Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
Changed line(s) 8,11 (click to see context) from:
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
to:
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.anyway...
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** According to the footage, you and I are probably ''less'' intelligent than intelligent Calcium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
to:
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...anyway...
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
!! FridgeBrilliance
* "What ''are'' birds? We just don't know." The ''Birds of Britain'' extra reveals that in the LAY verse, birds have only been around since 1962. Since the show is set in the 70s, it makes sense that they don't know much about a recently arrived species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
to:
** Just to confuse things further, series 2 contains a reference to Mozhoven.
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[SurrealHumour You've obviously missed the point of the show.]]
Added DiffLines:
** See above.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* There's a shot in Series 1 Music with the narrator saying "You might not be the next Mozart" with a bust. The bust is of Beethoven.
to:
* There's a shot in Series 1 Music with the narrator saying "You might not be the next Mozart" with a bust. The bust is of Beethoven.Beethoven.
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
* The winner of the "futuristic song" competition is the one that best flatters the early-80s idea of futuristic music, but it's also the one that most closely resembles real popular music in the year 2000. Not sure what this proves, but anyway...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium is able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How is this different from human intelligence?
to:
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium It is also able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How exactly is this different from human intelligence?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium is able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How is this different from human intelligence?
to:
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium is able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How is this different from human intelligence?intelligence?
* There's a shot in Series 1 Music with the narrator saying "You might not be the next Mozart" with a bust. The bust is of Beethoven.
* There's a shot in Series 1 Music with the narrator saying "You might not be the next Mozart" with a bust. The bust is of Beethoven.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
!!FridgeLogic
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium is able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How is this different from human intelligence?
* "Intelligent calcium is not intelligent in the sense that you or I are intelligent, but intelligent in that it is sentient. I.e. it is aware of itself and its surroundings." In addition to that, we are shown that intelligent calcium is able to communicate this awareness in human terms. How is this different from human intelligence?
