Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* In ''The Man Who Smiled'', why did the murderer bother to stuff the stool he was sitting on in the ColdOpen into the boot of the car he was just about to crash and make the death of its driver look like an accident? Wouldn't he think it would look suspicious that the victim would have a (''broken'' - one chair leg was still outside in the dirt) stool in the boot? After all, it ended up being the only clue that led Wallander and his team to the actual cause of the crash. Also, why did he bring a stool with him to begin with? It seems the stool was just some kind of hastily written plot device to advance the plot.
to:
* In ''The Man Who Smiled'', why did the murderer bother to stuff the stool he was sitting on in the ColdOpen into the boot of the car he was just about to crash and make the death of its driver look like an accident? Wouldn't he think it would look suspicious that the victim would have a (''broken'' - one chair leg was still outside in the dirt) stool in the boot? After all, it ended up being the only clue that led Wallander and his team to the actual cause of the crash. Also, why did he bring a stool with him to begin with? It seems the stool was just some kind of hastily written plot clue device to advance the plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* In ''The Man Who Smiled'', why did the murderer bother to stuff the stool he was sitting on in the ColdOpen into the boot of the car he was just about to crash and make the death of its driver look like an accident? After all, it ended up being the only clue that led Wallander and his team to the actual cause of the crash. Also, why did he bring a stool with him to begin with? It seems the stool was just some kind of hastily written plot device to advance the plot.
to:
* In ''The Man Who Smiled'', why did the murderer bother to stuff the stool he was sitting on in the ColdOpen into the boot of the car he was just about to crash and make the death of its driver look like an accident? Wouldn't he think it would look suspicious that the victim would have a (''broken'' - one chair leg was still outside in the dirt) stool in the boot? After all, it ended up being the only clue that led Wallander and his team to the actual cause of the crash. Also, why did he bring a stool with him to begin with? It seems the stool was just some kind of hastily written plot device to advance the plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* In ''The Man Who Smiled'', why did the murderer bother to stuff the stool he was sitting on in the ColdOpen into the boot of the car he was just about to crash and make the death of its driver look like an accident? After all, it ended up being the only clue that led Wallander and his team to the actual cause of the crash. Also, why did he bring a stool with him to begin with? It seems the stool was just some kind of hastily written plot device to advance the plot.
