Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / AtlasShrugged

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And that's exactly what bothers me about the book, Rand, Objectivists and many libertarians in general. Deregulate, let the people build, get out of the way, get government out of the workplace and let the great men do what they want. We've lived in that world before: welcome to the 19th century Industrial Age, when the skies of London were black with smoke, when children worked in coal mines and workers who lost their limbs in industrial accidents were simply thrown out on the street as beggers for the crime of being useless now. There's no capitalist incentive to protect those workers at all, not when it cuts into profit (ahem, I mean, progress). The only way to overcome market forces towards ruthless, inhuman efficiency is for the people as a collective whole to intervene - i.e. a democratic government to "regulate" the industry. I really think people like Rand who believe governments and buereaucrats only get in the way are simply taking for granted all the good their existence does.

to:

*** And that's exactly what bothers me about the book, Rand, Objectivists and many libertarians in general. Deregulate, let the people build, get out of the way, get government out of the workplace and let the great men do what they want. We've lived in that world before: welcome to the 19th century Industrial Age, when the skies of London were black with smoke, when children worked in coal mines and workers who lost their limbs in industrial accidents were simply thrown out on onto the street as beggers for the crime of being useless now. There's no capitalist incentive to protect those workers at all, not when it cuts into profit (ahem, I mean, progress). The only way to overcome natural market forces towards ruthless, inhuman efficiency is for the people as a collective whole to intervene - i.e. a democratic government to "regulate" the industry. I really think people like Rand who believe governments and buereaucrats only get in the way are simply taking for granted all the good their existence does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** And that's exactly what bothers me about the book, Rand, Objectivists and many libertarians in general. Deregulate, let the people build, get out of the way, get government out of the workplace and let the great men do what they want. We've lived in that world before: welcome to the 19th century Industrial Age, when the skies of London were black with smoke, when children worked in coal mines and workers who lost their limbs in industrial accidents were simply thrown out on the street as beggers for the crime of being useless now. There's no capitalist incentive to protect those workers at all, not when it cuts into profit (ahem, I mean, progress). The only way to overcome market forces towards ruthless, inhuman efficiency is for the people as a collective whole to intervene - i.e. a democratic government to "regulate" the industry. I really think people like Rand who think governments and buereaucrats only get in the way are taking for granted all the good their existence does.

to:

*** And that's exactly what bothers me about the book, Rand, Objectivists and many libertarians in general. Deregulate, let the people build, get out of the way, get government out of the workplace and let the great men do what they want. We've lived in that world before: welcome to the 19th century Industrial Age, when the skies of London were black with smoke, when children worked in coal mines and workers who lost their limbs in industrial accidents were simply thrown out on the street as beggers for the crime of being useless now. There's no capitalist incentive to protect those workers at all, not when it cuts into profit (ahem, I mean, progress). The only way to overcome market forces towards ruthless, inhuman efficiency is for the people as a collective whole to intervene - i.e. a democratic government to "regulate" the industry. I really think people like Rand who think believe governments and buereaucrats only get in the way are simply taking for granted all the good their existence does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** And that's exactly what bothers me about the book, Rand, Objectivists and many libertarians in general. Deregulate, let the people build, get out of the way, get government out of the workplace and let the great men do what they want. We've lived in that world before: welcome to the 19th century Industrial Age, when the skies of London were black with smoke, when children worked in coal mines and workers who lost their limbs in industrial accidents were simply thrown out on the street as beggers for the crime of being useless now. There's no capitalist incentive to protect those workers at all, not when it cuts into profit (ahem, I mean, progress). The only way to overcome market forces towards ruthless, inhuman efficiency is for the people as a collective whole to intervene - i.e. a democratic government to "regulate" the industry. I really think people like Rand who think governments and buereaucrats only get in the way are taking for granted all the good their existence does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Galt Gulch. OK, let all this happen. And you want me to believe that the new structure of society is superior by giving me a great example? Oh, it works for organising people who love doing their work well. We are not shown how well it will deal with a moocher inside trying to game the system. Building an Utopia is so easy when everybody loves honest work and is honest. And just in case this all still makes sense, let's give many people golden deposits probably comparable to the entire value of the economy inside the Galt's Gulch - which do not seem to affect the economy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Sooo... The Strikers were just supposed to give in because the Looters' incompetence was killing people? At every turn, Dagny told them what they had to do to make things better - Deregulate. Let people rebuild. Stop squeezing the country's neck. You're killing people. Just freaking stop. The ending that happened was the only one that could happen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Response




to:

\n** Keep in mind Phillip had nothing he could offer, and he thought Rearden should give him a job just because he's family, which would make him just as much a parasite.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* How can a story that is meant to be realistic has the invention of a power source that the laws of thermodynamics says is physically imposable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Replacing one system that kills lots of people with another that kills most of the rest of them is not solving a problem. They caused far more deaths with their plan than collectivists ever would.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Harry Reardens brother releases that he's sick of recieving money from the goverment without working and asks for a job at Rearden Metal. Harry Rearden gives him a filibuster about how he is not motivated by obligations and guilt and does not have to give his brother a job, its his choise. He then chooses to ignore his family and not give him a job, dooming him to remain a parasite.

Changed: 157

Removed: 49

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The founder of Gult's Gulch was a banker who got sick of the government forcing him to make loans to people who had no prayer of repaying them. This injustice is eerily similar to the IRL "Community Reinvestment Act", which was the root cause of the 2008 financial collapse.
*** This zombie lie has been completely debunked.

to:

** The founder of Gult's Gulch was a banker who got sick of the government forcing him to make loans to people who had no prayer of repaying them. This injustice is eerily similar to the IRL "Community Reinvestment Act", which was one of the root cause causes of the 2008 financial collapse.
*** This zombie lie has been completely debunked.
crisis - the government lenders who bought bad debt from banks to encourage subprime lending to the disadvantaged.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They never wanted technology to sustain the world, they just wanted weapons to threaten other people into sustaining the world for them - and this is the last time they will ever get one. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the end result of ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem; they're using the last bullets on Earth to force last gunsmith on Earth to make bullets for them - and their gun just jammed. He told them how to unjam it, but not how to make more bullets. They can kill him if they want, and he'll even help them kill him, but he will not help them hurt anyone else. Once the last bullets are gone, they'll never find any more. No one will ever build a bullet for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''

* Why was electric torture the only way to hurt Gulch? Couldn't they have just used low-tech torture, like hitting him?
** Dr Ferris is a recognisable douche. I think he wanted to try out his new shiny thing.

to:

**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They never wanted technology to sustain the world, they just wanted weapons to threaten other people into sustaining the world for them - and this is the last time they will ever get one.he won't give them any. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the end result of ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem; they're using the last bullets on Earth to force last gunsmith on Earth to make bullets for them - and their gun just jammed. He told them how to unjam it, but not how to make more bullets. They can kill him if they want, and he'll even help them kill him, but he will not help them hurt anyone else. Once the last bullets are gone, they'll never find any more. No one will ever build a bullet for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''

* Why was electric torture the only way to hurt Gulch? Galt? Couldn't they have just used low-tech torture, like hitting him?
** Dr Ferris is a recognisable recognizable douche. I think he wanted to try out his new shiny thing.



* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and pretend the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
** News flash - the screwups were happening anyway! Nowadays, when the government regulates something to the point that it gets people killed, it's the fault of whoever's being regulated. No one cares that someone stupid demanded things that would screw up. The "strike" was simply them saying, "Okay, if you don't like it, I won't do it ''at all''." Blaming the strikers for the deaths and destruction is like blaming whoever's being terrorized when terrorists kill hostages. The bureaucrats were the ones who broke other people's things, and blamed the owners when the broken things killed people. The strikers just stopped taking the blame for other people's mistakes. "You stole my car and hit someone? ''It's not my car anymore!''"

to:

* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and pretend the massive ammount amount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
** News flash - the screwups were happening anyway! Nowadays, when the government regulates something to the point that it gets people killed, it's the fault of whoever's being regulated. No one cares that someone stupid demanded things that would screw up. The "strike" was simply them saying, "Okay, if you don't like it, I won't do it ''at all''." Blaming the strikers for the deaths and destruction is like blaming whoever's being terrorized when terrorists kill hostages. The bureaucrats were the ones who broke other people's things, and blamed the owners when the broken things killed people. The strikers just stopped taking the blame for other people's mistakes. "You stole my car and hit someone? ''It's not my car anymore!''"anymore!''" It's a tragedy, but it's not their fault - it's the fault of the people who ran the world into the ground. They just stopped fixing what the looters broke.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the end result of ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem - they're using the last gun on Earth to steal the last bullets on Earth from the last gunsmith on Earth. Even if they get the bullets, they'll never find any more. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''

to:

**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They never wanted technology to sustain the world, they just as a weapon wanted weapons to threaten other people into building technology sustaining the world for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it.one. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the end result of ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem - ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem; they're using the last gun bullets on Earth to steal force last gunsmith on Earth to make bullets for them - and their gun just jammed. He told them how to unjam it, but not how to make more bullets. They can kill him if they want, and he'll even help them kill him, but he will not help them hurt anyone else. Once the last bullets on Earth from the last gunsmith on Earth. Even if they get the bullets, are gone, they'll never find any more. No one will ever build a gun bullet for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the last gun they'll ever get. This is the end. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''

to:

**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and at the same time pointed out that ''that's all they ever really asked for''. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they '''never learned how to build a fucking gun'''. This is the end result of ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem - they're using the last gun on Earth to steal the last bullets on Earth from the last gunsmith on Earth. Even if they get the bullets, they'll ever get. This is the end.never find any more. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and '''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''

Changed: 208

Removed: 207

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The point of the electric torture machine was to inflict the maximum pain possible without actually killing the subject. It was monitoring his heart rate, and stopping every time it came close to killing him. I saw a show on the Discovery Channel or something like that about possible technologies and their advantages and disadvantages - there was one on robotic surgeons: surgical procedures become cheap -
positive. Negative - surgeons without ethics; stick a subject in a "doc box" and it will inflict the maximum amount of pain possible while keeping him alive the whole time - ''the ultimate torture machine!''

to:

*** The point of the electric torture machine was to inflict the maximum pain possible without actually killing the subject. It was monitoring his heart rate, and stopping every time it came close to killing him. I saw a show on the Discovery Channel or something like that about possible technologies and their advantages and disadvantages - there was one on robotic surgeons: surgical procedures become cheap -
- positive. Negative - surgeons without ethics; stick a subject in a "doc box" and it will inflict the maximum amount of pain possible while keeping him alive the whole time - ''the ultimate torture machine!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The point of the electric torture machine was to inflict the maximum pain possible without actually killing the subject. It was monitoring his heart rate, and stopping every time it came close to killing him. I saw a show on the Discovery Channel or something like that about possible technologies and their advantages and disadvantages - there was one on robotic surgeons: surgical procedures become cheap -
positive. Negative - surgeons without ethics; stick a subject in a "doc box" and it will inflict the maximum amount of pain possible while keeping him alive the whole time - ''the ultimate torture machine!''


Added DiffLines:

** News flash - the screwups were happening anyway! Nowadays, when the government regulates something to the point that it gets people killed, it's the fault of whoever's being regulated. No one cares that someone stupid demanded things that would screw up. The "strike" was simply them saying, "Okay, if you don't like it, I won't do it ''at all''." Blaming the strikers for the deaths and destruction is like blaming whoever's being terrorized when terrorists kill hostages. The bureaucrats were the ones who broke other people's things, and blamed the owners when the broken things killed people. The strikers just stopped taking the blame for other people's mistakes. "You stole my car and hit someone? ''It's not my car anymore!''"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and they realize that that's really all they asked for. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they ''never learned how to build a fucking gun''. This is the last gun they'll ever get. This is the end. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and Galt feels fine.

to:

**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and they realize at the same time pointed out that that's really ''that's all they ever really asked for.for''. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they ''never '''never learned how to build a fucking gun''.gun'''. This is the last gun they'll ever get. This is the end. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and Galt feels fine.
'''''[[HappilyEverAfter everything's going to be just fine.]]'''''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**** Talk about CompletelyMissingThePoint! The electric torture scene is the culmination of the "Sanction of the Victim" - that the evil men of the world had always been dependent on good men to keep them alive. They've strapped Galt down, zapped him over and over again, demanding he obey, zap zap zap, and then the damned thing breaks and none of them know how to fix it. He calmly points out how to fix it, and they realize that that's really all they asked for. They wanted technology just as a weapon to threaten other people into building technology for them - and this is the last time they will ever get it. "All political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" and the politicians had always simply stolen guns because they ''never learned how to build a fucking gun''. This is the last gun they'll ever get. This is the end. No one will ever build a gun for them ever again. It's TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt and Galt feels fine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed my origional post to make it less flamebaity.



to:

* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and pretend the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because they DidNotDoTheResearch.

to:

** Because they DidNotDoTheResearch.
DidNotDoTheResearch. Its just like with the thousands of people who have never read a page of the bible yet say they are devout Christians the book exists as more a decoration than reading material. that and while i don't have a huge problem with the message the book is poorly written in many ways and really should have just been in a form like the Communist Manifesto where it is just a doorstopper book about the economic philosophy. Yes I do get the irony in saying that an objectivist AuthorTract should be more like the Communist Manifesto.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Because they DidNotDoTheResearch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
rude entry that fails to add to the discussion.


* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and act like the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing. They then found an Egopolis that will likelly fall apart within a decade from lack of people who can do any of the jobs that soceity needs to function but they believe themselves above thus causing one of the worst societal collapses of all time because they were making love to their own egos.

to:

* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and act like the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing. They then found an Egopolis that will likelly fall apart within a decade from lack of people who can do any of the jobs that soceity needs to function but they believe themselves above thus causing one of the worst societal collapses of all time because they were making love to their own egos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and act like the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
----

to:

* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and act like the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
nothing. They then found an Egopolis that will likelly fall apart within a decade from lack of people who can do any of the jobs that soceity needs to function but they believe themselves above thus causing one of the worst societal collapses of all time because they were making love to their own egos.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* All of the protagonist's they act like self-entitled whiners and act like the massive ammount of people their plan would kill means nothing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This would most likely result in a second Dark Age that could last well past the rest of these peoples live should it happen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n** This point of the book reflects the height of arrogance of the author. Even if 1000 of the most critically important persons in the world were to vanish from society, others with 99% of their competence would happily take their place. The world would muddle on as before with no significant change. Those 1000 would be forgotten by most. "Remember John? Anyone know what he's up to now?"
*** Furthermore, those 1000 would be shocked at the heavy work they would have to do hidden in their own gulch, to replace numerous services they took for granted. The vast majority wouldn't last a month; they'd trickle out one by one leaving only a few diehards. Eventually the last of them (probably Galt himself) would give up, railing and raging against the wind in a 100-page rant at the failure of his gulch and of the world to collapse around him: "It's anti-life and anti-man!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Later on in the book, a coal-powered train travels into an unventilated tunnel, killing everyone aboard. Rand makes it clear that they were all TooDumbToLive. By this time, most of the readers (and Rand herself, no doubt) have forgotten the opening section and never realize that the two events are of the same type. Of course, the opening incident is committed by the good guys who are AlwaysRight, so no harm came.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This zombie lie has been completely debunked.

Changed: 1245

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Even if the collapse was caused by greedy CEOs (it wasn't, but let's say it was) the economic crisis is only tangentially related to why people are spray-painting "Who Is John Galt?" all over the place. President Barack Obama's ''handling'' of the crisis has a lot more to do with it. Despite some claims to the contrary, President Obama has done a poor job of handling the economy. According to the very same metric supplied by his administration, Obama's Stimulus plan was an abject failure. Some of you may remember [[http://otrans.3cdn.net/45593e8ecbd339d074_l3m6bt1te.pdf this chart (Figure 1, pg 4)]] created by Obama's economic team as a projection of what the Stimulus would accomplish. According to their findings, passing the Stimulus would've kept unemployment under 8% and stimulated a quick economic recovery. Without the Stimulus, unemployment would've topped 9% and recovered much more slowly. [[http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/stimulus-vs-unemployment-june2010-dots.gif Now here's what actually happened.]] Again, ''by the very same metric supplied by the Obama administration'', the Stimulus was a failure. Not only that, according to some economists it may have actually ''worsened'' the economic crisis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**"get the country back to its current size and strength."? But it's already near collapse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The founder of Gult's Gulch was a banker who got sick of the government forcing him to make loans to people who had no prayer of repaying them. This injustice is eerily similar to the IRL "Community Reinvestment Act", which was the root cause of the 2008 financial collapse.

Top