Ask The Tropers

"Another point of confusion are ..." is a separate example, which I'd cut instead of separating for being nonsensical, accusatory to the author, and touching on No Lewdness, No Prudishness. (If people were drawn in by assuming it's ecchi when it isn't and never even looked like, either the troper speaks for themselves or it needs citing what degree of audience were that dense.)

The Genre Roulette part sounds like a valid note, but it could be trimmed. It only needs to clarify what "genres" it's rouletting and how some degree of the audience prefer only one or the other of the two.

I thought Uncertain Audience is used for a work that fails because it doesn't know which audience it wants to attract. Because if it is, this isn't an example considering how successful Zombie Land Saga is.

Uncertain Audience doesn't mention it has to be a flop, only that Target Audience in unclear and alienated some parts of viewers that are interested in one thing and not the other.

Noting here that there's an open wick check for this trope as it attracts misuse for "Why wasn't this work aimed at me?"

“titty zombies”?????? where is this person getting that impression from??

The first part has some validity. I thought it did well in changing from a horror, to a satirical idol show (idols are walking corpses, geddit) to something more like a genuine idol show, but it was a risky approach with no clear existing audience, and the production team have said they were not expecting it to be so successful. And I was rather disappointed by how the music became mostly idol-type songs after the first few episodes (first season, at least).

The second part can go. "Bust size chart" is surely a basic requirement in character sheets to keep things consistent. Sakura's apparent school uniform is weird in how it emphasises the bust, but otherwise it's normal designs for a show like this.

I'd cut "Another point of confusion" and everything after that, yet keep the rest of the entry.

The second bit reads like a (probably incorrect) Best Known for the Fanservice entry shoehorned into an unrelated trope. It's like saying Resident Evil Village was trying to market itself as a porn game because of Lady Dimitrescu.

Agree with pulling, but I'd suggest cutting it a sentence earlier, before "Indeed, a lot of the humor is actually very safe and child friendly mostly relying on funny faces or reaction shots." That bit seems nattery and not all that relevant to the example.

That was my entry. You guys know you could've just PM'd me to clean it up, right?

We could. But also every example here is open-edit, so there's no stopping either approach.

Coda, entries cannot have ownership.

(Let me see the page history...)

Codafett: Sure, that's true but the topic creator wanted to make sure that the entry was okay first and then confirmed it wasnt.

Keep in mind ya'll, this issue is from August.

Links for context about Amonimus's post.

• Codafett adds.
• IkeaHan rewrites.
• alphafire18 rewrites further.
• Codafett reverts a lot of the wording back to their original.
• IkeaHan does a much smaller edit.

IkeaHan is probably in the clear, but Codafett is edit warring.

I actually wasn't sure if that's an editwar because the text was different, but looking closely it does seem Codafett added sentences that were removed.

Bump for mod input. Should the problem with the brought up editwar go to new query or it's enough?

New Query, probably. Mods tend to ignore things like this unless a new query is made.