Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their sheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)? And what made them think Fievel was crazy and it wouldn't work?
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their sheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)? And what made them think Fievel was crazy and it wouldn't work?work?
** How high they were up was probably a discouragement, and Feivel's idea was crazy. Crazy enough to work.
** How high they were up was probably a discouragement, and Feivel's idea was crazy. Crazy enough to work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their sheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their sheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?beard)? And what made them think Fievel was crazy and it wouldn't work?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their bedsheets sheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their bedsheets together into a rope before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers tying their bedsheets together into a rope before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers never think of tying their bedsheets together into a rope before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers tying their bedsheets together into a rope before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard).
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers tying their bedsheets together into a rope before? Why did they need a little kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard).beard)?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers except Tony act like Fievel was crazy when he thought of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window? This could have been justified by them being little kids, and thus maybe unfamiliar with this trick, except at least one of them is an adult.
to:
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers except Tony act like Fievel was crazy when he thought of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window? This could have been justified by them being before? Why did they need a little kids, and thus maybe unfamiliar with this trick, except kid to tell them they could do that when at least one of them is clearly an adult.adult (the one with a deep voice and a beard).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* Why didn't Fievil follow the train tracks in the second film after going overboard?
to:
* Why didn't Fievil follow the train tracks in the second film after going overboard?overboard?
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers except Tony act like Fievel was crazy when he thought of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window? This could have been justified by them being little kids, and thus maybe unfamiliar with this trick, except at least one of them is an adult.
* In the first film, why did all the other sweatshop workers except Tony act like Fievel was crazy when he thought of tying their bedsheets together into a rope and going out the window? This could have been justified by them being little kids, and thus maybe unfamiliar with this trick, except at least one of them is an adult.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in Green River were good until after they got there, right?
to:
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in Green River were good until after they got there, right?right?
** The villain used a puppet to pitch the idea of cats and mice in Green River getting along. Admittedly the father's line there (now that I really think about it) comes later on in the film. But that doesn't quite explain why they weren't too bothered about uprooting for a promised land, again.
* Why didn't Fievil follow the train tracks in the second film after going overboard?
** The villain used a puppet to pitch the idea of cats and mice in Green River getting along. Admittedly the father's line there (now that I really think about it) comes later on in the film. But that doesn't quite explain why they weren't too bothered about uprooting for a promised land, again.
* Why didn't Fievil follow the train tracks in the second film after going overboard?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Warren could have been planning to use Fievel as some kind of bargaining chip, perhaps.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving it to the Fridge section
Deleted line(s) 4,9 (click to see context) :
* Unless we never see Fievel go through immigration at the end of the first movie, Fievel's technically an illegal immigrant!
** DEY TOOK OUR JEEEEEEEERBS!!
** In 1888? there was no such thing. If you got here, you were legal.
** They are animals and laws do not apply to them like that?
*** But we see the rest of his family become registered citizens at Castle Garden early on in the film, which makes the FridgeLogic more jarring. Although it probably didn't matter as much back then.
** Maybe the Statue of Liberty flight happened right after running Fievel through immigration. They were in the right area for it to happen, and we don't know how much time has passed since the family's reunion and Fievel and Tanya getting a close up view of the newly finished statue.
** DEY TOOK OUR JEEEEEEEERBS!!
** In 1888? there was no such thing. If you got here, you were legal.
** They are animals and laws do not apply to them like that?
*** But we see the rest of his family become registered citizens at Castle Garden early on in the film, which makes the FridgeLogic more jarring. Although it probably didn't matter as much back then.
** Maybe the Statue of Liberty flight happened right after running Fievel through immigration. They were in the right area for it to happen, and we don't know how much time has passed since the family's reunion and Fievel and Tanya getting a close up view of the newly finished statue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Maybe the Statue of Liberty flight happened right after running Fievel through immigration. They were in the right area for it to happen, and we don't know how much time has passed since the family's reunion and Fievel and Tanya getting a close up view of the newly finished statue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in GreenRiver were good until after they got there, right?
to:
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in GreenRiver Green River were good until after they got there, right?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* Something that's always annoyed me: Fievel's dad in the second film telling him to effectively forget about Tiger because 'He was still a cat.' despite acknowledging that he was good - But they're going to Green River where apparently cats are good, too. Why?
to:
* Something that's always annoyed me: Fievel's dad in the second film telling him to effectively forget about Tiger because 'He was still a cat.' despite acknowledging that he was good - But they're going to Green River where apparently cats are good, too. Why?Why?
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in GreenRiver were good until after they got there, right?
** They weren't under the impression that the cats in GreenRiver were good until after they got there, right?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* What is the point of the scene in the second movie where the human lady shoves the cat in her cleavage while shouting "pussy"? Like, is that supposed to be funny? It just seems so random and out of place, especially in a kids' movie.
to:
* What is the point of the scene in the second movie where the human lady shoves the cat in her cleavage while shouting "pussy"? Like, is that supposed to be funny? It just seems so random and out of place, especially in a kids' movie.movie.
*Something that's always annoyed me: Fievel's dad in the second film telling him to effectively forget about Tiger because 'He was still a cat.' despite acknowledging that he was good - But they're going to Green River where apparently cats are good, too. Why?
*Something that's always annoyed me: Fievel's dad in the second film telling him to effectively forget about Tiger because 'He was still a cat.' despite acknowledging that he was good - But they're going to Green River where apparently cats are good, too. Why?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* I get that humans can't understand the talking animals but do they not notice that they wear clothes?
to:
* I get that humans can't understand the talking animals but do they not notice that they wear clothes?clothes?
* What is the point of the scene in the second movie where the human lady shoves the cat in her cleavage while shouting "pussy"? Like, is that supposed to be funny? It just seems so random and out of place, especially in a kids' movie.
* What is the point of the scene in the second movie where the human lady shoves the cat in her cleavage while shouting "pussy"? Like, is that supposed to be funny? It just seems so random and out of place, especially in a kids' movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** OffscreenVillainy. We never see a mouse actually get eaten by a cat in the entire series, it's only implied that it happens (though Fievel gets ''almost'' eaten).
to:
** OffscreenVillainy. We never see a mouse actually get eaten by a cat in the entire series, it's only implied that it happens (though Fievel gets ''almost'' eaten).eaten).
*I get that humans can't understand the talking animals but do they not notice that they wear clothes?
*I get that humans can't understand the talking animals but do they not notice that they wear clothes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* When the cats capture Fivel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?
to:
* When the cats capture Fivel Fievel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
** Maybe they were planning on sending him back to the sweat shop.
to:
** Maybe they were planning on sending him back to the sweat shop.shop.
** OffscreenVillainy. We never see a mouse actually get eaten by a cat in the entire series, it's only implied that it happens (though Fievel gets ''almost'' eaten).
** OffscreenVillainy. We never see a mouse actually get eaten by a cat in the entire series, it's only implied that it happens (though Fievel gets ''almost'' eaten).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** But we see the rest of his family become registered citizens at Castle Garden early on in the film, which makes the FridgeLogic more jarring. Although it probably didn't matter as much back then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* When the cats capture Fivel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?
to:
* When the cats capture Fivel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?him?
** Maybe they were planning on sending him back to the sweat shop.
** Maybe they were planning on sending him back to the sweat shop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them ForWantOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.
to:
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them ForWantOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.near-misses.
* When the cats capture Fivel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?
* When the cats capture Fivel in the first film, why do they put him in a cage instead of just killing him?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** They are animals and laws do not apply to them like that?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them BecauseOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.
to:
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them BecauseOfANail, ForWantOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Watching this movie as a kid, it really bugged me when, every five minutes, Fievel and his family would be moments away from reuniting without realizing it. It's a real MindScrew for a seven year old child.
to:
* Watching this movie as a kid, it really bugged me when, every five minutes, Fievel and his family would be moments away from reuniting without realizing it. It's a real MindScrew for a seven year old child.child.
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them BecauseOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.
** As a young child, I saw it as [[YouCantFightFate unfortunate coincidences]] keeping them ''barely'' apart until Fievel fulfilled his destined prerogative or the movie was close enough to feature-length. RuleOfDrama (the poignancy of repeatedly missing them BecauseOfANail, and the TruthInTelevision of him missing them InSpiteOfANail) and seeing that his family was making their way okay, I think, justified the near-misses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** In 1888? there was no such thing. If you got here, you were legal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** Same way the human immigrants got ''their'' unfortunately false misconceptions about America.
to:
** Same way the human immigrants got ''their'' unfortunately false misconceptions about America.America.
* Watching this movie as a kid, it really bugged me when, every five minutes, Fievel and his family would be moments away from reuniting without realizing it. It's a real MindScrew for a seven year old child.
* Watching this movie as a kid, it really bugged me when, every five minutes, Fievel and his family would be moments away from reuniting without realizing it. It's a real MindScrew for a seven year old child.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Where did they get the idea that there were no cats in America in the first place?
to:
* Where did they get the idea that there were no cats in America in the first place?place?
** Same way the human immigrants got ''their'' unfortunately false misconceptions about America.
** Same way the human immigrants got ''their'' unfortunately false misconceptions about America.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** [[TooDumbToLive Same reason]] Cat R. Waul has no trouble tricking them ''again'' in quite a few episodes of ''Fievel's American Tails''.
to:
** [[TooDumbToLive Same reason]] Cat R. Waul has no trouble tricking them ''again'' in quite a few episodes of ''Fievel's American Tails''.Tails''.
* Where did they get the idea that there were no cats in America in the first place?
* Where did they get the idea that there were no cats in America in the first place?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** Maybe they all just never pay attention?
to:
** Maybe they all just never pay attention?attention?
** [[TooDumbToLive Same reason]] Cat R. Waul has no trouble tricking them ''again'' in quite a few episodes of ''Fievel's American Tails''.
** [[TooDumbToLive Same reason]] Cat R. Waul has no trouble tricking them ''again'' in quite a few episodes of ''Fievel's American Tails''.