Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / CrimsonTide

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He punches Hunter in the face twice and threatens to outright murder another sailor in order to force Weps to launch the missiles. Ramsey was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He punches Hunter in the face twice and threatens to outright murder another sailor in order to force Weps to launch the missiles. Ramsey was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. While Hunter might've been partially wrong, Ramsey was wrong on all counts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He ends up threatening to outright murder, and punches Hunter in the face twice; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He ends up threatening to outright murder, and punches Hunter in the face twice; he twice and threatens to outright murder another sailor in order to force Weps to launch the missiles. Ramsey was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, a MartialPacifist, willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or murder, and punching punches Hunter in the face; face twice; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled.sprinkled in. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey, he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey, Ramsey: he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always the one to escalate situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey, he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand to either threats of physical violence or straight up physical violence by punching Hunter in the face; he's SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in, and always is the one to escalate situations.

to:

* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey, he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand to either threats of physical violence or straight up physical violence by punching Hunter in the face; he's is a rough and darker military man, being SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in, sprinkled. He ends up threatening to outright murder a sailor or and punching Hunter in the face; he was always is the one to escalate situations. situations, and was in the wrong to order Hunter's removal when Hunter refused to relay his order for a nuclear strike. Ramsey was wrong on all counts.

Added: 743

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ALighterShadeOfGrey: Played straight with Ramsey and Hunter. Despite the some efforts of the film to tell the viewer that both Ramsey and Hunter are equally right and wrong in a GoodVersusGood situation, the fact of the matter is that Hunter is portrayed in a more heroic light than Ramsey, he keeps his cool in nearly all situations, is Harvard educated, is a MartialPacifist, is willing to technically disobey orders for the greater good, and ends up being right. It also helps that he's TheProtagonist. Ramsey on the other hand to either threats of physical violence or straight up physical violence by punching Hunter in the face; he's SergeantRock with bits of TheNeidermeyer sprinkled in, and always is the one to escalate situations.



* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the older and more experienced officer having seen actual combat, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite his poor background, Ramsay listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, having never been in a combat situation, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.

to:

* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, Ramsey, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay Ramsey is the older and more experienced officer having seen actual combat, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite his poor background, Ramsay Ramsey listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, having never been in a combat situation, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the older and more experienced officer, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite his poor background, Ramsay listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.

to:

* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the older and more experienced officer, officer having seen actual combat, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite his poor background, Ramsay listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, having never been in a combat situation, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CulturedWarrior: Hunter went to Harvard, and likes to ride horses.

to:

* CulturedWarrior: Hunter went to Harvard, and likes to ride horses. Ramsay listens to classical music in his cabin and is the one to initiate philosophical debates on the nature of war.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the older and more experienced officer, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite the appearance and his poor background, Ramsay listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.

to:

* {{Foil}}: Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways the two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the older and more experienced officer, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite the appearance and his poor background, Ramsay listens to classical music and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is younger and more inexperienced, yet comes from a more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Foil}}: As much as the movie plays up the differences between them, in many ways Hunter is a younger Ramsey. Like the Captain, Commander Hunter has no qualms sacrificing the lives of three crewmen if it means saving the ship. As "cultured" as Hunter is, if you pay attention, you'll notice that in his state room, Captain Ramsey always has some sort of classical or opera music playing. Additionally, each man is capable of rallying various crew to their cause with little more than a word.

to:

* {{Foil}}: As much as the movie plays up the differences between them, in Hunter vs Ramsay, of course. In many ways Hunter is a younger Ramsey. Like the Captain, Commander Hunter has no qualms sacrificing two men are mirror images of one another. Ramsay is the lives of three crewmen if it means saving older and more experienced officer, yet comes from a poorer, less educated background than Hunter. He is the ship. As "cultured" as Hunter is, if you pay attention, you'll notice that hardass and firmly believes in GoodIsNotSoft and is firmly in the BloodKnight category. The way he motivates the crew is through the "man up" approach, with shades of fear and intimidation. Despite the appearance and his state room, Captain Ramsey always has some sort of poor background, Ramsay listens to classical or opera music playing. Additionally, each man and enjoys intellectual debates. Hunter on the other hand is capable of rallying various crew to their cause with little younger and more than inexperienced, yet comes from a word.more educated and esteemed background, coming from Harvard. Hunters' preference is a much more positive, softer and inspirational approach to the men, and leans towards being a MartialPacifist. Yet in his spare time, he's shown doing violent, physical activities, like boxing and exercising.

Added: 205

Removed: 117

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheProtagonist: Most of the movie is from Hunter's point of view, with several characters being the Deuteragonist.


Added DiffLines:

* TheProtagonist: Most of the movie is from Hunter's point of view and Denzel get's the most screentime, with the movie opening up with a birthday party at his house. Several characters are Deuteragonists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheProtagonist: Most of the movie is from Hunter's point of view, with several characters being the Deuteragonist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders (Ramsey is in violation of at least three articles such as UCMJ Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, UCMJ Article 128: Assault and UCMJ Article 80: Attempted Murder) than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).

to:

** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders (Ramsey is in violation of at least three articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice such as UCMJ Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, UCMJ Article 128: Assault and UCMJ Article 80: Attempted Murder) than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders (Ramsey is in violation of at least three article such as UCMJ Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, UCMJ Article 128: Assault and UCMJ Article 80: Attempted Murder) than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).

to:

** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders (Ramsey is in violation of at least three article articles such as UCMJ Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, UCMJ Article 128: Assault and UCMJ Article 80: Attempted Murder) than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).

to:

** As much of the film tries to present the situation as BothSidesHaveAPoint (including the final court martial), the reality is that Ramsey committed greater atrocities for the sake of performing his assumed orders (Ramsey is in violation of at least three article such as UCMJ Article 133: Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, UCMJ Article 128: Assault and UCMJ Article 80: Attempted Murder) than Hunter does trying to prevent them (Hunter certainly didn't threaten to kill anybody).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----

to:

--------

->''"As of January 1996, primary authority and ability to fire nuclear missiles will no longer rest with U.S. submarine commanders...\\
Principal control will reside with the President of the United States."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Crimson Tide'' is a war film about the United States Navy's nuclear submarine USS ''Alabama'' (SSBN-731), which gets sent to the Russian Far East to deter the leader of a Russian civil war, a violent nationalist who may or may not have nuclear weapons to use against the United States.

to:

''Crimson Tide'' is a war film about the United States Navy's nuclear submarine USS ''Alabama'' (SSBN-731), which gets sent to the Russian Far East to deter the leader of a Russian civil war, a violent nationalist who may or may not have ultranationalist who's threatening to use nuclear weapons to use against the United States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

No relation to ''Literature/TheCrimsonTide'', a gamebook.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KarmaHoudini: Dougherty, Zimmer and Westergard launch a mutiny (counter-mutiny?) against Hunter (and come across as jerks a bit in the process) that nearly launches the war after all, but are never shown to have been reprimanded in the aftermath due to the brass's decision that it was a GoodVersusGood conflict.

to:

* KarmaHoudini: Dougherty, Zimmer and Westergard launch a mutiny (counter-mutiny?) against Hunter (and come across as colossal jerks a bit in the process) that nearly launches the war after all, but are never shown to have been reprimanded in the aftermath due to the brass's decision that it was a GoodVersusGood conflict.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* IrrevocableOrder: Deconstructed as the basis for the internal conflict of the crew. When the new message is interrupted by the enemy sub, Ramsey chooses to continue with their existing order to launch, having no orders to the contrary in hand, and on the basis that the other subs with redundant orders may have been destroyed.]] Hunter wants to try to repair the radio, arguing that the new message could be an order to change targets, or cancel the launch entirely. Ramsey and Hunter both argue the merits of their positions to the officers and crew forming their respective factions. Hunter even explicitly points out that if they fire, and they're wrong, they will have caused WorldWarIII when Russia retaliates. Ultimately subverted when they repair the radio and confirm that the new message IS, in fact, an order to cancel their launch, as the rebel missile site had been recaptured by the Russian government.

to:

* IrrevocableOrder: Deconstructed as the basis for the internal conflict of the crew. When the new message is interrupted by the enemy sub, Ramsey chooses to continue with their existing order to launch, having no orders to the contrary in hand, and on the basis that the other subs with redundant orders may have been destroyed.]] Hunter wants to try to repair the radio, arguing that the new message could be an order to change targets, or cancel the launch entirely. Ramsey and Hunter both argue the merits of their positions to the officers and crew forming their respective factions. Hunter even explicitly points out that if they fire, and they're wrong, they will have caused WorldWarIII when Russia retaliates. Ultimately subverted when they repair the radio and confirm that the new message IS, in fact, an order to cancel their launch, as the rebel missile site had been recaptured by the Russian government.

Added: 494

Removed: 494

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Foil}}: As much as the movie plays up the differences between them, in many ways Hunter is a younger Ramsey. Like the Captain, Commander Hunter has no qualms sacrificing the lives of three crewmen if it means saving the ship. As "cultured" as Hunter is, if you pay attention, you'll notice that in his state room, Captain Ramsey always has some sort of classical or opera music playing. Additionally, each man is capable of rallying various crew to their cause with little more than a word.



* {{Foil}}: As much as the movie plays up the differences between them, in many ways Hunter is a younger Ramsey. Like the Captain, Commander Hunter has no qualms sacrificing the lives of three crewmen if it means saving the ship. As "cultured" as Hunter is, if you pay attention, you'll notice that in his state room, Captain Ramsey always has some sort of classical or opera music playing. Additionally, each man is capable of rallying various crew to their cause with little more than a word.

Added: 866

Changed: 725

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CantKillYouStillNeedYou: Captain Ramsay threatens Weps with a gun to get the launch trigger. Weps is the only person on the ship that knows the combination to the safe with the launch trigger in it, and refuses to open it. The captain counts to three, but curses when he realizes that if he kills Weps, ''no one'' will be able to open the safe. [[IWillPunishYourFriendForYourFailure So he points his gun at another sailor's head]], [[JumpingOffTheSlipperySlope and states that the sailor will die on the count of three]]. Weps is clearly horrified and relents, opening the safe. [[spoiler: Fortunately, the delay caused is enough that Hunter is able to remove the launch key in the CIC, disabling the launch system.]]

to:

* BotheringByTheBook: Master Chief Walters refuses Captain Ramsay's order to arrest Hunter and replace him with another officer, a gross abuse of power and against regulations.
-->Get it straight, Mr. Hunter. I'm not on your side. Now you could be wrong, but wrong or right, the captain can't just replace you at will. That was completely improper, and that's why I did what I did, by the book.
* CantKillYouStillNeedYou: Captain Ramsay threatens Weps with a gun to get the launch trigger. Weps is the only person on the ship that knows the combination to the safe with the launch trigger in it, and refuses to open it. The captain counts to three, but curses when he realizes that if he kills Weps, ''no one'' will be able to open the safe. [[IWillPunishYourFriendForYourFailure So he points his gun at another sailor's head]], [[JumpingOffTheSlipperySlope head, and states that the sailor will die on the count of three]].three. Weps is clearly horrified and relents, opening the safe. [[spoiler: Fortunately, the delay caused is enough that Hunter is able to remove the launch key in the CIC, disabling the launch system.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* IrrevocableOrder: [[DeconstructedTrope Deconstructed]] as the basis for the internal conflict of the crew. When the new message is interrupted by the enemy sub, Ramsey chooses to continue with their existing order to launch, [[JustifiedTrope having no orders to the contrary in hand, and on the basis that the other subs with redundant orders may have been destroyed.]] Hunter wants to try to repair the radio, [[DefiedTrope arguing that the new message could be an order to change targets, or cancel the launch entirely.]] Ramsey and Hunter both [[DiscussedTrope argue the merits of their positions to the officers and crew forming their respective factions.]] Hunter even explicitly points out that if they fire, and they're wrong, they will have caused WorldWarIII when Russia retaliates. Ultimately [[SubvertedTrope subverted]] when they repair the radio and confirm that the new message IS, in fact, an order to cancel their launch, as the rebel missile site had been recaptured by the Russian government.

to:

* IrrevocableOrder: [[DeconstructedTrope Deconstructed]] Deconstructed as the basis for the internal conflict of the crew. When the new message is interrupted by the enemy sub, Ramsey chooses to continue with their existing order to launch, [[JustifiedTrope having no orders to the contrary in hand, and on the basis that the other subs with redundant orders may have been destroyed.]] Hunter wants to try to repair the radio, [[DefiedTrope arguing that the new message could be an order to change targets, or cancel the launch entirely.]] entirely. Ramsey and Hunter both [[DiscussedTrope argue the merits of their positions to the officers and crew forming their respective factions.]] factions. Hunter even explicitly points out that if they fire, and they're wrong, they will have caused WorldWarIII when Russia retaliates. Ultimately [[SubvertedTrope subverted]] subverted when they repair the radio and confirm that the new message IS, in fact, an order to cancel their launch, as the rebel missile site had been recaptured by the Russian government.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Alabama'' is repeatedly referred to as a "ship". US Navy nomenclature for submarines is "boat".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not an example.


* AmericaSavesTheDay: [[SettingUpdate After a fashion]]. The plot is loosely based on/inspired by events aboard the Soviet submarine B-59 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, with Ramsey playing the part of Captain Valentin Savitsky, and Hunter playing the second-in-command Vasily Arkhipov. In this case, saving the day means [[MindScrew not]] firing a nuke and triggering a nuclear war. To the film's merit, the script justifies the Americans' involvement, and in the end it's the Russian government's own troops who take back the rebel base.

to:

* AmericaSavesTheDay: [[SettingUpdate After a fashion]]. The plot is loosely based on/inspired by events aboard the Soviet submarine B-59 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, with Ramsey playing the part of Captain Valentin Savitsky, and Hunter playing the second-in-command Vasily Arkhipov. In this case, saving the day means [[MindScrew not]] not firing a nuke and triggering a nuclear war. To the film's merit, the script justifies the Americans' involvement, and in the end it's the Russian government's own troops who take back the rebel base.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per TRS Rename


* AsYouKnow: During the attacks by the ''Akula'' submarine, one crew member repeatedly asks about basic concepts like the ArbitraryMinimumRange of the torpedoes (why Hunter maneuvers the ''Alabama'' to a thousand yards from the enemy before firing). In fairness, this is {{lampshaded}} when Rivetti becomes aghast at the other sailor's ignorance.

to:

* AsYouKnow: During the attacks by the ''Akula'' submarine, one crew member repeatedly asks about basic concepts like the ArbitraryMinimumRange ArbitraryWeaponRange of the torpedoes (why Hunter maneuvers the ''Alabama'' to a thousand yards from the enemy before firing). In fairness, this is {{lampshaded}} when Rivetti becomes aghast at the other sailor's ignorance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmericaSavesTheDay: [[SettingUpdate After a fashion]]. The plot is loosely based on/inspired by events aboard the Soviet submarine B-59 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, with Ramsey playing the part of Captain Valentin Savitsky, and Hunter playing the second-in-comand Vasily Arkhipov. In this case, saving the day means [[MindScrew not]] firing a nuke and triggering a nuclear war. To the film's merit, the script justifies the Americans' involvement, and in the end it's the Russian government's own troops who take back the rebel base.

to:

* AmericaSavesTheDay: [[SettingUpdate After a fashion]]. The plot is loosely based on/inspired by events aboard the Soviet submarine B-59 during the Cuban Missile Crisis, with Ramsey playing the part of Captain Valentin Savitsky, and Hunter playing the second-in-comand second-in-command Vasily Arkhipov. In this case, saving the day means [[MindScrew not]] firing a nuke and triggering a nuclear war. To the film's merit, the script justifies the Americans' involvement, and in the end it's the Russian government's own troops who take back the rebel base.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeelFaceRevolvingDoor: Weps jumps from Hunter’s side to Ramsey’s and back again.

to:

* HeelFaceRevolvingDoor: Weps jumps from Hunter’s side to Ramsey’s and back again. Ramsey is his Captain, but Hunter is a longtime friend, so he is the most torn between the two men of anyone on the Alabama.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ChromosomeCasting: Besides Hunter's wife appearing very briefly at the beginning of the film, the rest of the cast are all men.

to:

* ChromosomeCasting: Besides Hunter's wife appearing very briefly at the beginning of the film, film and some women at the end in Pearl Harbor, the rest of the cast are all men.men. Justified it that at the time women didn't serve aboard submarines.

Top