Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
NiGHTS Since: May, 2011
Sep 6th 2022 at 8:41:43 PM •••

>and the section concludes that there is still unnoticed slave imagery in modern advertising (such as Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben, two brands which weren't retired for being racist until 2020).

I see a big problem here - taking as a FACT the idea that those brands' presentation was racist, even though this accusation was widely mocked as politically correct nonsense and hollow virtue signaling.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 4:51:00 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Swap with the redirect or take other action to stop further misuse, started by nuclearneo577 on Apr 3rd 2011 at 7:41:39 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
XFllo There is no Planet B Since: Aug, 2012
There is no Planet B
May 16th 2017 at 5:54:39 AM •••

Removed per Web Links Are Not Examples:

UltimatelySubjective Conceptually Frameworked Since: Jun, 2011
Conceptually Frameworked
Oct 19th 2012 at 4:22:17 PM •••

Does it count as a "Not Making This Up Disclaimer" if they are making it up, but still use a disclaimer.

I was just wondering if The Chasers War On Everything example really fit this trope.

It sounds more like a case of Blatant Lies (which would be more in line with the way they usually go about making blatantly false subtitles).

I'm not 100% sure of this either way (and I don't recall the specific skit in question) which is why I haven't removed the example. If someone can weigh in with their opinion, I'll look into it further.

"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes."
Katsuhagi Salty Since: Jan, 2001
Salty
Jan 1st 2011 at 3:23:55 PM •••

I went ahead and culled a lot of the potholes to this trope that were inappropriate, hopefully it'll stay that way. I cut it down from over 400 potholes, 2/3 of which were using it wrong. And before you ask my OCD was acting up today.

Face the past and you'll fly ass first into the future. - My Dad Hide / Show Replies
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 1st 2011 at 5:45:45 PM •••

Well I'm glad it was, as that's more than even what I could have done. Thank you.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Katsuhagi Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 1st 2011 at 6:58:29 PM •••

I figured it was better to channel it into something somewhat constructive, and I'd been meaning to do it for a bit.

Face the past and you'll fly ass first into the future. - My Dad
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 1st 2011 at 7:29:03 PM •••

Maybe next time you have a fit and want to be constructive with it, perhaps you could cut a lot of uses of Most Triumphant Example. That's not supposed to be used on trope or work pages.

Edited by DragonQuestZ I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Katsuhagi Since: Jan, 2001
Jan 1st 2011 at 7:55:53 PM •••

Huh, I'll keep that one in mind.

Edited by Katsuhagi Face the past and you'll fly ass first into the future. - My Dad
Katsuhagi Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 3rd 2011 at 9:16:36 AM •••

I just took some out again. Why did we take out the part on the main trope page asking people not to pothole it like that? It seems people still don't get it.

Face the past and you'll fly ass first into the future. - My Dad
addikt Man Tears Fuel Me Since: May, 2010
Man Tears Fuel Me
Malteaser Since: Mar, 2010
Nov 11th 2010 at 9:54:58 PM •••

I added the Dick Van Dyke example. Does that count, or should I go hunting for all the snarky headlines that went with the story?

DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 13th 2010 at 5:03:04 PM •••

Seems someone just declared it should be off. Plus I hate the Weasel Words term "doesn't need".

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
A-l-e-x-99 Since: Dec, 1969
Jun 13th 2010 at 4:08:52 PM •••

Could I Am Not Making This Up be a redirect to this page? They seem to be so similar...

Hide / Show Replies
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 13th 2010 at 4:56:10 PM •••

No. It got used too much, when it didn't fit.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Top