Follow TV Tropes

Reviews ComicBook / Injustice Gods Among Us

Go To

Elmo3000 Since: Jul, 2013
04/03/2023 14:04:24 •••

Frustrating Wasted Potential

One day, the Joker is feeling bored, so he breaks out of Arkham Asylum again and decides to head to Metropolis and kill several million people, including Superman's pregnant wife. Superman very understandably concludes that putting the insane and irredeemable criminal who just murdered millions of people back into the same institution that he has effortlessly broken out of several dozen times before, is maybe not a very effective strategy, and kills him instead. This upsets Batman, as Superman has basically just permanently removed 70% of his regular workload without asking, overstepping his boundaries as a coworker, and Batman reacts by neglecting to comfort his best friend, whose pregnant wife was just murdered, and instead immediately sets about planning on the most efficient way to beat the shit out of him.

Because Batman is never allowed to be wrong about anything, Superman immediately jumps off of the most slippery slope imaginable and quickly turns the Justice League into George Orwell's 1985. Batman writes him off as a lost cause, along with his own son, Damian, who kills someone by a freak accident, thus making him irredeemable. Meanwhile, Harley Quinn, who murdered several million people on purpose, is welcomed into the #Resistance because she has realised that murder is actually bad, therefore becoming extremely redeemable, which is rather convenient for DC because she happens to be very popular and marketable right now.

The entire rest of the Justice League either stay neutral or side with Superman, because nothing is more important than ensuring that they don't measure up to Batman's moral superiority. Superman even comes up with an evil plan to make a pill that gives people super strength and durability. Batman foils this evil plan by stealing the pill and giving it to people that he likes instead, which is better. Also, because the writers were worried that you might still sympathize with the clearly-grieving man who avenged the deaths of several million people, Superman kills a child for talking back to him, just to emphasize how correct Batman is how far he's fallen.

...

In case you couldn't tell, I really don't like Injustice. And what makes it so much more annoying than several stories told in worse comics and games is that it's absolutely brimming with the potential to be amazing. Superman and Batman having a lover's tiff because Superman kills a truly reprehensible villain is a fantastic set-up in which both sides have valid points; despite my strawmanning of Team Batman, there are plenty of reasons why taking the Joker alive would have been better, it's just that these reasons aren't actually brought up at all in the story. It's just assumed that the audience is smart enough to realise that Batman is infallible and always right about everything, and Superman becomes a fascist almost overnight. It's like they got an AI to rewrite Batman: Under the Red Hood, and not one of the good AIs like Cortana or Skynet.

Which is all understandable, because this story was not written to be a story. It was written to accompany a fighting game, joining the dots between set pieces where Deathstroke fights Wonder Woman or Harley Quinn beats the crap out of Doomsday. It's just a shame that in order to do that, they accidentally stumbled upon an incredible idea for a story, and then constantly had to compromise that story either to make the punch punch happen, or because some advertising executive at DC insisted that Batman is the Justice League member who most people relate to - makes sense, since he's the primary Badass Normal of the group - and therefore he must receive the most focus and also be the most heroic, which mandates that every other hero in the game needs to be incompetent, spineless, or secretly a fan of fascism as well. It's hard to put into exact words, but it feels like this story was written either for Syndrome. Or possibly by Syndrome.

The comic does a better job of expanding on the story of the game, but since it also can't deviate too much from the game then it's restricted into the same pitfalls. Weirdly enough, despite having a whole litany of other flaws (The Flash dies like five minutes in?!?) the animated film version arguably has the best story, especially the conclusion, where Superman is not beaten into submission by alternate-universe Superman, but talked down by alternate-universe Lois Lane, and he sees the error of his ways and willingly surrenders. The film also has enough respect for its audience to keep Harley Quinn as a villain throughout, rather than trying to reform her into a hero right after she murdered millions of people, which I appreciate.

Ultimately though, Injustice is just a frustrating waste of a good idea. Characters are underdeveloped, many of them sacrificed - metaphorically or literally - on the altar of making Batman look better, and despite the interesting premise, nothing is ever actually explored. For a genuinely interesting story that covers some similar ground, Kingdom Come is right there, but it will always be disappointing that Injustice stumbled into a potential goldmine, and then filled it up with the results of marketability surveys conducted by board members, and poorly-written excuses for superheroes to punch each other.

Maybe the real 'Injustice' was the fantastic story we could've gotten, but didn't. Or maybe it was the friends we made along the way.

SkullWriter Since: Mar, 2021
04/01/2023 00:00:00

Wow, you almost hate Injustice as much as I do. I didn\'t watch the animated version, I only played the game and read the first season. I gave up after I realized that it switched from being a story about how someone as pure as superman could slip into being a villain to \"Oh shit, we have heroes who could easily beat the crap out of superman... how do we justify them not stopping him so the game can happen?\" and kill them in the stupidest ways possible. For example, Kyle Rayner, one of the strongest lanterns of all time is killed... by a simple ambush by two yellow lanterns. Nightwing dies because he hit his head on a rock, in the same room with three people with enough superspeed to stop bullets midair, but no one saves him. Or Constantine fails to kill superman because he forgot superman had an earpiece, and didn\'t bother to check.

And what\'s worse about all this is that the riddle to \'how could injustice happen?\' is even more awfully simple to answer: Just place it in an universe where said heroes that could stop superman don\'t exist, and reinforce on how Superman wouldn\'t stoop so low if there were people to help him process his grief. But that would mean actually using brains to write the story and having to acknowledge that Batman acting like a paranoid holier-than-thou jackass was bad.

Do you recommend checking the animated movie?

MiinU Since: Jun, 2011
04/02/2023 00:00:00

This upsets Batman, as Superman has basically just permanently removed 70% of his regular workload without asking

This line made me laugh (literally) harder than it should've. There goes his solo comic gig and the Arkham trilogy. That said:

I've never bought into the whole, 'OMG, if Supes ever kills anybody (regardless of justification), he'll become an irredeemable killer'. I refuse to believe he's nearly that fragile, given other heroes have done it out of necessity without going down some dark path from which there was 'no return'. Had Batman simply killed the Joker himself, instead of constantly handing him over to Arkham, he would've prevented him from killing those several million people.

Cloud literally saved the entire planet by killing Sephiroth at the end of Advent Children Complete. Seems pretty logical and reasonable, if you ask me. And the people of Edge felt the same way, because they welcomed him back as a hero, not a murderer. But I suppose Batman would consider Cloud a villain and try to imprison him.

MagisterFlopsy Since: May, 2021
04/03/2023 00:00:00

One VERY important flaw with Injustice that I think you forgot to mention: Wonder Woman was FAR more thoroughly character assassinated than pretty much any of the other Justice League members. They were all pretty heavily assassinated except for Green Arrow, who was against Superman from the Word Go and was killed for it, and Shazam, who was a literal 10-year old who\'s looked up to Superman his whole life so it\'s understandable why he\'d blindly follow Superman, and even HE backs out once Superman REALLY goes off the deep end. But whenever Superman had any inkling that he might be going too far, it was always WONDER WOMAN who was there to convince him that \"No. You haven\'t gone far ENOUGH. You need to be even MORE of a fascist tyrant.\"

marcellX Since: Feb, 2011
04/03/2023 00:00:00

@Miin U

In the case of Superman, it makes more sense. Batman on the other hand, because of his more psychological solo universe, it\'s a mentally unstable man constantly on the blink of becoming the Punisher.

MagisterFlopsy Since: May, 2021
04/03/2023 00:00:00

@marcellX

Yeah. Batman has a perfectly solid justification for not killing The Joker, which he explains beautifully in his iconic speech in Batman: Under the Red Hood. It\'s not that he doesn\'t think the Joker deserves to die and that he keeps getting sent to Arkham instead of receiving the death penalty is justice being done. It\'s that he knows if he kills the Joker, he won\'t be able to stop himself from Jumping Off the Slippery Slope. If he were in character, he probably wouldn\'t have objected to Superman killing the Joker because he knows Superman\'s sense of morality is a lot less mutable than his.

Elmo3000 Since: Jul, 2013
04/03/2023 00:00:00

Oh my goodness, I had not remembered that; that actually makes the way Injustice portrays it so, so much worse.

Batman: Under The Red Hood. Batman knows that the Joker probably deserves to die, but he recognizes that his own moral failings and mental instability would make it a very slippery slope - for him! - and that is why he cannot take the risk of crossing that line. And that makes sense; you kill the Joker because he killed thousands, well, Killer Croc has probably killed hundreds so he has to die too. Penguin has easily killed that many too, so you kill him next. All of a sudden, Batman is a serial-killer. He recognizes that his no-kill rule is not perfect, but it makes sense.

Injustice. Killing the Joker is obviously wrong no matter what, because Batman says so and refuses to elaborate why beyond his Makoto Naegi impression - NO THATS WRONG - and the rest of the Justice League are either spineless cowards (Aquaman, Flash, Green Lantern) too weak to stand up to Superman, who is obviously wrong because he just is, or they were murder-hungry this whole time (Cyborg, Damian Wayne) or they were just outright fascists from the start (Wonder Woman). But the most important thing is that all of them are wrong and Batman is right.

MiinU Since: Jun, 2011
04/03/2023 00:00:00

@Elmo 3000: I'd still find that argument hard to buy into. If Batman is truly that mentally unstable, then why did he take up the mantle in the first place?

I used Cloud for comparison for exactly that reason, because he's suffered his own trauma and psychological issues, but he still recognizes when someone needs to be put down permanently for the sake of the greater good. He's killed Sephiroth twice and was willing to do the same to the Remnants in order to protect the planet. If he hadn't, everyone would have died and it didn't send Cloud spiraling off the deep end. He kills only when he deems it necessary.

Yet somehow, Batman reasons that it's better to continue to turn Joker over to Arkham (which may as well have a revolving door on it), knowing full well that Joker will escape and continue to kill countless others. Or to put that another way: Batman is basically saying that it's better to repeatedly jeopardize/sacrifice the lives of Gotham's citizens just so he won't have to kill the Joker. Really?

MagisterFlopsy Since: May, 2021
04/03/2023 00:00:00

^ Batman took up the mantle because he had no choice. It was the only way he could stay sane after the loss of his parents. In his own words, Bruce Wayne died along with his parents that night, leaving only Batman. One of the main differences between Superman and Batman is that Superman is the mask Clark Kent wears out of necessity, where as Bruce Wayne is the mask Batman wears out of necessity. The DCAU even makes it a canon fact about Bruce that in his own mind, his name is Batman, not Bruce Wayne.

MiinU Since: Jun, 2011
04/03/2023 00:00:00

^I know his origin story. I'm just saying other heroes have suffered similar losses, yet handled it better. Batman lost his parents, as a kid. Cloud lost his entire village (including his parents) at the same age.

MagisterFlopsy Since: May, 2021
04/03/2023 00:00:00

Have you actually PLAYED Final Fantasy VII? Because I have. Cloud was already an adult who was a foot soldier working for SHINRA when Sephiroth destroyed his village and slaughtered his loved ones. You can\'t really compare his origin story to Batman\'s. I mean, you can\'t compare it regardless because people are people and everyone\'s going to cope with trauma of that magnitude differently. But Cloud in particular is very much an apples to oranges comparison.

MiinU Since: Jun, 2011
04/03/2023 00:00:00

^Yes, I've replayed FF VII multiple times and Cloud was not an adult, he was only 16 at the time of the Neblheim Incident, as shown by Crisis Core.

MagisterFlopsy Since: May, 2021
04/03/2023 00:00:00

Alright, fair enough. Still not entirely comparable. There\'s a massive difference in emotional maturity between a 16-year old and an 8-year old, even more massive than the difference between a 16-year old and an adult.

And again, this whole argument is a moot point because everyone copes with trauma differently. You can\'t expect that just because Cloud responded to trauma in one way that Batman would respond in a remotely similar fashion.

Elmo3000 Since: Jul, 2013
04/03/2023 00:00:00

I think the Batman and Cloud comparison is interesting but nothing worth disagreeing over. It\'s interesting to imagine all of the fictional heroes who Batman - at least, Injustice Batman - would consider criminal scum because they killed someone. Cloud, Goku, Captain America, Saitama... himself from that one story where he shot Darkseid.

MiinU Since: Jun, 2011
04/03/2023 00:00:00

Wait — Batman shot Darkseid?? How is that even possible? I thought Darkseid was nigh invulnerable.

SpectralTime Since: Apr, 2009
04/03/2023 00:00:00

It was a special bullet. Not that I’m particularly fond of that story anyway.


Leave a Comment:

Top