Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / IncestYay

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 7:20:47 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Restore on main namespace, started by EternalSeptember on Oct 17th 2010 at 4:58:26 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 2:29:33 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Cutting the main page, started by arromdee on May 16th 2011 at 4:57:19 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
BNJC1 Since: Jun, 2009
May 19th 2011 at 4:05:25 PM •••

Uh...what happened? Just because this page got locked doesn't mean there's no such thing as Incest Yay. It's a trope in fiction, so it should be documented, no matter how...wrong...it is.

Hide / Show Replies
MarqFJA (Before Recorded History)
May 24th 2011 at 5:23:33 PM •••

Executive decision by Fast Eddie, it appears. See the TRS thread.

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
TweedlyDee BWAAAH! Since: Apr, 2010
BWAAAH!
Mar 13th 2011 at 12:23:13 PM •••

The current image is Just A Face And A Caption. All I see is two blue-haired girls sitting together. Needs a better image.

I TELL YOU HWAT!
SolarisPrime Since: Apr, 2010
Sep 25th 2010 at 12:59:46 AM •••

Hey guys, can we kill the "yay" snowclone here? home up with a clever name with added alliterative appeal or punny name instead? I find that "incest yay" souds awkward. who is with me?

EDIT] Wait, Wait, I got it! Incest Subtext. IT'S AN ASSONANCE, BEE-YOTCH!

Edited by SolarisPrime Hide / Show Replies
Iaculus Since: May, 2010
Sep 25th 2010 at 3:26:40 AM •••

Take it to Trope Repair Shop. That's what it's there for.

What's precedent ever done for us?
tricksterson Never Trust Since: Apr, 2009
Never Trust
Jun 4th 2010 at 10:26:55 AM •••

Should the whole Wizards Of Waverly Place Brother–Sister Incest page be moved here since there isn't any actual incest, it's all Incest Yay on the part of the fans?

Edited by socrate92 Trump delenda est Hide / Show Replies
SomeGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 4th 2010 at 2:03:36 PM •••

Yes.

See you in the discussion pages.
stardf29 Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 4th 2010 at 3:41:19 PM •••

If/once you make the move, go ahead and delete the example I wrote for it. Oh, and might want to move the Code Geass page as well.

Superior Since: Sep, 2009
Jun 6th 2010 at 11:28:45 AM •••

Couldn't we just rewrite their namespaces? They are separate pages for a reason. (they are frickin long, that is).

De gustibus non est disputandum.
tricksterson Since: Apr, 2009
Jun 9th 2010 at 8:10:57 AM •••

Works for me. How do we do that?

Trump delenda est
BigT Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 4th 2010 at 1:54:24 AM •••

You can ask Fast Eddie, but he'll probably tell you to create the new page, and copy the old one there. Then put the old one on the Cut List.

And, while doing it, be sure to explain why the page exists—there are so many examples in this one work that it was crowding out all the rest.

Edited by BigT Everyone Has An Important Job To Do
socrate92 Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 14th 2010 at 2:46:50 AM •••

guys, Justin/Alex is subtextually canon, so I think that page needs to stay where it is now: on the Brother–Sister Incest page. it's a brother-sister relationship with romantic implications.

Edited by socrate92
cynwakefield Since: Dec, 1969
Jun 19th 2010 at 11:17:08 AM •••

  • Bisexual twin models Shane◊ and◊ Sia◊ Barbi◊.

Fishing for opinions here. Only the last image has any implications of Incest Yay at all. What's the point of the links to the others, besides Your Mileage May Vary Author Appeal?

Hide / Show Replies
Superior Since: Sep, 2009
Jun 20th 2010 at 8:52:46 AM •••

I think they are ok, the point of the trope is that once the implication is there, even in a single example, you will start to see it in the more "innocent" pictures as well.

De gustibus non est disputandum.
Top