Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Chess

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Well, the castling rule just works that way. And moving the rook first could be be seen like you're gauging your opponent's reaction without committing yourself, similar how you can't attach a raise after you've called in poker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

****pawns originally moved only one square. All other pieces that can move multiple squares can still do it. To speed up the game pawns were allowed to move two on their first move. This allowed for pawns to bypass being attacked, to correct it, en passant was created. If you don't understand en passant, use the rule that pawns can only move one square at all times. It will make sense why it exists. Specially if you need to use it to clear out pawns.

Changed: 24

Removed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Even {{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.

to:

**** *** Even {{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.



*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's [[TheBeard beard]]. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

----
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>

to:

*** Seconded. ** Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice Creator/TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's [[TheBeard beard]]. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

----
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
background.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Wait, that just makes it worse. Now casting is made of ''two illegal moves'': moving the king ''two spaces'', and moving the rook ''through an occupied space!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

to:

*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard.[[TheBeard beard]]. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate (because juniors can't see six moves in advance). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance it is common to promote to castle rather then queen simply to make sure the oppenents king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.

to:

**** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate (because juniors can't see six moves in advance). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance instance, it is common to promote to castle rook rather then queen queen, simply to make sure the oppenents opponent's king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate(because juniors can't see six moves in advanced). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance it is common to promote to castle rather then queen simply to make sure the oppenents king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.

to:

**** It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate(because checkmate (because juniors can't see six moves in advanced).advance). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance it is common to promote to castle rather then queen simply to make sure the oppenents king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** But why doesn't the above realism logic apply to other pieces?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Another consideration is that, depending on the time and place, depicting the actual capture of the king was taboo. The check and checkmate rules ensure that the game ends before the king is captured.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* It is the in-universe King of the real life World Champion the ruler of the [in-universe] world, or at least a very powerful overlord; because, you know, he just defeated some of the most powerful other lords out there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

****It's not particularly frequent. The most frequent result in master level is resignation, at junior level it is checkmate(because juniors can't see six moves in advanced). What makes the stalemate rule an improvement is that [[WeHaveReserves attrition]] isn't a sure path to victory the way it is in checkers. Attrition is useful but no matter how far ground down a player, the superior player still has to watch. It also makes for counterintuitive nuances. For instance it is common to promote to castle rather then queen simply to make sure the oppenents king will have more places to run to until you are finally ready.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** What is so great about a stalemate anyway? If the most frequent outcome of a game is that nobody wins, it sounds like a major design flaw.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If we really care for realism, then chess is supposed to simulate a real battle, and everything takes place in real time. The alternating turns are just an abstraction, and one move (one for white, one for black) happens the same time. So, the pawn tries to move two spaces, and is captured before it can complete the move. This makes sense, as the en passant rule can only be used immediately after the double pawn move, if your next move is not an en passant, you will not be allowed to perform it later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Redundancy, grammar and spelling mistakes and general formatting problems


** Somehow it's okay that other pieces can move past others magically, but how dare a pawn attempt advancing past another - we have to give the other piece a special ability to capture it without even capturing it!
*** Please note that only pawns are able to capture ''en passant''. Yes its a magical ability, but so is being able to move twice in one move.

to:

** Somehow Somehow, it's okay that other pieces can move past others magically, but how dare a pawn attempt advancing past another - we have to give the other piece pieces a special ability to capture it without even capturing it!
*** Please note that only pawns are able to capture ''en passant''. Yes its Yes, it's a magical ability, but so is being able to move twice in one move.



** In the interest of being a spoilsport (and a giant geek), the "Pawn moves two spaces in their first move" was created for the sole reason to quick up the start of the game (since otherwice the game tended to be 1) e2-e3, e7-e6 2) e3-e4, e6-e5). It wasn't intended to give any strategical boost. It then took about five seconds for about five million chess players to figure out that the until-then strategy of putting a pawn at 4/5 file in order to stop the two pawns that only could move to the two squares that he was attacking from moving was side-stepped by them simply double-move to the side of the attacking piece. The En Passant rule was an ObviousRulePatch to eliminate this. [Cue GIJoe music].
* Prior to 1972 it was possible to Castle using a promoted Rook. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_chess_problem#Offbeat_interpretations_of_the_rules_of_chess Wikipedia]] notes how this would work using a Rook on the same file as the King, but how would it work if the Rook and King were on different files?

to:

** In the interest of being a spoilsport (and a giant geek), the "Pawn moves two spaces in their first move" was created for the sole reason to quick up hasten the start of the game (since otherwice the game tended to be 1) e2-e3, e7-e6 2) e3-e4, e6-e5). It wasn't intended to give any strategical boost. It then took about five seconds for about five million chess players to figure out that the until-then strategy of putting a pawn at 4/5 file in order to stop the two pawns that only could only move to the two squares that he was attacking from moving was side-stepped by them simply double-move to the side of the attacking piece. The En Passant rule was an ObviousRulePatch to eliminate this. [Cue GIJoe music].
* Prior to 1972 1972, it was possible to Castle using a promoted Rook. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_chess_problem#Offbeat_interpretations_of_the_rules_of_chess Wikipedia]] notes how this would work using a Rook on the same file as the King, but how would it work if the Rook and the King were on different files?



*** You're slightly mistaken, it doesn't matter whether the Castling rook is under attack or passes though any attacked squares.

to:

*** You're slightly mistaken, it doesn't matter whether the Castling rook is under attack or passes passing though any attacked squares.
squares.



** Because [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch-move_rule touch-move]].

to:

** Because of [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch-move_rule touch-move]].






*** The rule that it's illegal to ignore check (and thus move into check) makes the game a little deeper by making stalemate possible (when one side has no legal moves to make on their turn, it's a draw). A basic example is Queen and King vs King. With this rule in effect a careless player can stalemate the enemy King by using the Queen to completely restrict but not check it. Whereas if the king were allowed to move into check, almost all stalemates would be impossible, and in the example the side with the Queen would still win by taking the enemy King once it was forced to move into check. Famous games have occurred where one side, completely lost, forcibly gives away all their material in a series of checks, and after the last piece is taken, saves the game through stalemate which suddenly appears.

to:

*** The rule that it's illegal to ignore check (and thus move into check) makes the game a little deeper by making stalemate possible (when one side has no legal moves to make on their turn, it's a draw). A basic example is Queen and King vs King. With this rule in effect effect, a careless player can stalemate the enemy King by using the Queen to completely restrict but not check it. Whereas if the king were was allowed to move into check, almost all stalemates would be impossible, and and, in the example example, the side with the Queen would still win by taking the enemy King once it was forced to move into check. Famous games have occurred where one side, completely lost, forcibly gives away all their material in a series of checks, and after the last piece is taken, saves the game through the stalemate which that suddenly appears.



** Could he ever have had a functioning relationship with her if he somehow managed to resolve his [[FreudianExcuse parental issues?]]

to:

** Could he ever have had a functioning relationship with her if he somehow managed to resolve his [[FreudianExcuse parental issues?]]



** Surely a savvy, worldly character is more compelling than a thinly veiled DamselInDistress? Was he doing a ViewersAreMorons because "an (outwardly) self-confident woman like her wouldn't stand for that kind of crap."?
*** While this ThisTroper is on the subject, is Freddie meant to be a self-centred {{Jerkass}} or is he just downright emotionally abusive?
** ThisTroper thinks that depends on whether you want the show to be a mass of morally grey {{Jerkass}}es or black-and-white. Anatoly isn't exactly free of {{Jerkass}} traits either.

* What do they Embassy underlings mean when they tell Anatoly "Don't forget the guys who cut your keys."?
** "Cut your keys" as in "made your keys" as in, let you into the country. They're the ones who do all the paperwork necessary for Anatoly defecting, and don't want this to go amiss.

* In ''The Deal (No Deal)'', Anatoly makes perfectly clear that he isn't willing to intentionally lose the World Championship. So why, in ''Talking Chess'', is Freddie trying to convince him to win?

to:

** Surely a savvy, worldly character is more compelling than a thinly veiled DamselInDistress? Was he doing a assuming ViewersAreMorons because "an (outwardly) self-confident woman like her wouldn't stand for that kind of crap."?
crap"?
*** While this ThisTroper This Troper is on the subject, is Freddie meant to be a self-centred {{Jerkass}} or is he just downright emotionally abusive?
** ThisTroper This Troper thinks that depends on whether you want the show to be a mass of morally grey {{Jerkass}}es or black-and-white. Anatoly isn't exactly free of {{Jerkass}} traits either.

* What do they the Embassy underlings mean when they tell Anatoly "Don't forget the guys who cut your keys."?
** "Cut your keys" keys", as in "made your keys" keys", as in, in let you into the country. They're the ones who do all the paperwork necessary for Anatoly defecting, and don't want this to go amiss.

* In ''The Deal (No Deal)'', Anatoly makes it perfectly clear that he isn't willing to intentionally lose the World Championship. So why, in ''Talking Chess'', is Freddie trying to convince him to win?



*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form its taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of InternalisedHomophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

to:

*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form its it's taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of InternalisedHomophobia, Internalised Homophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The rule that it's illegal to ignore (and thus move into check) makes the game a little deeper by making stalemate possible (when one side has no moves to make on their turn, it's a draw). A basic example is Queen and King vs King. With this rule in effect a careless player can stalemate the enemy King by using the Queen to completely restrict but not check it. Whereas if the king were allowed to move into check, almost all stalemates would be impossible, and in the example the side with the Queen would still win by taking the enemy King once it was forced to move into check. Famous games have occurred where one side, completely lost, forcibly gives away all their material in a series of checks, and after the last piece is taken, saves the game through stalemate which suddenly appears.

to:

*** The rule that it's illegal to ignore check (and thus move into check) makes the game a little deeper by making stalemate possible (when one side has no legal moves to make on their turn, it's a draw). A basic example is Queen and King vs King. With this rule in effect a careless player can stalemate the enemy King by using the Queen to completely restrict but not check it. Whereas if the king were allowed to move into check, almost all stalemates would be impossible, and in the example the side with the Queen would still win by taking the enemy King once it was forced to move into check. Famous games have occurred where one side, completely lost, forcibly gives away all their material in a series of checks, and after the last piece is taken, saves the game through stalemate which suddenly appears.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The rule that it's illegal to ignore (and thus move into check) makes the game a little deeper by making stalemate possible (when one side has no moves to make on their turn, it's a draw). A basic example is Queen and King vs King. With this rule in effect a careless player can stalemate the enemy King by using the Queen to completely restrict but not check it. Whereas if the king were allowed to move into check, almost all stalemates would be impossible, and in the example the side with the Queen would still win by taking the enemy King once it was forced to move into check. Famous games have occurred where one side, completely lost, forcibly gives away all their material in a series of checks, and after the last piece is taken, saves the game through stalemate which suddenly appears.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form its taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem to far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of InternalisedHomophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.

to:

*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form its taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem to too far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of InternalisedHomophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Seconded. Anatoly suggests this to Florence in the ConceptAlbum during ''Quartet'' and she reacts defensively. Also, in the documentary that was made about the album while it was being recorded in Stockholm, TimRice seems to suggest that the relationship between Florence and Freddie was much more business-like than the form its taken on in the various stage adaptations, so it doesn't seem to far-fetched to suggest that the initial plan was for Florence to be Freddie's beard. If you take the view that his actions in the show are the result of InternalisedHomophobia, it could be a nod to Bobby Fischer's notorious reputation for anti-Semitism despite his own Jewish background.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Depending on the version, this could show how much Freddie wants Florence back; he's even willing to let them drag him around for a shot at her. Besides, he switches camps later when he helps Anatole to beat Vigand.

to:

** Depending on the version, this could show how much Freddie wants Florence back; he's even willing to let them drag him around for a shot at her. Besides, he switches camps later when he helps Anatole Anatoly to beat Vigand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Maybe it's an implication that he's gay? Clearly he has issues about that topic from "Pity the Child".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* Why is Freddie so offended by the reporters' implication that Florence is only his second because she's sleeping with him ("how come your second's a girl, lover boy?")? It seems like that would affect ''her'' reputation rather than his ({{Double Standard}}s being what they are), and he hardly seems empathetic enough to care about that. Yet he has a more severe reaction to that than to any of the other unkind (if fully deserved) things the reporters say to/about him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Technically, the rules do not require you to deal with check: you can resign instead. Since the only alternative to dealing with being in check is to lose, not dealing with being in check is effectively to resign.

to:

** Technically, the rules do not require you to deal with check: you can resign instead. Since the only alternative to dealing with being in check is to lose, not dealing with being in check is effectively to resign. There are certain customs, however, about the proper way to resign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Technically, the rules do not require you to deal with check: you can resign instead. Since the only alternative to dealing with being in check is to lose, not dealing with being in check is effectively to resign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* The rules for check and checkmate have always struck me as somewhat pointless. Instead of "you must deal with check because the rules say you have to", why not just leave it as "you really ought to deal with check because otherwise your opponent will take your king next turn"?

Added: 789

Changed: 218

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Depending on the version, this could show how much Freddie wants Florence back; he's even willing to let them drag him around for a shot at her. Besides, he switches camps later when he helps Anatole to beat Vigand.


Added DiffLines:

**There's two different ways I've heard that scene interpreted:
*** That Freddie is switching tactics and trying a new way to get Florence back. He's realized that Florence will never forgive Anatoly for choosing chess over her, and Freddie wants to facilitate that break-up (this also depends on how Florence is played when Walter tells her about her father; I've seen performances where she refuses to go along with him, and ones where she sinks, to the floor, beaten).
*** Or that Freddie is seriously sick of all the political machinations and drama surrounding the game. In act one, his posturing caused him to lose the match and lose Florence, and it rendered him little better than a puppet in act two. Freddie just wants to see the guy that beat him finally play some freaking chess.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


*In ''The Deal (No Deal)'', Anatoly makes perfectly clear that he isn't willing to intentionally lose the World Championship. So why, in ''Talking Chess'', is Freddie trying to convince him to win?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** In the interest of being a spoilsport (and a giant geek), the "Pawn moves two spaces in their first move" was created for the sole reason to quick up the start of the game (since otherwice the game tended to be 1) e2-e3, e7-e6 2) e3-e4, e6-e5). It wasn't intended to give any strategical boost. It then took about five seconds for about five million chess players to figure out that the until-then strategy of putting a pawn at 4/5 file in order to stop the two pawns that only could move to the two squares that he was attacking from moving was side-stepped by them simply double-move to the side of the attacking piece. The En Passant rule was an ObviousRulePatch to eliminate this. [Cue GIJoe music].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** I think it does, but with all the stuff going on around him, Vigaand is just better than him. Until Anatoly calms down and focuses on actually playing the game, he's just not capable of winning



** Probably a lot of it is his own basic arrogance. He’s so sure he’s in control of the game that he can’t imagine himself as anybody else’s pawn. (And he’s also got a lot of built-up contempt and resentment against women in general, which would more than likely make him distrust Florence’s advice on principle.)

to:

** Probably a lot of it is his own basic arrogance. He’s He's so sure he’s he's in control of the game that he can’t can't imagine himself as anybody else’s else's pawn. (And he’s he's also got a lot of built-up contempt and resentment against women in general, which would more than likely make him distrust Florence’s Florence's advice on principle.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The''en passant'' rule was developed after someone came up with the "pawns can move two spaces on their first turn" one and was put in as a fix so that they couldn't get past attackers magically. It's difficult to explain without a board, but you get the idea.

to:

** The''en The ''en passant'' rule was developed after someone came up with the "pawns can move two spaces on their first turn" one and was put in as a fix so that they couldn't get past attackers magically. It's difficult to explain without a board, but you get the idea.

Added: 263

Changed: 3917

Removed: 248

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A few edits to differentiate the the two sections.


[[WMG: The En Passant rule makes no... Wait, why is the rest of these about a musical?!!]]
* Well, there's a musical called ''[[{{Theatre/Chess}} Chess]]''. This troper wishes she could figure out how to separate this from the {{Chess}} one.
* Incidentally, if you were curious, the ''en passant'' rule was developed after someone came up with the "pawns can move two spaces on their first turn" one and was put in as a fix so that they couldn't get past attackers magically. It's difficult to explain without a board, but you get the idea.

to:

[[WMG: !!The Game

*
The En Passant Passant rule makes no... Wait, why is the rest of these about a musical?!!]]
* Well, there's a musical called ''[[{{Theatre/Chess}} Chess]]''. This troper wishes she could figure out how to separate this from the {{Chess}} one.
* Incidentally, if you were curious, the ''en
no sense.
** The''en
passant'' rule was developed after someone came up with the "pawns can move two spaces on their first turn" one and was put in as a fix so that they couldn't get past attackers magically. It's difficult to explain without a board, but you get the idea.



**** The oppression of the pawns is one of the great social outrages of the western boardgame world.
***** Even {{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.

[[WMG: Prior to 1972 it was possible to Castle using a promoted Rook.]]
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_chess_problem#Offbeat_interpretations_of_the_rules_of_chess Wikipedia]] notes how this would work using a Rook on the same file as the King, but how would it work if the Rook and King were on different files?

to:

**** *** The oppression of the pawns is one of the great social outrages of the western boardgame world.
***** **** Even {{Mafalda}} [[http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MeK0jFXbWMg/SglMTe3ZtHI/AAAAAAAAAEY/-y5vLAvRXiw/s1600-h/mafalda+ajedrez+comunismo.gif realized]] it.

[[WMG: * Prior to 1972 it was possible to Castle using a promoted Rook.]]
Rook. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke_chess_problem#Offbeat_interpretations_of_the_rules_of_chess Wikipedia]] notes how this would work using a Rook on the same file as the King, but how would it work if the Rook and King were on different files?



[[WMG: Why is Castling considered a King move, but not a Rook move?]]
Because [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch-move_rule touch-move]].
*That in no way explains why Castling isn't considered both a King move and a Rook move.
**Well, it ''is'' -- I'm just saying that the only reason to consider it ''primarily'' a King move is because that's the piece you have to move first.
* Let me rephrase my question, why do the rules require you to move the King first when you're Castling?
** Because your move is over after you make a legal move and release the piece you moved - and moving your rook next to your king is a legal move. When you move your king two squares, it's clear that your move is not yet over when you release the king.

to:

[[WMG: * Why is Castling considered a King move, but not a Rook move?]]
move?
**
Because [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch-move_rule touch-move]].
*That *** That in no way explains why Castling isn't considered both a King move and a Rook move.
**Well, **** Well, it ''is'' -- I'm just saying that the only reason to consider it ''primarily'' a King move is because that's the piece you have to move first.
* ** Let me rephrase my question, why do the rules require you to move the King first when you're Castling?
** *** Because your move is over after you make a legal move and release the piece you moved - and moving your rook next to your king is a legal move. When you move your king two squares, it's clear that your move is not yet over when you release the king.
king.




[[WMG: Why does it not occur to Anatoly to win until ''Talking Chess''?]]
*Obviously, you've never met Korchnoi.

[[WMG: In the Concept Album, what's the "news" that Freddie has for Florence at the end? It wasn't very clear.]]
* The news is about her father, but it's left to the audience to decide if he's dead or alive.

[[WMG: Why would Freddie be so complicit in being used by Walter and Molokov? He didn't take orders from Florence when she asked him to make nice with the press.]]
*Probably a lot of it is his own basic arrogance. He’s so sure he’s in control of the game that he can’t imagine himself as anybody else’s pawn. (And he’s also got a lot of built-up contempt and resentment against women in general, which would more than likely make him distrust Florence’s advice on principle.)
**Could he ever have had a functioning relationship with her if he somehow managed to resolve his [[FreudianExcuse parental issues?]]

[[WMG: Why did Richard Nelson turn Florence into such a wallflower?]]
*Surely a savvy, worldly character is more compelling than a thinly veiled DamselInDistress? Was he doing a ViewersAreMorons because "an (outwardly) self-confident woman like her wouldn't stand for that kind of crap."?
*While this ThisTroper is on the subject, is Freddie meant to be a self-centred {{Jerkass}} or is he just downright emotionally abusive?
**ThisTroper thinks that depends on whether you want the show to be a mass of morally grey {{Jerkass}}es or black-and-white. Anatoly isn't exactly free of {{Jerkass}} traits either.

[[WMG: What do they Embassy underlings mean when they tell Anatoly "Don't forget the guys who cut your keys."?]]
* "Cut your keys" as in "made your keys" as in, let you into the country. They're the ones who do all the paperwork necessary for Anatoly defecting, and don't want this to go amiss.

to:

\n[[WMG: !!The Play

*
Why does it not occur to Anatoly to win until ''Talking Chess''?]]
*Obviously,
Chess''?
** Obviously,
you've never met Korchnoi.

[[WMG: * In the Concept Album, what's the "news" that Freddie has for Florence at the end? It wasn't very clear.]]
*
clear.
**
The news is about her father, but it's left to the audience to decide if he's dead or alive.

[[WMG: * Why would Freddie be so complicit in being used by Walter and Molokov? He didn't take orders from Florence when she asked him to make nice with the press.]]
*Probably
press.
** Probably
a lot of it is his own basic arrogance. He’s so sure he’s in control of the game that he can’t imagine himself as anybody else’s pawn. (And he’s also got a lot of built-up contempt and resentment against women in general, which would more than likely make him distrust Florence’s advice on principle.)
**Could ** Could he ever have had a functioning relationship with her if he somehow managed to resolve his [[FreudianExcuse parental issues?]]

[[WMG: * Why did Richard Nelson turn Florence into such a wallflower?]]
*Surely
wallflower?
** Surely
a savvy, worldly character is more compelling than a thinly veiled DamselInDistress? Was he doing a ViewersAreMorons because "an (outwardly) self-confident woman like her wouldn't stand for that kind of crap."?
*While *** While this ThisTroper is on the subject, is Freddie meant to be a self-centred {{Jerkass}} or is he just downright emotionally abusive?
**ThisTroper ** ThisTroper thinks that depends on whether you want the show to be a mass of morally grey {{Jerkass}}es or black-and-white. Anatoly isn't exactly free of {{Jerkass}} traits either.

[[WMG: * What do they Embassy underlings mean when they tell Anatoly "Don't forget the guys who cut your keys."?]]
*
"?
**
"Cut your keys" as in "made your keys" as in, let you into the country. They're the ones who do all the paperwork necessary for Anatoly defecting, and don't want this to go amiss.
amiss.



<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
----

to:

<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
----
<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>

Top