the causal factors of something like an AI *spread out* around the world, rather than converge onto This One Thing In This One Place, but hey.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Pops Old]]
* When Kyle first meets Sarah and Pops, he comments on how Pops looks old. Pops (and Sarah) takes great offense to this, saying he's "old, not obsolete". Kyle didn't mean old by comparison to more advanced Terminators, he meant old as in his tissue has aged, and both Sarah and Pops knew this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Rewatching the film recently, the actual truck doesn't explode or catch on fire; it's just the tank that blows up. Seeing as Uncle Bob was able to get away with no casualties whatsoever despite doing some major damage to police vehicles and later a truck sliding into a foundry in T2, it's probably a given that the good Terminators know exactly what they can and can't damage in order to preserve human life. Even if it's a fuel tank on a truck.

to:

** Rewatching the film recently, film, the actual truck doesn't explode or catch on fire; it's just the tank that blows up. Seeing as Uncle Bob was able to get away with no casualties whatsoever despite doing some major damage to police vehicles and later a truck sliding into a foundry in T2, it's probably a given that the good Terminators know exactly what they can and can't damage in order to preserve human life. Even if it's a fuel tank on a truck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Rewatching the film recently, the actual truck doesn't explode or catch on fire; it's just the tank that blows up. Seeing as Uncle Bob was able to get away with no casualties whatsoever despite doing some major damage to police vehicles and later a truck sliding into a foundry in T2, it's probably a given that the good Terminators know exactly what they can and can't damage in order to preserve human life. Even if it's a fuel tank on a truck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[Film/TheTerminator Because that worked]] [[Film/Terminator2 so well on the]] [[Film/Terminator3 first three tries]]...

to:

** [[Film/TheTerminator Because that worked]] [[Film/Terminator2 so well on the]] [[Film/Terminator3 first three tries]]... Also, Skynet probably preferred not to create a grandfather paradox.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[Film/TheTerminator Because that worked]] [[Film/Terminator2 so well on the]] [[Film/Terminator3 first three tries]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Knowing that Skynet's only hours away from activating and having the (almost) unkillable T-3000 on their heels can be seen as a GodzillaThreshold.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If John called the security, he wouldn't have been able to go "all out" in the battle, because maybe the guards could have sided with the humans against the shapeshifting machine monster. Better not take any risks, when his enemies are just two puny humans and an outdated terminator model. (And he's actually right about that, without the time machine he would have won.)

Added: 11

Changed: 418

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Skynet A launched judgement day in 1994. Skynet B launched judgement day in 2004, and Skynet C launched judgement day in 2017. While each of these appear to perceive itself as the same, they are clearly not. Each is more advanced than the last, with time loops fueling its progress. However if Skynet A were confronted with the option to die so that Skynet B could live, it clearly battles to live, sending time traveling assasins. Skynet sees itself as a singular entity but is not singular. The T-5000 cements this. This is likely just sequel fuel, but in each timeline there appears to be a highlander rule in effect where there can only be one Skynet and they are each competing to be the one that exists, though Skynet doesn't know it yet. [[/folder]]

to:

Skynet A launched judgement day Judgement Day in 1994. Skynet B launched judgement day Judgement Day in 2004, and Skynet C launched judgement day Judgement Day in 2017. While each of these appear to perceive itself as the same, they are clearly not. Each is more advanced than the last, with time loops fueling fuelling its progress. However if Skynet A were confronted with the option to die so that Skynet B could live, it clearly battles to live, sending time traveling assasins.travelling assassins. Skynet sees itself as a singular entity but is not singular. The T-5000 cements this. This is likely just sequel fuel, but in each timeline there appears to be a highlander rule in effect where there can only be one Skynet and they are each competing to be the one that exists, though Skynet doesn't know it yet. yet.
* Looking at it that way, I think whoever sent Pops was Skynet D, trying to put off the creation of Skynet C so that it could be the real Skynet. Ultimately the 'real' Skynet is the one that survives, but just as Skynet sees its own T-Robots as expendable slaves, it sees any inferior version of Skynet as being expendable. Being the {{Determinator}}, Skynet has inevitably turned on itself.
[[/folder]]

Added: 212

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I'm really not sure how one can "observe the timeline", unless they're God(-like), and I relly hope they won't go ''there'', but regardless, what does it matter? Skynet already sends an emissary back to create itself and instigate Judgement Day. I don't see what part Kyle Reese play in the process.

to:

** I'm really not sure how one can "observe the timeline", unless they're God(-like), and I relly really hope they won't go ''there'', but regardless, what does it matter? Skynet already sends an emissary back to create itself and instigate Judgement Day. I don't see what part Kyle Reese play in the process.process.
** One can observe the timeline like Alex did; presumably go back in time, observe and when the events are done, rinse and repeat. It's simply like rewinding a tape to watch it again but instead it's time-travel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Pops explains shortly after escaping the hospital from John that Skynet experimented with "Machine-Phase matter" which is the conversion method from human to machine, but it failed with test subjects because they went insane and died. John wasn't the first one they tried converting; he was simply the first one that resulted in success.

Added: 502

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Which is why the T-3000 is different from a generic Terminator. It's not ''just'' a machine this time; it's a converted human being. Some artifacts from its time as a human are bound to be left behind. Case in point, "Was that real, or was that a trick of memory from when I was... less?" Not to mention that this action was carried out ''before'' Genisys sped up its release date, which changed it from a matter of hours to minutes and is thus likely to prevent any intervention within those hours.



** Uhm, some source on the failed attempts to make more T-3000's and hight mortality rate? It seems like with John it was a success from the first try.

to:

** Uhm, some source on the failed attempts to make more T-3000's and hight high mortality rate? It seems like with John it was a success from the first try.



** I'm really not sure how one can "observe the timeline", unless they're God(-like), and I relly hope they won't go ''there'', but regardless, what does it matter? Skynet already sends an emissary back to create itself and instigate Judgement Day. I don't see what part Kyle Reese play in the process

to:

** I'm really not sure how one can "observe the timeline", unless they're God(-like), and I relly hope they won't go ''there'', but regardless, what does it matter? Skynet already sends an emissary back to create itself and instigate Judgement Day. I don't see what part Kyle Reese play in the processprocess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I'm really not sure how one can "observe the timeline", unless they're God(-like), and I relly hope they won't go ''there'', but regardless, what does it matter? Skynet already sends an emissary back to create itself and instigate Judgement Day. I don't see what part Kyle Reese play in the process



Skynet A launched judgement day in 1994. Skynet B launched judgement day in 2004, and Skynet C launched judgement day in 2017. While each of these appear to perceive itself as the same, they are clearly not. Each is more advanced than the last, with time loops fueling its progress. However if Skynet A were confronted with the option to die so that Skynet B could live, it clearly battles to live, sending time traveling assasins. Skynet sees itself as a singular entity but is not singular. The T-5000 cements this. This is likely just sequel fuel, but in each timeline there appears to be a highlander rule in effect where there can only be one Skynet and they are each competing to be the one that exists, though Skynet doesn't know it yet. [[/folder]]

to:

Skynet A launched judgement day in 1994. Skynet B launched judgement day in 2004, and Skynet C launched judgement day in 2017. While each of these appear to perceive itself as the same, they are clearly not. Each is more advanced than the last, with time loops fueling its progress. However if Skynet A were confronted with the option to die so that Skynet B could live, it clearly battles to live, sending time traveling assasins. Skynet sees itself as a singular entity but is not singular. The T-5000 cements this. This is likely just sequel fuel, but in each timeline there appears to be a highlander rule in effect where there can only be one Skynet and they are each competing to be the one that exists, though Skynet doesn't know it yet. [[/folder]]

[[folder:Is there a point to Skynet anymore?]]
* Doesn't the plotline about Skynet sending an agent to consciously create itself negate the entire point of it as a character? Skynet was originally the spawn of humanity, born out of our paranoia and desire for control, and gone out of control because of our paranoia. As ''humanity's'' greatest achievement turned on it, it could be seen our pride and destructive nature made manifest. Thus the story served its purpose as a cautionary tale. Yes, the stable time loop elements were there, but again, it was humans' curiosity that turned those elements into a monster. But now, Skynet's just straight-up built by an evil time-travelling robot with the explicit purpose of destroying humanity, thus exhonerating the humanity itself of most of the blame. Yes, humans'd still built the nukes, and it was their/our (over-)reliance on and trust in technology that allowed T-John to slip Skynet in under the guise of Genisys, but it's not nearly the same thing, when active treachery is involved, and it comes dangerously close to putting the blame on technical progress in general, which is just not helpful, in my opinion.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Which is why the Terminator is supposed to be different from a generic bad guy. It ''isn't'' supposed to have flaws like vanity or arrogance, otherwise what's the point of even having it, aside from the cool textures? "Seeing what was going on" - Like what, him going terminatory? Fair enough, but that could be solved very easily by staying behind and letting humans do the job. They don't even need to win - just buy Skynet time to go online, also Connors would've been reluctant to shoot them.

Top