Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Hannibal

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I see what you're saying about Hannibal's animalism and the mask starting to slip. However I call "Objection!" on Jack's actions. There's a whole world of difference between murder and justified self defence. We can only logically infer that when Jack starts to draw his gun on Hannibal, it's not to summarily execute him (or even to attempt a wounding/disabling shot), but rather to hold it on him and aid the arrest. Hannibal is intelligent enough to know that Jack, as an upstanding man of the law, will not shoot him. And how does he respond? By throwing a knife into his hand, leaping the kitchen counter and rushing at him with further deadly attacks. And yeah, Jack responds first to that by pulling the blade out and knife fighting, but at that point all gloves are off. The man who threw the knife turned it into a life-or-death confrontation, and that was not the action of an innocent man. He only threw it because he knew the jig was up, and letting Jack hold the gun on him would lead to incarceration, so instead he decides to kill Jack. At that point, Jack is fighting for his life, which would be a more pressing concern than regular police procedure to arrest the suspect. And again, that ''does not'' make him a murderer. Even putting aside everything he can guess about Hannibal's cunning and danger from all the previous crimes, he can see how vicously and relentlessly this guy is trying to murder him. That alone would be an easy thing to justify to anyone questioning him about the encounter. He could argue that by garroting him to death, he stopped Hannibal from stabbing him in the neck... which does indeed happen. Or then that he stopped Hannibal from putting several other people's lies in mortal danger, which again, happens. Even a suspended Fed like he should be legally and morally vindicated for that course of action, in a way that would make sense within the realms of fiction or otherwise.

to:

** I see what you're saying about Hannibal's animalism and the mask starting to slip. However I call "Objection!" on Jack's actions. So let me play his lawyer. There's a whole world of difference between murder and justified self defence. We can only logically infer that when Jack starts to draw his gun on Hannibal, it's not to summarily execute him (or even to attempt a wounding/disabling shot), but rather to hold it on him and aid the arrest. Hannibal is intelligent enough to know that Jack, as an upstanding man of the law, will not shoot him. And how does he respond? By throwing a knife into his hand, leaping the kitchen counter and rushing at him with further deadly attacks. And yeah, Jack responds first to that by pulling the blade out and knife fighting, but at that point all gloves are off. The man who threw the knife turned it into a life-or-death confrontation, and that was not the action of an innocent man. He only threw it because he knew the jig was up, and letting Jack hold draw the gun on him would lead to incarceration, so instead he decides to kill Jack. At that point, Jack is fighting for his life, which would be a more pressing concern than regular police procedure to arrest the suspect. And again, that ''does not'' make him a murderer. Even putting aside everything he can guess about Hannibal's cunning and danger from all the previous crimes, he can see how vicously and relentlessly this guy is trying to murder him. That alone would be an easy thing to justify to anyone questioning him about the encounter. He could argue that by garroting him to death, he stopped Hannibal from stabbing him in the neck... which does indeed happen. Or then that he stopped Hannibal from putting several other people's lies in mortal danger, which again, happens. Even a suspended Fed like he should be legally and morally vindicated for that course of action, in a way that would make sense within the realms of fiction or otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I see what you're saying about Hannibal's animalism and the mask starting to slip. However I call "Objection!" on Jack's actions. There's a whole world of difference between murder and justified self defence. We can only logically infer that when Jack starts to draw his gun on Hannibal, it's not to summarily execute him (or even to attempt a wounding/disabling shot), but rather to hold it on him and aid the arrest. Hannibal is intelligent enough to know that Jack, as an upstanding man of the law, will not shoot him. And how does he respond? By throwing a knife into his hand, leaping the kitchen counter and rushing at him with further deadly attacks.

to:

** I see what you're saying about Hannibal's animalism and the mask starting to slip. However I call "Objection!" on Jack's actions. There's a whole world of difference between murder and justified self defence. We can only logically infer that when Jack starts to draw his gun on Hannibal, it's not to summarily execute him (or even to attempt a wounding/disabling shot), but rather to hold it on him and aid the arrest. Hannibal is intelligent enough to know that Jack, as an upstanding man of the law, will not shoot him. And how does he respond? By throwing a knife into his hand, leaping the kitchen counter and rushing at him with further deadly attacks. And yeah, Jack responds first to that by pulling the blade out and knife fighting, but at that point all gloves are off. The man who threw the knife turned it into a life-or-death confrontation, and that was not the action of an innocent man. He only threw it because he knew the jig was up, and letting Jack hold the gun on him would lead to incarceration, so instead he decides to kill Jack. At that point, Jack is fighting for his life, which would be a more pressing concern than regular police procedure to arrest the suspect. And again, that ''does not'' make him a murderer. Even putting aside everything he can guess about Hannibal's cunning and danger from all the previous crimes, he can see how vicously and relentlessly this guy is trying to murder him. That alone would be an easy thing to justify to anyone questioning him about the encounter. He could argue that by garroting him to death, he stopped Hannibal from stabbing him in the neck... which does indeed happen. Or then that he stopped Hannibal from putting several other people's lies in mortal danger, which again, happens. Even a suspended Fed like he should be legally and morally vindicated for that course of action, in a way that would make sense within the realms of fiction or otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* To start with Jack; The show is about murderers, and Jack isn't one. We never actually see Jack or the Feds fatally shoot anyone, only Will and confirmed killers. Even Bev only wounds Molly Shannon. When Jack arrives at Lecter he's only suspended, and he knows there's no hard evidence to convict Lecter. He knows Lecter is preparing to leave, and has already framed Chilton, has destroyed his old notes and presumably any other evidence connecting him to the crimes. If Jack had just strangled him to death, Jack would definitely go to prison, Bella would die along and he'd never even prove who Lecter was. By subduing him, he was being a very good Fed, doing the right thing legally and morally and ensuring he'd remain at Bella's side as she died. The only time we see anyone on the team fatally shoot a bad guy is Will's entirely justified shooting of Hobbs, and it's his personal moral event horizon. Jack can't just strangle a man he only thinks and can not prove is the Ripper.
As to Hannibal and the door...you could argue that by that point he might have gone a bit beyond logic? Like it's the only really scary slip of his mask where we see the animal, who is so intent on murder it isn't thinking with Hannibal's usual ruthless ration and logic.

to:

* ** To start with Jack; The show is about murderers, and Jack isn't one. We never actually see Jack or the Feds fatally shoot anyone, only Will and confirmed killers. Even Bev only wounds Molly Shannon. When Jack arrives at Lecter he's only suspended, and he knows there's no hard evidence to convict Lecter. He knows Lecter is preparing to leave, and has already framed Chilton, has destroyed his old notes and presumably any other evidence connecting him to the crimes. If Jack had just strangled him to death, Jack would definitely go to prison, Bella would die along and he'd never even prove who Lecter was. By subduing him, he was being a very good Fed, doing the right thing legally and morally and ensuring he'd remain at Bella's side as she died. The only time we see anyone on the team fatally shoot a bad guy is Will's entirely justified shooting of Hobbs, and it's his personal moral event horizon. Jack can't just strangle a man he only thinks and can not prove is the Ripper. \n As to Hannibal and the door...you could argue that by that point he might have gone a bit beyond logic? Like it's the only really scary slip of his mask where we see the animal, who is so intent on murder it isn't thinking with Hannibal's usual ruthless ration and logic.logic.
** I see what you're saying about Hannibal's animalism and the mask starting to slip. However I call "Objection!" on Jack's actions. There's a whole world of difference between murder and justified self defence. We can only logically infer that when Jack starts to draw his gun on Hannibal, it's not to summarily execute him (or even to attempt a wounding/disabling shot), but rather to hold it on him and aid the arrest. Hannibal is intelligent enough to know that Jack, as an upstanding man of the law, will not shoot him. And how does he respond? By throwing a knife into his hand, leaping the kitchen counter and rushing at him with further deadly attacks.



** Is it possible he could charter the plane, perhaps with an amoral friend in the aviation industry, rapidly enough to beat the alert? And have it land in an airstrip not under the auspices of the international airport community? Yeah that's a big stretch, but Hannibal as a character in general is known to stretch plausibility in several ways. Then, him hiding in Italy is open to debate, but not so hard to justify either. Not everyone follows America-based serial killers, and dopplegangers do exist.

to:

** Is it possible he could charter the plane, plane privately, perhaps with an amoral friend in the aviation industry, and rapidly enough to beat the alert? And have it land in an airstrip not under the auspices of the international airport community? Yeah that's a big stretch, but Hannibal as a character in general is known to stretch plausibility in several ways. Then, him hiding in Italy is open to debate, but not so hard to justify either. Not everyone follows America-based serial killers, and dopplegangers do exist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Since the show is updated to the modern day, it is a bit of a stretch that Lecter was able to fly out of the country by a commercial plane, enter Europe and remain hidden for months, completely above suspicion, while making ZERO effort whatsoever to conceal he or Bedelia's identity, especially given not just the scale of his crimes, but the incredibly violent scene he left behind, with a dead body and three mortally wounded people in his house. Will had called EMT before he went indoors, so help was moments behind. The alarm about Lecter would have been raised incredibly quickly. His passports frozen, is identity plastered across the news, his image sent to airports, docks, the borders, anywhere he could leave the country. International airports, especially European ones would be alerted he may be travelling to them, Interpol would be made aware. Once Hannibal was named as a suspect and the chance he returned to Europe raised, background checks would have been done that revealed he was suspected for the Il Monstro cases and contact would have been made between the US and European authorities. Even if Hannibal could escape the US and into Europe, perhaps by roundabout means (but not so roundabout he avoided business class), Florence isn't detached from the modern world. People would have heard about the Hannibal Lecter case. He still moves in the same circles of academic and socialites, surely some of them heard the story of a European Socialite in the US who murdered dozens? The first half of season 3 really only make sense if you believe Florence to be completely shielded from any form of modern technology, from computers, cell phones, even just televisions.

to:

* Since the show is updated to the modern day, it is a bit of a stretch that Lecter was able to fly out of the country by a commercial plane, enter Europe and remain hidden for months, completely above suspicion, while making ZERO effort whatsoever to conceal he or Bedelia's identity, especially given not just the scale of his crimes, but the incredibly violent scene he left behind, with a dead body and three mortally wounded people in his house. Will had called EMT before he went indoors, so help was moments behind. The alarm about Lecter would have been raised incredibly quickly. His passports frozen, is identity plastered across the news, his image sent to airports, docks, the borders, anywhere he could leave the country. International airports, especially European ones would be alerted he may be travelling to them, Interpol would be made aware. Once Hannibal was named as a suspect and the chance he returned to Europe raised, background checks would have been done that revealed he was suspected for the Il Monstro cases and contact would have been made between the US and European authorities. Even if Hannibal could escape the US and into Europe, perhaps by roundabout means (but not so roundabout he avoided business class), Florence isn't detached from the modern world. People would have heard about the Hannibal Lecter case. He still moves in the same circles of academic and socialites, surely some of them heard the story of a European Socialite in the US who murdered dozens? The first half of season 3 really only make sense if you believe Florence to be completely shielded from any form of modern technology, from computers, cell phones, even just televisions.televisions.
** Is it possible he could charter the plane, perhaps with an amoral friend in the aviation industry, rapidly enough to beat the alert? And have it land in an airstrip not under the auspices of the international airport community? Yeah that's a big stretch, but Hannibal as a character in general is known to stretch plausibility in several ways. Then, him hiding in Italy is open to debate, but not so hard to justify either. Not everyone follows America-based serial killers, and dopplegangers do exist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**That still begs the question; was the FBI okay just okay with Will not only desecrating a corpse of a man he killed (under circumstances that could still be challenged) but then the...basically destroying of evidence of his own 'crime'? Did will knowingly eat Randall? And the FBI made peace with this later on? And...presumably...the world, and media?


Added DiffLines:

** Will lives a very humble life, his cabin is small, he has no TV, no internet at his place, his water and power are probably self sufficient, keeping costs low, and he has absolutely no social life. He doesn't even seem to listen to that much music. He was a professor and probably an incredibly well paid one for years before Jack and Lecter and everything that happened so it's entirely possible he is just quietly very wealthy, has fantastic insurance (or gets it through the FBI) and/or has made good investments that mean he doesn't rely on his work to survive (which fits his persona anyway). After the events of season 1 and 2, it's safe to assume that some settlements may have been reached in Will's favour. Everything that happened to him was the fault of somebody or some institution who failed him or was actively complicit in the abuse he suffered. The FBI exposed him to trauma and introduced him to Lecter, Sutcliffe conspired with Hannibal to hide his illness, the FBI nerds could be argued as not doing sufficient forensic testing to confirm if he'd eaten human flesh when he was arrested, Chilton knew Lecter used unorthodox therapy methods but never raised the concern to Alana or anyone until Will was already arrested (and damaged by its effects) Chilton or the hospital or the State of Baltimore allowed Matthew to get work there and then Cynthia Nixon falsely accused Will once, was proven wrong, mis read his intentions a second time and as a direct result of her decision, caused Alana, Jack and Will's near fatal injuries, and Abigail's death. If Will didn't get SOME money from somewhere, his lawyer isn't doing his job.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's not entirely clear [[spoiler: that the FBI DOES think Chilton is the Ripper. Certainly the arrest and process him and put on a display Lecter will see, but we never get to learn if they actually intended to go through with charging him, or if he would have been rushed off to Witness Protection like Freddie. Jack knows that Will was similarly absolutely soaked in 'hard' evidence that made him look guilty beyond any shadow of a doubt, it doesn't make sense he'd be entirely accepting of Chilton as suspect, even with Miriam's dramatic identification]]



*The wife explains during her interview that her husband nearly died in a fire as a child. When rescued he was told he must have a Guardian Angel. The link between this and his crimes as an adult are fairly easy to make. That's not to say Dolarhyde, or somebody, didn't help him to die, but his inspirations for his crimes are built in.



* In "Dolce," Will and Hannibal have their long-awaited reunion and then stroll outside into a public street. Will attempts to pull a knife on Hannibal and is stopped (via sniper rifle) by Chiyoh. But what exactly was his plan? They were in public. Was he going to gut Hannibal right there in front of everyone?

to:

* In "Dolce," Will and Hannibal have their long-awaited reunion and then stroll outside into a public street. Will attempts to pull a knife on Hannibal and is stopped (via sniper rifle) by Chiyoh. But what exactly was his plan? They were in public. Was he going to gut Hannibal right there in front of everyone?everyone?
* Since the show is updated to the modern day, it is a bit of a stretch that Lecter was able to fly out of the country by a commercial plane, enter Europe and remain hidden for months, completely above suspicion, while making ZERO effort whatsoever to conceal he or Bedelia's identity, especially given not just the scale of his crimes, but the incredibly violent scene he left behind, with a dead body and three mortally wounded people in his house. Will had called EMT before he went indoors, so help was moments behind. The alarm about Lecter would have been raised incredibly quickly. His passports frozen, is identity plastered across the news, his image sent to airports, docks, the borders, anywhere he could leave the country. International airports, especially European ones would be alerted he may be travelling to them, Interpol would be made aware. Once Hannibal was named as a suspect and the chance he returned to Europe raised, background checks would have been done that revealed he was suspected for the Il Monstro cases and contact would have been made between the US and European authorities. Even if Hannibal could escape the US and into Europe, perhaps by roundabout means (but not so roundabout he avoided business class), Florence isn't detached from the modern world. People would have heard about the Hannibal Lecter case. He still moves in the same circles of academic and socialites, surely some of them heard the story of a European Socialite in the US who murdered dozens? The first half of season 3 really only make sense if you believe Florence to be completely shielded from any form of modern technology, from computers, cell phones, even just televisions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*To start with Jack; The show is about murderers, and Jack isn't one. We never actually see Jack or the Feds fatally shoot anyone, only Will and confirmed killers. Even Bev only wounds Molly Shannon. When Jack arrives at Lecter he's only suspended, and he knows there's no hard evidence to convict Lecter. He knows Lecter is preparing to leave, and has already framed Chilton, has destroyed his old notes and presumably any other evidence connecting him to the crimes. If Jack had just strangled him to death, Jack would definitely go to prison, Bella would die along and he'd never even prove who Lecter was. By subduing him, he was being a very good Fed, doing the right thing legally and morally and ensuring he'd remain at Bella's side as she died. The only time we see anyone on the team fatally shoot a bad guy is Will's entirely justified shooting of Hobbs, and it's his personal moral event horizon. Jack can't just strangle a man he only thinks and can not prove is the Ripper.
As to Hannibal and the door...you could argue that by that point he might have gone a bit beyond logic? Like it's the only really scary slip of his mask where we see the animal, who is so intent on murder it isn't thinking with Hannibal's usual ruthless ration and logic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** You can't tell during an autopsy if an injury was inflicted using cunning. You might be able to surmise someone may have been struck by surprise, based on a lack of defensive wounds or other injuries, but given that Tobias was both badly beaten, and had badly beaten Lecter, there would be no way to guess which of his injuries could have bee inflicted in a direct assault or a sneak attack of any kind. Lecter could say Tobias arrived with the injury, or he could claim he was trying to use the ladder between he and Tobias, and Tobias just reached through the space and grabbed him. So Lecter just grabbed his arm ad pushed. 'It was instinct, I wasn't thinking about it, I didn't even hear it break!'. Lecter IS a large, strong, physically fit man, which he doesn't hide or keep concealed, if anything dresses to emphasis, so it's a mystery how this mild mannered doctor might be strong enough to break another mans arm.


Added DiffLines:

** I genuinely believe Hannibal was just being possessive of a future victim he really really wanted to murder. As you say when the scene opens Hannibal is firing Franklin as a patient (and is likely expecting Will to have killed or caught Tobias). In that moment he is almost certainly setting Franklin up as a future victim and meal, firing him now to create distance so that in years if he kills and eats him, the connection wont be as clear. When Tobias arrives and the plan changes, Hannibal could still, for a second, be hoping to retain a kill he thinks he's earned, and maybe thinking he'll kill Tobias, make it look like HE killed Franklin as his last victim, while getting them both out of his hair.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In Dolce, keep in mind that Hannibal was also freshly pissed from Will's latest "betrayal" (attempting to stab him) and he's been shown to be impulsive. By "Digestivo," he's had time to cool off during their shared kidnapping experience. Not to mention, Hannibal seemed visibly impressed/pleased when Will bit a piece off Cordell's face, so he must have felt newly endeared to his frenemy.



* Is it true that humans run the risk of turning insane through engaging in cannibalism (or is that just specifically for eating human brains?). If so, does ''being aware'' that you're doing it have an effect on the sanity-loss? Would the risk to sanity only come when/if the various characters found out that Hannibal/Garrett/whoever else tricked them into eating human meat disguised as animal?

to:

* Is it true that humans run the risk of turning insane through engaging in cannibalism (or is that just specifically for eating human brains?). If so, does ''being aware'' that you're doing it have an effect on the sanity-loss? Would the risk to sanity only come when/if the various characters found out that Hannibal/Garrett/whoever else tricked them into eating human meat disguised as animal?animal?
* In "Dolce," Will and Hannibal have their long-awaited reunion and then stroll outside into a public street. Will attempts to pull a knife on Hannibal and is stopped (via sniper rifle) by Chiyoh. But what exactly was his plan? They were in public. Was he going to gut Hannibal right there in front of everyone?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While the confrontation between Hannibal and Tobias is undeniably an AwesomeMoment, [[FridgeLogic when you think about the subsequent investigation]] it would seem to be as [[PlotHole holey]] as the episode's namesake. This kicks in from the moment Lecter breaks Tobias' right arm on the ladder. His full statement to the police/FBI would be something like: "I was providing my weekly therapy session to Franklin. During the break I excused myself to get a glass of water. On my return I was horrified to find Tobias standing over Franklin's corpse, proudly proclaiming that he snapped his neck. He then attacked me with a set of steel strings as a whip, then a glass stool and subsequently stabbed me in the thigh with my pen opener. I did everything in my power to defend myself but he started to overpower me with punches, kicks and knee strikes. Fearing for my life I was forced to break his arm, at which point he yelled in agony, stumbling back against the table and knocking the statue onto his head. He died instantly, and I proceeded to contact the authorities.". Fair enough. But it doesn't really stand up.

to:

* While the confrontation between Hannibal and Tobias is undeniably an AwesomeMoment, a SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome, [[FridgeLogic when you think about the subsequent investigation]] it would seem to be as [[PlotHole holey]] as the episode's namesake. This kicks in from the moment Lecter breaks Tobias' right arm on the ladder. His full statement to the police/FBI would be something like: "I was providing my weekly therapy session to Franklin. During the break I excused myself to get a glass of water. On my return I was horrified to find Tobias standing over Franklin's corpse, proudly proclaiming that he snapped his neck. He then attacked me with a set of steel strings as a whip, then a glass stool and subsequently stabbed me in the thigh with my pen opener. I did everything in my power to defend myself but he started to overpower me with punches, kicks and knee strikes. Fearing for my life I was forced to break his arm, at which point he yelled in agony, stumbling back against the table and knocking the statue onto his head. He died instantly, and I proceeded to contact the authorities.". Fair enough. But it doesn't really stand up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Answered movie question, asked TV question.


** He was in an awful hurry with the authorities closing in. Yes he could have picked the lock, but doing that runs the risk of having further physical altercations with Clarice. He doesn't want to hurt her, physically, more than he already has. Faking-out a chop to her wrist with the meat cleaver leaves her shocked for a minute, enough time for him to run away and (however implausibly you might find it with how the film portrays it) melt into the darkness with the cops none the wiser.



** Well, if memory serves, by the time Will admits this to Jack, Jack has come round to the idea that Lecter is the Ripper he's been hunting all along and the guy who killed / abducted and mutilated his agent Miriam Lass, and otherwise has been screwing with him, his friends and his family. In other words, Jack ''truly'' doesn't care, or at least he's willing to overlook it given what Will personally was going through at the time and the particular situation he was in. As to the rest...yes, what Will did was conspiracy murder and could get him a prison sentence, but to be fair, the series runs on HollywoodLaw throughout so it isn't that much of an issue.

to:

** Well, if memory serves, by the time Will admits this to Jack, Jack has come round to the idea that Lecter is the Ripper he's been hunting all along and the guy who killed / abducted and mutilated his agent Miriam Lass, and otherwise has been screwing with him, his friends and his family. In other words, Jack ''truly'' doesn't care, or at least he's willing to overlook it given what Will personally was going through at the time and the particular situation he was in. As to the rest...yes, what Will did was conspiracy murder and could get him a prison sentence, but to be fair, the series runs on HollywoodLaw throughout so it isn't that much of an issue.issue.
* Is it true that humans run the risk of turning insane through engaging in cannibalism (or is that just specifically for eating human brains?). If so, does ''being aware'' that you're doing it have an effect on the sanity-loss? Would the risk to sanity only come when/if the various characters found out that Hannibal/Garrett/whoever else tricked them into eating human meat disguised as animal?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Again in "Fromage", when Tobias confronts Franklyn and Hannibal at the office, Hannibal appears to offer Franklyn an exit so that he can deal with Tobias himself (Non-violently? Who knows) but Tobias converesly orders Franklyn to remain where he is. Was Hannibal being genuine here? Did he really want to try to get his patient out safely? Because moments before, he was trying to withdraw him from his therapy, so this could be an extension of that. Or was it a feint to prepare him to be killed?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why doesn't Will suffer any legal repercussions for sending Matthew Brown to kill Hannibal? The only person who seems to have any kind of problem with it is Alana. Shouldn't he have at least be charged with attempted murder even if Hannibal himself didn't want to press any charges? Will admits that he did it right in front of Jack a few episodes later and Jack doesn't seem to care!

to:

* Why doesn't Will suffer any legal repercussions for sending Matthew Brown to kill Hannibal? The only person who seems to have any kind of problem with it is Alana. Shouldn't he have at least be charged with attempted murder even if Hannibal himself didn't want to press any charges? Will admits that he did it right in front of Jack a few episodes later and Jack doesn't seem to care!care!
** Well, if memory serves, by the time Will admits this to Jack, Jack has come round to the idea that Lecter is the Ripper he's been hunting all along and the guy who killed / abducted and mutilated his agent Miriam Lass, and otherwise has been screwing with him, his friends and his family. In other words, Jack ''truly'' doesn't care, or at least he's willing to overlook it given what Will personally was going through at the time and the particular situation he was in. As to the rest...yes, what Will did was conspiracy murder and could get him a prison sentence, but to be fair, the series runs on HollywoodLaw throughout so it isn't that much of an issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It was Wills assumption that the Ripper was eating people. For years prior to that, the Feds (somewhat improbably) never thought of this, and just assumed he was collecting trophies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* How does Chilton suddenly regain the ability to walk without the cane? He still ran with a noticeable limp when running from arrest in season 2, but season 3 he's suddenly recovered?

to:

* How does Chilton suddenly regain the ability to walk without the cane? He still ran with a noticeable limp when running from arrest in season 2, but season 3 he's suddenly recovered?recovered?
*Why doesn't Will suffer any legal repercussions for sending Matthew Brown to kill Hannibal? The only person who seems to have any kind of problem with it is Alana. Shouldn't he have at least be charged with attempted murder even if Hannibal himself didn't want to press any charges? Will admits that he did it right in front of Jack a few episodes later and Jack doesn't seem to care!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* How can the FBI misidentify [[spoiler: Dr Frederick Chilton]] as the Chesapeake Ripper when it's abundantly established that [[spoiler: he cannot digest meat due to a ''missing kidney'']]?

to:

* How can the FBI misidentify [[spoiler: Dr Frederick Chilton]] as the Chesapeake Ripper when it's abundantly established that [[spoiler: he cannot digest handle eating meat due to a ''missing kidney'']]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* How can the FBI misidentify [[spoiler: Dr Frederick Chilton]] as the Chesapeake Ripper when it's abundantly established that [[spoiler: he cannot digest meat due to a ''missing kidney'']]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A question about the film of ''Literature/{{Hannibal}}''. Maybe it was just RuleOfDrama, but Hannibal had already proven himself quite handy at picking a handcuff lock. Why in the hell did he need to [[spoiler: cut off his hand?]]

to:

* A question about the film of ''Literature/{{Hannibal}}''. Maybe it was just RuleOfDrama, but Hannibal had already proven himself quite handy at picking a handcuff lock. Why in the hell did he need to [[spoiler: cut off his hand?]]hand?]]
* How does Chilton suddenly regain the ability to walk without the cane? He still ran with a noticeable limp when running from arrest in season 2, but season 3 he's suddenly recovered?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed per TRS.


* Also in "Fromage", how does Tobias overcome two armed police officers in the space of about 30 seconds (while Will is outside) and murder them both? Yes he's a BadAss and a SmugSnake, but regardless. Of course Hannibal managed it in TSOTL but we actually '''saw''' how he pulled that off. To be fair, given Will's mental state it's possible he spent longer outside than the scene suggests investigating the audio hallucination, but still. The nature of their deaths is fairly elaborate.

to:

* Also in "Fromage", how does Tobias overcome two armed police officers in the space of about 30 seconds (while Will is outside) and murder them both? Yes he's a BadAss badass and a SmugSnake, but regardless. Of course Hannibal managed it in TSOTL but we actually '''saw''' how he pulled that off. To be fair, given Will's mental state it's possible he spent longer outside than the scene suggests investigating the audio hallucination, but still. The nature of their deaths is fairly elaborate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's possible and even probable that the meat comes from Randall Tier, who died violently at the hands of Will Graham, and whose corpse was then made into a museum installation by that same Will Graham. When Freddie Lounds breaks into Will Graham's barn, she finds pieces of human flesh (a fragment of jaw, I believe?), so he presumably kept all the ... meat... he scrapped off Randall Tier's skeleton for later cannibal-hooking purposes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If you nearly die in the line of duty (multiple times), and you know EVERYTHING they screwed up while investigating murderers, I'm pretty sure the FBI has a retirement package for you, and it would be a fairly hefty one, even after they cover your screwups. Graham lives a simple life and canon (Literature/RedDragon) tells us that he ''fixes'' boats for a living after he retires. That's not addressed in the series, but at the end of the film version of Red Dragon, he's on a boat. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he took an old rustbucket boat and fixed it up.

to:

** If you nearly die in the line of duty (multiple times), and you know EVERYTHING they screwed up while investigating murderers, I'm pretty sure the FBI has a retirement package for you, and it would be a fairly hefty one, even after they cover your screwups. Graham lives a simple life and canon (Literature/RedDragon) tells us that he ''fixes'' boats for a living after he retires. That's not addressed in the series, but at the end of the film version of Red Dragon, he's on a boat. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he took an old rustbucket boat and fixed it up.up.
* A question about the film of ''Literature/{{Hannibal}}''. Maybe it was just RuleOfDrama, but Hannibal had already proven himself quite handy at picking a handcuff lock. Why in the hell did he need to [[spoiler: cut off his hand?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* How does Will pay for anything? He kept blacking out or having Jack interrupt his classes to have him consult on cases when he was teaching, and then he was in a mental institution. When he got out he wasn't consulting on cases in an official capacity, so he wasn't getting paid. Come season 3 he has the money to get on a boat (that he seems to own) and go to Italy after an extended hospital stay and months of implied unemployed recuperation. Even if he was living off his savings, you'd think it would have come up at some point.

to:

* How does Will pay for anything? He kept blacking out or having Jack interrupt his classes to have him consult on cases when he was teaching, and then he was in a mental institution. When he got out he wasn't consulting on cases in an official capacity, so he wasn't getting paid. Come season 3 he has the money to get on a boat (that he seems to own) and go to Italy after an extended hospital stay and months of implied unemployed recuperation. Even if he was living off his savings, you'd think it would have come up at some point.point.
** If you nearly die in the line of duty (multiple times), and you know EVERYTHING they screwed up while investigating murderers, I'm pretty sure the FBI has a retirement package for you, and it would be a fairly hefty one, even after they cover your screwups. Graham lives a simple life and canon (Literature/RedDragon) tells us that he ''fixes'' boats for a living after he retires. That's not addressed in the series, but at the end of the film version of Red Dragon, he's on a boat. It's not outside the realm of possibility that he took an old rustbucket boat and fixed it up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Naka-Choko, Will brings Hannibal meat which he claims is from a terrified Freddie Lounds. Hannibal has very finely attuned senses and he believes this. Will's later shown using a corpse in murder tableaus, and the meat seems to have come from it, but did the fbi sign off on him using a corpse this way? How did he know if it died in a suitably frightened state to convince Hannibal? The person would have had to have died recently and received no medication as they were dying, and also have the same body type as Freddie.

to:

* In Naka-Choko, Will brings Hannibal meat which he claims is from a terrified Freddie Lounds. Hannibal has very finely attuned senses and he believes this. Will's later shown using a corpse in murder tableaus, and the meat seems to have come from it, but did the fbi sign off on him using a corpse this way? How did he know if it died in a suitably frightened state to convince Hannibal? The person would have had to have died recently and received no medication as they were dying, and also have the same body type as Freddie.Freddie.
* How does Will pay for anything? He kept blacking out or having Jack interrupt his classes to have him consult on cases when he was teaching, and then he was in a mental institution. When he got out he wasn't consulting on cases in an official capacity, so he wasn't getting paid. Come season 3 he has the money to get on a boat (that he seems to own) and go to Italy after an extended hospital stay and months of implied unemployed recuperation. Even if he was living off his savings, you'd think it would have come up at some point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Hannibal

to:

** HannibalIt's more that Hannibal wanted to be his friend AND eat him. He saw it as a game, with both he and Will trying to find ways to kill each other. Hannibal believed that Will enjoyed the "Game" too, and that they'd continue to chase and hurt each other. Will's rejection was a denial of the concept that they both enjoyed it, and it also denied Hannibal a further context for hurting or manipulating Will in a way he'd find emotionally satisfying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Dolce, Hannibal was absolutely ready to kill Will. In Digestivo, he is visibly hurt when Will rejects him and even turns himself in because of it. Why did he go from having to eat Will to wanting to be his friend?

to:

* In Dolce, Hannibal was absolutely ready to kill Will. In Digestivo, he is visibly hurt when Will rejects him and even turns himself in because of it. Why did he go from having to eat Will to wanting to be his friend?friend?
** Hannibal
* In Naka-Choko, Will brings Hannibal meat which he claims is from a terrified Freddie Lounds. Hannibal has very finely attuned senses and he believes this. Will's later shown using a corpse in murder tableaus, and the meat seems to have come from it, but did the fbi sign off on him using a corpse this way? How did he know if it died in a suitably frightened state to convince Hannibal? The person would have had to have died recently and received no medication as they were dying, and also have the same body type as Freddie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Kuru is a very specific disease. It doesn't just pop up when someone eats of human flesh, only if they chew on a carrier. And nowadays, that's possibly a few dozen people, all of whom live in Papua New Guinea, not exactly where Hannibal gets his ingredients from.
** Gout: He is not any more at risk than if he were to eat animal meat in a similar quantity, and even then gout is not caused by diet alone. And while he eats mostly meat, he does eat vegetables and dairy as well (accompanying the meat).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I agree. Since it's well-established that Hannibal can actually smell disease on people, he won't have any problems avoiding 'spoiled meat', thus avoiding any illness. As for gout, he was a doctor: he could be already taking the proper medication or treat to avoid the whole 'swelling of extremities' and other symptoms.

to:

*** I agree. Since it's well-established that Hannibal can actually smell disease on people, he won't have any problems avoiding 'spoiled meat', thus avoiding any illness. As for gout, he was a doctor: he could be already taking the proper medication or treat to avoid the whole 'swelling of extremities' and other symptoms.symptoms.
* In Dolce, Hannibal was absolutely ready to kill Will. In Digestivo, he is visibly hurt when Will rejects him and even turns himself in because of it. Why did he go from having to eat Will to wanting to be his friend?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Kuru is a prion disease, and as such Hannibal either needs to generate his own prions or ingest them in some way. In fact, unless he's very unlucky and chooses one of the few people in the United States (or, presumably, all the places in Europe he's been nomming people), his chances of catching a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy of any sort is pretty low, especially since he tends to avoid most of the other possible vectors, ie. animal meats. As for gout, I'm not sure. Maybe he eats his vegetables off screen?

to:

** Kuru is a prion disease, and as such Hannibal either needs to generate his own prions or ingest them in some way. In fact, unless he's very unlucky and chooses one of the few people in the United States (or, presumably, all the places in Europe he's been nomming people), his chances of catching a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy of any sort is pretty low, especially since he tends to avoid most of the other possible vectors, ie. animal meats. As for gout, I'm not sure. Maybe he eats his vegetables off screen?screen?
*** I agree. Since it's well-established that Hannibal can actually smell disease on people, he won't have any problems avoiding 'spoiled meat', thus avoiding any illness. As for gout, he was a doctor: he could be already taking the proper medication or treat to avoid the whole 'swelling of extremities' and other symptoms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
conjecture! :D


* How come Hannibal (or any of his guests) isn't sick with gout and kuru from eating all those human organs?

to:

* How come Hannibal (or any of his guests) isn't sick with gout and kuru from eating all those human organs?organs?
** Kuru is a prion disease, and as such Hannibal either needs to generate his own prions or ingest them in some way. In fact, unless he's very unlucky and chooses one of the few people in the United States (or, presumably, all the places in Europe he's been nomming people), his chances of catching a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy of any sort is pretty low, especially since he tends to avoid most of the other possible vectors, ie. animal meats. As for gout, I'm not sure. Maybe he eats his vegetables off screen?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** You'd also think that any bystanders who saw her may have called emergency services due to how messed up she looks. BystanderEffect?

to:

** You'd also think that any bystanders who saw her may have called emergency services due to how messed up she looks. BystanderEffect?BystanderEffect?
* How come Hannibal (or any of his guests) isn't sick with gout and kuru from eating all those human organs?

Top