Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion WebVideo / Thunderf00t

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Pannic Since: Jul, 2009
Mar 22nd 2016 at 11:51:43 AM •••

"While he is often rude, he always tries to explain why someone is stupid. His opponents... not so much."

Bullshit. Plenty of his detractors have gone into detail about why he's full of shit, from his numerous logical fallacies to his brazen dishonesty to his general shitty behavior.

Fanfiction I hate.
DoctorSleep Since: Nov, 2013
Jan 27th 2016 at 8:01:15 AM •••

Would this entry be considered fair or is it crossing a line?

Unsportsmanlike Gloating: During a heated Twitter debate stemming from Thunderf00t's views on rape prevention, he resorted to calling his opponents trolls and rape enablers while refusing to address any of their points.

Hide / Show Replies
VeryMelon Since: Jul, 2011
Jan 27th 2016 at 10:12:33 AM •••

That's talking about the person, not the show.

Edited by VeryMelon
Pannic Since: Jul, 2009
Oct 29th 2015 at 10:15:35 PM •••

"The internet backlash against her and her ilk was awesome."

He sicced his fanbrats on a small company and its twenty employees. That's not awesome, that's petty and borderline sociopathic.

Also, if he tars all Muslims with the same brush (i.e. they're terrorists/they support terrorism) then yes, he is a bigot.

Edited by Pannic Fanfiction I hate. Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Oct 30th 2015 at 10:03:20 AM •••

Please do not use discussion pages for reviews.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Pannic Since: Jul, 2009
Oct 30th 2015 at 10:24:27 AM •••

Reviews? I'm talking about edits to the article. The article kinda refers to the doc-dropping and subsequent cybervandalization of a small business because of a man's personal feud as "awesome."

EDIT: Okay. I'm going to back off and stop editting the article. I'm clearly not someone who should be near the article due to my stances. However, I'm going to say that for an article about such a controversial figure, the tone of the article makes it look very much like it was written by people who are either fans of him, or are very apologetic for his behavior.

Edited by Pannic Fanfiction I hate.
Pannic Since: Jul, 2009
Felcis Since: Apr, 2009
Sep 19th 2014 at 11:10:42 PM •••

Is it just me or is the tone of editing and discussion on TV Tropes getting dangerously close to Tumblr SJW-standards? If you got problems with the writing, please name specifics or edit it yourself. Just remember to keep some neutrality and respect for the creator in question.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Sep 19th 2014 at 11:35:20 PM •••

It's just you. We are coming down hard on people who use the site for crusades.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Felcis Since: Apr, 2009
Sep 20th 2014 at 11:58:06 AM •••

Not saying that you don't, I just meant that those kind of edits and discussions tend to pop up a lot lately. It indeed often tends to get fixed pretty quickly though, so keep up the good work!

Felcis Since: Apr, 2009
Sep 20th 2014 at 11:58:11 AM •••

[accidental doublepost]

Edited by 31.187.117.243
Top