Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Columbo

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's not a Headscratcher, it's a character complaint.



* Columbo is Droopy Dog with a police badge. He'll just keep at it until the murderer goes mad and confesses just to get some peace and quiet. It can be a bit of a headscratcher how the bad guys consistently trip up just from annoyance when their livelihood is on the line. But to be fair, some villains are more patient with more proof against them.
* As much as I liked the show, the part that always bugged me was how Columbo would gather evidence and carry it around with him as if it would still be admissable. I think it would be incredibly hard to classify something as evidence if he found it one day and didn't turn it in until three or four days later, while carrying it around in his pocket all that time.

to:

\n* ** As for the shoelace, Columbo is Droopy Dog with makes a police badge. He'll just keep at it until point of showing Milo one of the murderer goes mad and confesses just victim's shoes that he'd tied himself, in order to get some peace and quiet. It can be a bit of a headscratcher demonstrate how the bad guys consistently trip up just from annoyance victim normally tied his laces. This is then contrasted with a photo of the shoes wearing when their livelihood is he was found dead, which are clearly tied differently -- thus demonstrating that someone else had put the shoes on the line. But to victim and tied them. While the right-hand / left-hand thing might be fair, some villains are more patient with more proof against them.
a genuine flub, the episode does clearly establish the broader point that the victim didn't tie his own shoelaces, someone else did.

* As much as I liked the show, the part that always bugged me was how Columbo would gather evidence and carry it around with him as if it would still be admissable.admissible. I think it would be incredibly hard to classify something as evidence if he found it one day and didn't turn it in until three or four days later, while carrying it around in his pocket all that time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The 2.30 clock chime blows his alibi apart; he claimed to be in the owner's box making a phone-call at the time of the murder, and the fact that the clock didn't chime in the background proves he wasn't.
** As for why the manager kills the owner, he clearly doesn't like the guy and, well, it's a murder mystery series. ''Someone'' has to whack someone else, otherwise there's no story. Sometimes, it's some grandiose motive, other times it's just petty dislike.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Considering that the ending reveals that Lt. Columbo was all too aware that the perp had ill-intent towards him and his wife, it's quite likely that he made ample arrangements to ensure her safety and made her sufficiently aware of the situation while trying not to upset or panic her too much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owner) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. However there can be the impression of a MissingStepsPlan with Paul. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar petty reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.

to:

** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owner) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. However there can be the impression of a MissingStepsPlan with Paul. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar petty reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owner) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.

to:

** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owner) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. However there can be the impression of a MissingStepsPlan with Paul. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar petty reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owmer) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.

to:

** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owmer) owner) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.

Added: 557

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* What was the motive in "The Most Crucial Game"? The team manager kills the team owner because...? All we seem to know beforehand is that the manager is setting up the owner with various women behind the owner's wife's back, and the owner's attorney planet bugs to try and catch proof of this but got nothing whatsoever to prove anything(at most a single implication out of numerous phone recordings). I also don't get the 2:30 PM phone chime(the one piece of evidence- or lack thereof- that blows the manager's alibi from a phone recording). This one seems to lack any explanations for much of what we see.

to:

* What was the motive in "The Most Crucial Game"? The team manager kills the team owner because...? All we seem to know beforehand is that the manager is setting up the owner with various women behind the owner's wife's back, and the owner's attorney planet plants bugs to try and catch proof of this but got nothing whatsoever to prove anything(at most a single implication out of numerous phone recordings). I also don't get the 2:30 PM phone chime(the one piece of evidence- or lack thereof- that blows the manager's alibi from a phone recording). This one seems to lack any explanations for much of what we see.see.
** This one seems like Paul Hanlon (the manager) did it out of disliking how Eric Wagner (the owmer) was acting as a poor owner of the company by spending a lot of time binging, partying and laying around. He might have done it partly ForTheEvulz may as he seems to have little respect for him, but supposedly he planned to take advantage of the ownership vacuum left by Eric's death. Interestingly, Jarvis in the previous episode kills his nephew for similar reasons, unable to stand the idea of him squandering his portion of the ransom money on his wife.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* What was the motive in "The Most Crucial Game"? The team manager kills the team owner because...? All we seem to know beforehand is that the manager is setting up the owner with various women behind the owner's wife's back, and the owner's attorney planet bugs to try and catch proof of this but got nothing whatsoever to prove anything(at most a single implication out of numerous phone recordings). I also don't get the 2:30 PM phone chime(the one piece of evidence- or lack thereof- that blows the manager's alibi from a phone recording). This one seems to lack any explanations for much of what we see.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** At the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (apparent homicides, suicides, other such sudden unexplained deaths and so on) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hidemann's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request that the coroner orders an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** At the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the authorities deem it necessary, usually because the person dies has died under obviously suspicious or unnatural circumstances requiring investigation (apparent homicides, suicides, other such sudden unexplained deaths and so on) on), or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hidemann's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request that the coroner orders an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Did Columbo's offscreen wife even know that someone was trying to kill her during the events of "Rest in Peace, Mrs. Columbo"? Or did her husband wait to drop this unpleasant fact on her until after arresting the perp?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Wesley was trying to frame Lydia for Adam Evans's death, remember. He planted the digitalis in Adam's drink to make it look like Lydia poisoned him. It's likely the reason David agreed to help Wesley get rid of the body was because he was afraid of the attention they'd be getting from the tabloids, not knowing Wesley's motives.

to:

** Wesley was trying to frame Lydia for Adam Evans's death, remember. He planted the digitalis in Adam's drink to make it look like Lydia poisoned him. It's likely the reason David agreed to help Wesley get rid of the body was because he was afraid of the attention they'd be getting from the tabloids, not knowing Wesley's motives. Once David found out the truth about what Wesley up to, he was probably willing to testify.



** I don't remember the specifics of the episode, but assuming the damage was cosmetic Collier could have had it quickly repaired before Columbo managed to investigate it.

to:

** I don't remember the specifics of the episode, but assuming the damage was cosmetic Collier could have had it quickly repaired before Columbo managed got to investigate it.him.



** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (apparent homicides, suicides, other such sudden unexplained deaths and so on) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request that the coroner orders an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at At the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (apparent homicides, suicides, other such sudden unexplained deaths and so on) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's Hidemann's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request that the coroner orders an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Wesley was trying to frame Lydia for Adam Evans's death, remember. He planted the digitalis in Adam's drink to make it look like Lydia poisoned him. It's likely the reason David agreed to help Wesley get rid of the body was because he was afraid of the attention they'd be getting from the tabloids, not knowing Wesley's motives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Uneasy Lies The Crown", Wesley Corman and David Sherwin find a dead man, appearently because a heart attack, in Wesley's property. Instead of calling 911, they move the corpse, put it on a car, and push the car off a cliff so it would look as a car accident, and no one would know that the man had been in Wesley's house. When Columbo confronts them about moving the body, they both confess. Columbo just thanks them and proceeds his investigation. Shouldn't he have had them arrested for obstruction to the justice and, maybe, body desecration? At the end, Wesley Corman is found guilty of murder, but David Sherwin, even if he was unaware that Wesley was the murderer, consciously and willingly tried to manipulate evidences. However he does seem to simply get way with it.

to:

* In "Uneasy Lies The Crown", Wesley Corman and David Sherwin find a dead man, appearently because a heart attack, in Wesley's property. Instead of calling 911, they move the corpse, put it on a car, and push the car off a cliff so it would look as a car accident, and no one would know that the man had been in Wesley's house. When Columbo confronts them about moving the body, they both confess. Columbo just thanks them and proceeds his investigation. Shouldn't he have had them arrested for obstruction to the justice and, maybe, body desecration? At the end, Wesley Corman is found guilty of murder, confesses having poisoned the victim, but David Sherwin, even if he was unaware that the man had been killed, and Wesley was the murderer, consciously and willingly tried to manipulate evidences. However he does seem to simply get way with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add headscratcher

Added DiffLines:

* In "Uneasy Lies The Crown", Wesley Corman and David Sherwin find a dead man, appearently because a heart attack, in Wesley's property. Instead of calling 911, they move the corpse, put it on a car, and push the car off a cliff so it would look as a car accident, and no one would know that the man had been in Wesley's house. When Columbo confronts them about moving the body, they both confess. Columbo just thanks them and proceeds his investigation. Shouldn't he have had them arrested for obstruction to the justice and, maybe, body desecration? At the end, Wesley Corman is found guilty of murder, but David Sherwin, even if he was unaware that Wesley was the murderer, consciously and willingly tried to manipulate evidences. However he does seem to simply get way with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** His motive is never firmly established and that is a common criticism of the episode, but the synopsis on TheOtherWiki says it's something about shifting power within his government, and it can be inferred from the episode proper that Hasan is trying to a) make himself a closer advisor to the new monarch, and b) poison the new monarch against the student radicals and their politics, so quite possibly the security chief was just a cold-blooded sacrifice to achieve those political ends.

Added: 652

Changed: 1685

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** We should also remember the whole point of the series. The point isn't to see the criminals going through the court system to a conviction or not ''al la'' ''Series/LawAndOrder'' or something; it's simply to see how Columbo is going to figure out how the murderer committed the crime and what flaws are going to trip them up. Look at it this way; we don't need to see a conviction because we already ''know'' that this person is the murderer. Whether they get convicted or not, we have clear evidence that the person is the murderer because we've ''seen'' them do it. But the murderer is always convinced that no one will ever figure out how they did it, that they've committed a flawless, fool-proof crime that no one could ever possibly figure out or link to them. When Columbo does, whether they're ultimately convicted or not, they'll now have to live with the fact that their so-called perfect murder wasn't anything of the kind and at least one other person knows full well that they're a murdering scumbag, and to add insult to injury it's the scruffy little nobody they were convinced was a complete dimwit. Given what egotistical blowhards a lot of these murderers are, that has to chafe just a little bit.

to:

** We should also remember the whole point of the series. The point This isn't to see a mystery where the criminals going through the court system point is to a conviction figure out who did it, like Franchise/SherlockHolmes or not ''al la'' Literature/HerculePoirot, or to follow a criminal investigation from beginning to end like ''Series/LawAndOrder'' or something; it's simply to see how Columbo ''Series/HomicideLifeOnTheStreet''. The point of ''Columbo'' is going to figure out how that the murderer viewer already ''knows'' who committed the crime, because they've seen them do it. We're watching not to figure the mystery out, but to watch ''Columbo'' figure it out; what are the essential flaws in the crime that the murderer has overlooked but Columbo hasn't? Seeing whether the murderer gets convicted or not will ultimately add nothing to the experience, because either way the viewer already knows that the murderer is guilty and what flaws are going to trip them up. Look at it this way; we don't doesn't need to see a conviction jury spell it out for them. The killer (usually) acquiesces when Columbo reveals how they did it because we already ''know'' that this person is that's the murderer. Whether they get convicted or not, we have clear evidence point where the viewer has now seen everything that the person is story has to tell them, and the murderer because we've ''seen'' them do it. But writers have to finish it somehow.
** Also,
the murderer is always convinced that no one will ever figure out how they did it, that they've committed a flawless, fool-proof crime that no one could ever possibly figure out or link to them. When Columbo does, whether they're ultimately convicted or not, they'll now have to live with the fact that their so-called perfect murder wasn't anything of the kind and at least one other person knows full well that they're a murdering scumbag, and to add insult to injury it's the scruffy little nobody they were convinced was a complete dimwit. Given what egotistical blowhards a lot of these murderers are, that has to chafe just a little bit.



** Also, it's fiction. RuleOfDrama, guys and girls. It's simply a way of giving the story we've just seen a reasonably satisfying ending.

to:

** Also, it's fiction. RuleOfDrama, guys and girls. It's simply a way of giving the story we've just seen a reasonably satisfying ending. The killer basically saying "Okay, you beat me," is essentially the writer's way of saying "Show's over, folks, nothing more to see here."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (homicide, sudden unexplained death, etc.) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request the coroner order an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (homicide, (apparent homicides, suicides, other such sudden unexplained death, etc.) deaths and so on) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request that the coroner order orders an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, it's fiction. RuleOfDrama, guys and girls. It's simply a way of giving the story we've just seen a reasonably satisfying ending.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Don't you think that by the fifth or so time that Columbo pulled that [[Main/ObfuscatingStupidity ObfuscatingStupidity]] nonsense that news about it would start getting around the underworld?

to:

* Don't you think that by the fifth or so time that Columbo pulled that [[Main/ObfuscatingStupidity ObfuscatingStupidity]] ObfuscatingStupidity nonsense that news about it would start getting around the underworld?

Added: 305

Changed: 9

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Most of the people we see Columbo tangling with were hardly in a position to get the word from the underworld, to be fair. Its not like Dr. Rich Smugasshole, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon to the stars, is necessarily going to be getting weekly updates from Gus Streetthug, goon for hire, on police strategy and which lieutenants he should avoid being assigned to the intricate murder he's planning.

to:

** Most of the people we see Columbo tangling with were hardly in a position to get the word from the underworld, to be fair. Its not like Dr. Rich Smugasshole, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon to the stars, is necessarily going to be getting weekly updates from Gus Streetthug, Streetcrook, goon for hire, on police strategy and which lieutenants he should avoid being assigned to the intricate murder he's planning.


Added DiffLines:

** And for that matter, even the kind of criminals Columbo comes up against have limited ability to influence precisely which detectives the LAPD is going to assign to investigate a crime they've committed. Even if the word spreads about Columbo, there's not really a heck of a lot they can do about him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I don't remember the specifics of the episode, but assuming the damage was cosmetic Collier could have had it quickly repaired before Columbo managed to investigate it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also worth noting that many of the suspects actually do stop being fooled by Columbo's "shabby dimwit" schtick somewhere around the second "Oh, just one more thing...", but by that point there's not really a lot they can do about it since he's already got his hooks into them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Most of the people we see Columbo tangling with were hardly in a position to get the word from the underworld, to be fair. Its not like Dr. Rich Smugasshole, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon to the stars, is necessarily going to be getting weekly updates on police strategy from Joe Streetthug.

to:

** Most of the people we see Columbo tangling with were hardly in a position to get the word from the underworld, to be fair. Its not like Dr. Rich Smugasshole, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon to the stars, is necessarily going to be getting weekly updates from Gus Streetthug, goon for hire, on police strategy from Joe Streetthug.and which lieutenants he should avoid being assigned to the intricate murder he's planning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Most of the people we see Columbo tangling with were hardly in a position to get the word from the underworld, to be fair. Its not like Dr. Rich Smugasshole, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon to the stars, is necessarily going to be getting weekly updates on police strategy from Joe Streetthug.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (homicide, sudden unexplained death, etc.) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request the coroner order an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (homicide, sudden unexplained death, etc.) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious or unexpected enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request the coroner order an autopsy to be performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances or if the victim's family otherwise requests one, and since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means an autopsy is likely to be conducted if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't necessarily performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances requiring investigation (homicide, sudden unexplained death, etc.) or if the victim's family otherwise requests one, and since one. Since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means he's likely to request the coroner order an autopsy is likely to be conducted performed if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under suspicious circumstances, and since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means an autopsy is likely to be conducted if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under obviously suspicious circumstances, circumstances or if the victim's family otherwise requests one, and since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he has to murder the nurse who discovers his plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means an autopsy is likely to be conducted if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

Added: 135

Changed: 389

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Besides in this particular story, the confession played off the play that was being preformed by the couple ("Out out damned spot").



** Besides in this particular story, the confession played off the play that was being preformed by the couple ("Out out damned spot").

to:

** Besides in this particular story, *** Yes. These are not hardened criminals. When their alibi is torn to shreds, they know they've been beaten, and they are not the confession played off the play that was being preformed by the couple ("Out out damned spot").type simply to brazen it out. Moreover, Columbo has already talked them through every excuse and evasion they can come up with. When they are actually interrogated, what kind of story could they possibly give?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under suspicious circumstances, and since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he first murders the nurse who discovers his corruption, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means an autopsy is likely to be conducted if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.

to:

** If memory serves, at the time Dr. Mayfield comes up with the plan involving dissolving suture, he's not expecting there to be an autopsy. Autopsies generally aren't performed automatically upon someone dying, they're usually only conducted if the person dies under suspicious circumstances, and since Dr. Hidemann is well-known to have an existing heart condition and no one (at that point at least) suspects Dr. Mayfield of having any reason to murder him, Dr. Mayfield is initially banking on no one finding the circumstances around Dr. Hideman's death to be suspicious enough to require an autopsy. As far as Mayfield believes, it would just be assumed that Dr. Hidemann simply died of his pre-existing condition and the surgery wasn't enough to save him. Unexpected and unfortunate, perhaps, but not uncommon or unusual; heart surgeries don't always work. The whole reason his scheme gets foiled is because he first murders has to murder the nurse who discovers his corruption, plot, which brings in Columbo, who discovers the reasons why Mayfield might want Hidemann dead, which means an autopsy is likely to be conducted if anything happens to Hidemann, which means that Mayfield's scheme is likely to be exposed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Actually, this point is a bit of a myth- having one eye would not interfere with aiming skills. Careful aiming with gun sights can be done with one eye closed, and anyone using a scope(such as a sniper) will be using one eye by default. HOWEVER, depending on whether or not his good eye is opposite to his preferred hand, then things may be a bit complicated- while one could get around that with practice, it's suggested Columbo hated to even hold or fire a gun, meaning he'd be out of practice either way, one eye or two.

Top