Follow TV Tropes

Following

History EarlyInstallmentWeirdness / AnimatedFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles1'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised. It also wasn't until six years later Pixar got certain textures (hair and fabric) right starting with ''WesternAnimation/MonstersInc''.

to:

** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles1'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised. It also wasn't until six years later Pixar got certain textures (hair and fabric) right starting with ''WesternAnimation/MonstersInc''.''WesternAnimation/MonstersInc1''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** The first ''Toy Story'' film is noticeably a lot darker and more adult in tone compared to its three sequels, relying far more on frightening imagery, dark humour and character conflict; Woody in particular is noticeably quite arrogant and aggressive in the original film, and at times, physically violent. Even small things, such as sound effects, are a lot harsher than its sequels, and the film contains some pretty grotesque and unnerving visuals (in the United Kingdom, it's the only Toy Story film to receive a "Parental Guidance" certificate). The third film does bring back some of this darkness, however.

to:

** The first ''Toy Story'' film is noticeably a lot darker and more adult in tone compared to its three sequels, relying far more on frightening imagery, dark humour BlackComedy and character conflict; Woody in particular is noticeably quite arrogant and aggressive in the original film, and at times, physically violent. Even small things, such as sound effects, are a lot harsher than its sequels, and the film contains some pretty grotesque and unnerving visuals (in the United Kingdom, it's the only Toy Story film to receive a "Parental Guidance" certificate). The third film does bring back some of this darkness, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Plot-wise, conditions for toys coming to life and staying put in the presence of humans seems somewhat more lax in the first movie compared to later films. Notably, the second film has Woody allowing himself to be stolen in order to prevent the discovery of toys being alive (and later, Jessie reverting to being motionless even as she's being loaded into a plane bound for Japan), while the third film has the toys subjecting themselves to being abused by toddlers and remaining as toys no matter what happens. As such, the original movie's iconic moment where Woody and the mutant toys publicly come to life to scare Sid seems to contradict rules in the sequels.

to:

** Plot-wise, conditions for toys coming to life and staying put in the presence of humans seems somewhat more lax in the first movie compared to later films. Notably, the second film has Woody allowing himself to be stolen in order to prevent the discovery of toys being alive (and later, Jessie reverting to being motionless even as she's being loaded into a plane bound for Japan), while the third film has the toys subjecting themselves to being abused by toddlers and remaining as toys no matter what happens. As such, the original movie's iconic moment where Woody and the mutant toys publicly come to life to scare Sid seems to contradict rules in the sequels. Justified, however, as Woody did say "I know we're gonna break a few rules," in the first film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


** Plot-wise, conditions for toys coming to life and staying put in the presence of humans seems somewhat more lax in the first movie compared to later films. Notably, the second film has Woody allowing himself to be stolen in order to prevent the discovery of toys being alive (and later, Jessie reverting to being motionless even as she's being loaded into a plane bound for Japan), while the third have the toys subjecting themselves to being abused by toddlers and remaining as toys no matter what happens. As such, the original movie's iconic moment where Woody and the mutant toys publicly comes to life and to scare Sid seems to contradict rules in the sequels.

to:

** Plot-wise, conditions for toys coming to life and staying put in the presence of humans seems somewhat more lax in the first movie compared to later films. Notably, the second film has Woody allowing himself to be stolen in order to prevent the discovery of toys being alive (and later, Jessie reverting to being motionless even as she's being loaded into a plane bound for Japan), while the third have film has the toys subjecting themselves to being abused by toddlers and remaining as toys no matter what happens. As such, the original movie's iconic moment where Woody and the mutant toys publicly comes come to life and to scare Sid seems to contradict rules in the sequels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Toy Story'' doesn't have Pixar's VanityPlate shown before the film (although it does appear after the credits). Instead, the Walt Disney Pictures logo, rather than fading to black, actually transitions into the movie proper, by having the camera pan away from the castle until it fades into the wallpaper of Andy's room. Retconned with the 3D re-release in 2009, as it opened with the current Disney logo ''and'' the Pixar logo.

to:

** ''Toy Story'' doesn't have Pixar's VanityPlate shown before the film (although it does appear after the credits). Instead, the Walt Disney Pictures logo, rather than fading to black, actually transitions into the movie proper, by having the camera pan {{pan}} away from the castle until it fades into the wallpaper of Andy's room. Retconned with the 3D re-release in 2009, as it opened with the current Disney logo ''and'' the Pixar logo.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
this is more of a YMMV especially when there is a concrete plot of the zoosters returning to their zoo


** The first film had a dramatic moment near the end, but overall focused much more heavily on fast-paced humor and pop culture references than the (somewhat) more emotional later films. Also, [[ArtifactTitle it takes place in Madagascar]].
** The characters' movements were much stiffer and bouncy than the latter films which have more fluid and smoother movements. It was also slower paced and felt like a bunch of related shorts put together instead of a consistent plot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles1'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised.

to:

** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles1'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised. It also wasn't until six years later Pixar got certain textures (hair and fabric) right starting with ''WesternAnimation/MonstersInc''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The first film heavily implied that Manny had recently lost his wife and child to human hunters, thus explaining his very dour attitude and reluctance to be in a group. This is never mentioned again, even once Manny [[spoiler: has a child with Ellie in the 3rd film. He's portrayed as utterly new to the concept of having a family.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised.

to:

** While the composition of the elements is still impressive, watching the original ''Toy Story'' over 20 years later it's noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles'' ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles1'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people, and then highly stylised.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'': The first film had more adult humour and was much more satire-based (with Lord Farquaad looking like then-Creator/{{Disney}} CEO Micheal Eisner). Also, since they weren't created at the time, it was the only instalment where neither Puss in Boots nor Far Far Away appear.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'': ''WesternAnimation/Shrek1'': The first film had more adult humour and was much more satire-based (with Lord Farquaad looking like then-Creator/{{Disney}} CEO Micheal Eisner). Also, since they weren't created at the time, it was the only instalment installment where neither Puss in Boots nor Far Far Away appear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/DespicableMe'': The soundtrack features a song called [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT43Aafi92I Minion Mambo]] that's credited as being sung by The Minions. However, instead of Pierre Coffin doing the voice of the Minions, they're voiced by Music/LupeFiasco (with his voice being sped-up) and they're speaking English instead of Minionese. The song also has a verse that says "we don't die, we multiply", something that has been disproven in later entries.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/DespicableMe'': ''WesternAnimation/DespicableMe1'': The soundtrack features a song called [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT43Aafi92I Minion Mambo]] that's credited as being sung by The Minions. However, instead of Pierre Coffin doing the voice of the Minions, they're voiced by Music/LupeFiasco (with his voice being sped-up) and they're speaking English instead of Minionese. The song also has a verse that says "we don't die, we multiply", something that has been disproven in later entries.



** Amongst their first films, ''WesternAnimation/ThePrinceOfEgypt'', ''WesternAnimation/TheRoadToElDorado'', ''WesternAnimation/SpiritStallionOfTheCimarron'' and ''WesternAnimation/SinbadLegendOfTheSevenSeas'' were traditionally animated instead of the now-omnipresent CGI. Also, ''Prince'' and ''Spirit'' were serious dramas, and ''Road'' and ''Sinbad'' were adventure films that contained many comedic elements, both in stark comparison to the zaniness the studio developed by ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'' (even if later franchises like ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' and ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'' showed that they could still be a little more serious when called for).

to:

** Amongst their first films, ''WesternAnimation/ThePrinceOfEgypt'', ''WesternAnimation/TheRoadToElDorado'', ''WesternAnimation/SpiritStallionOfTheCimarron'' and ''WesternAnimation/SinbadLegendOfTheSevenSeas'' were traditionally animated instead of the now-omnipresent CGI. Also, ''Prince'' and ''Spirit'' were serious dramas, and ''Road'' and ''Sinbad'' were adventure films that contained many comedic elements, both in stark comparison to the zaniness the studio developed by ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'' ''Franchise/{{Shrek}}'' (even if later franchises like ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' ''Franchise/KungFuPanda'' and ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'' ''Franchise/HowToTrainYourDragon'' showed that they could still be a little more serious when called for).



* ''WesternAnimation/{{Madagascar}}'':

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/{{Madagascar}}'':''WesternAnimation/Madagascar1'':

Top