Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Their "who is always portrayed sympathetically no matter how wrong she is" implies the own work has the same opinion than azul120 about the conflict in question.
No, I was talking about the way the examples were written, not the tropes he/she put. The examples just come off as complaining about how Joyce refuses to accept Lois' apology rather than explaining in a non biased way of how and why the trope fits. It comes off as trying too hard to get readers to sympathize with Lois.The tone needs to be changed, that's all. The example stay. It needs to be edited to avoid conflict. I already edited it, but I don't want an edit war.
Edited by MsCC93
I want to make a confession. I've been edit warring with azul120 on these selected pages on Family Guy regarding how the examples are written. I reverted the Laser-Guided Karma and the Disproportionate Retribution edits to non-biased examples to avoid edit warring, but I'm worried that azul120 would just change it back and add unnecessary complaining.
My problem with azul120's edits is not because the tropes he/she puts for said character are wrong, but because of how his/her examples come off as unnecessarily long, biased (favoring the side of one character over another), and just complaining about another character's understandable (albeit, not justified) actions. He/she even goes as far as to rewriting examples that side with the character he/she has problems with, and attacks the character for her (understandable) points, while ignoring the fact that the said character he is defending is a jerkass with little to no redeeming qualities who is always portrayed sympathetically no matter how wrong she is.
To correct our mistakes, I want the mods to step in and make sure the examples do not come off as biased towards the characters that the examples are written for.