Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* When I was a kid, I had a 1922 World Book encyclopedia that told the ''original'' legend of King Lear - in which Lear, incensed by his children's behavior, crosses the channel to France, returns with his army, reconquers his kingdom, and rules it 'til his death. So that left me the puzzle of why Shakespeare changed it around to make the king's ending so pathetic? At first I thought it was just for greater drama. But years later after I'd read ''Henry VI, Part I'' and some of the other plays, my father asked me why Cordelia loses. And then it finally hit me. Cordelia's army is ''French.'' In Shakespeare, it doesn't matter what the history or the legend says, and it doesn't matter if it's set thousands of years ago when they were all Celts...French armies simply do not beat English ones in a straight fight. Ever. If they have some temporary little success, like that Joan of Arc business, it's either because they're using witchcraft or because the English are divided against themselves. - Alberich
to:
* When I was a kid, I had a 1922 World Book encyclopedia that told the ''original'' legend of King Lear - in which Lear, incensed by his children's behavior, crosses the channel to France, returns with his army, reconquers his kingdom, and rules it 'til his death. So that left me the puzzle of why Shakespeare changed it around to make the king's ending so pathetic? At first I thought it was just for greater drama. But years later after I'd read ''Henry VI, Part I'' and some of the other plays, my father asked me why Cordelia loses. And then it finally hit me. Cordelia's army is ''French.'' In Shakespeare, it doesn't matter what the history or the legend says, and it doesn't matter if it's set thousands of years ago when they were all Celts... French armies simply do not beat English ones in a straight fight. Ever. If they have some temporary little success, like that Joan of Arc business, it's either because they're using witchcraft or because the English are divided against themselves. - Alberich
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival? -Khurzog
to:
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH ''French'' army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival? -Khurzog[[RootingForTheEmpire Rooting For]] TheRival? - Khurzog
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
----
[[AC:FridgeBrilliance]]
[[AC:FridgeBrilliance]]
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival?
-Khurzog
-Khurzog
to:
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival?
RootingForTheRival? -Khurzog
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rooting For The Rival entry
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* When I was a kid, I had a 1922 World Book encyclopedia that told the ''original'' legend of King Lear - in which Lear, incensed by his children's behavior, crosses the channel to France, returns with his army, reconquers his kingdom, and rules it 'til his death. So that left me the puzzle of why Shakespeare changed it around to make the king's ending so pathetic? At first I thought it was just for greater drama. But years later after I'd read ''Henry VI, Part I'' and some of the other plays, my father asked me why Cordelia loses. And then it finally hit me. Cordelia's army is ''French.'' In Shakespeare, it doesn't matter what the history or the legend says, and it doesn't matter if it's set thousands of years ago when they were all Celts...French armies simply do not beat English ones in a straight fight. Ever. If they have some temporary little success, like that Joan of Arc business, it's either because they're using witchcraft or because the English are divided against themselves. - Alberich
to:
* When I was a kid, I had a 1922 World Book encyclopedia that told the ''original'' legend of King Lear - in which Lear, incensed by his children's behavior, crosses the channel to France, returns with his army, reconquers his kingdom, and rules it 'til his death. So that left me the puzzle of why Shakespeare changed it around to make the king's ending so pathetic? At first I thought it was just for greater drama. But years later after I'd read ''Henry VI, Part I'' and some of the other plays, my father asked me why Cordelia loses. And then it finally hit me. Cordelia's army is ''French.'' In Shakespeare, it doesn't matter what the history or the legend says, and it doesn't matter if it's set thousands of years ago when they were all Celts...French armies simply do not beat English ones in a straight fight. Ever. If they have some temporary little success, like that Joan of Arc business, it's either because they're using witchcraft or because the English are divided against themselves. - AlberichAlberich
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival?
-Khurzog
* High school English class gave me the epiphany that Shakespeare brilliantly had the English audiences rooting for the FRENCH army when it intervened in the play. Imagine rooting for a certain sports team your whole life, and also subsequently rooting against another team. What sort of circumstances would have to occur to have you RootingForTheRival?
-Khurzog
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*When I was a kid, I had a 1922 World Book encyclopedia that told the ''original'' legend of King Lear - in which Lear, incensed by his children's behavior, crosses the channel to France, returns with his army, reconquers his kingdom, and rules it 'til his death. So that left me the puzzle of why Shakespeare changed it around to make the king's ending so pathetic? At first I thought it was just for greater drama. But years later after I'd read ''Henry VI, Part I'' and some of the other plays, my father asked me why Cordelia loses. And then it finally hit me. Cordelia's army is ''French.'' In Shakespeare, it doesn't matter what the history or the legend says, and it doesn't matter if it's set thousands of years ago when they were all Celts...French armies simply do not beat English ones in a straight fight. Ever. If they have some temporary little success, like that Joan of Arc business, it's either because they're using witchcraft or because the English are divided against themselves. - Alberich
