Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion DesignatedHero / Literature

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Dec 20th 2016 at 1:03:22 PM •••

  • Hermione Granger acts borderline sociopathic in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. She puts a jinx on the sign-up sheet for Dumbledore's Army where if anybody who signs rats them out, they get a permanent disfigurement of boils in the pattern of the word "Sneak" on their face, regardless of whether they were under a Veritaserum or had sympathetic reasons. When Marietta Edgecomb actually does rat out the DA, she did it out of fear that her mother would lose her job at the Ministry of Magic.
Ok, first of all, it was never mentioned that the curse would work if a person would testify under veritaserum. And secondly we're talking about betraying 28 people and getting them thrown out of school, basically ending their magical career. Marietta was afraid for her mother's job, but at no point she considers simply leaving DA, and at no point we're shown that her fears are legitimate. Indeed, Ron's dad is also at the Ministry, and at no point he's afraid that he might lose his job. Actually it was CHO who broke up with Harry because Harry was defending her. Most importantly it was Kingsley how messed up Marietta's memory, and Hermione had nothing to do with it. And if she DID get the pimples gone simply because she doesn't remember her betrayal, she'd be Karma Houdini. Yeah, there is just one small difference. Umbridge did it pretty much For the Evulz, while Hermione did it as punishment for genuine betrayal. It's not like she cut Marietta's face for jaywalking.
  • You honestly can't fault David Yates for removing the Jinx from the film adaptation.
This has nothing to do with the example so no comment I think author of the entry had forgottent the context of the scene. First of all Umbridge had just threatened to use Cruciatus curse on Harry, which is in-universe Moral Event Horizon(and rightfully so), secondly none of the team was armed at the time, and Hermione had to think on the spot. And finally for all they knew Sirius was being tortured at the time and they had to get to ministry ASAP, so they had to deal with the bitch quickly. Overall considering the circumstances it would come across as Designated Evil if Hermione was shown to be wrong for that.

Hide / Show Replies
Silverblade2 Since: Jan, 2013
Jan 11th 2017 at 2:18:48 PM •••

I still stand with the fact that permanantly disfuguring someone for ratting out a secret association is a Disproportionate Retribution. I mostly agree with the rest. I don't think Centaurs in H Pverse are rapists and if Umbridge was raped by a centaur, let alone several of them, she would probably have died like people who try to have sex with horses IRL.

MagBas Since: Jun, 2009
Jan 11th 2017 at 5:39:05 PM •••

Ratting out a secret association to someone that scarred permanently one of the members of the association in question by "lying".

Silverblade2 Since: Jan, 2013
Jan 12th 2017 at 4:32:54 AM •••

I argue that Marrietta probably doesn't know what Umbridge did to Harry.. Also Umbridge butchered Harry's hand while Hermione ruined Marietta's face which is far harder to hide.

SchisselEL1 Bowl-full-of-names Since: Aug, 2015
Bowl-full-of-names
Jan 29th 2016 at 5:21:53 PM •••

Designated hero, literature section (wouldn't add without discussion first) - Siegfried, opera of that name by Wagner. (May have been -meant- to be more likeable, mind...)

(Actually, who needs love when one has music?...)
Top