Does Not Illustrate: Franchise.Madonna

This doesn't tell me "franchise", it's just a picture of her.

This is another one of those... "Is this really a franchise???" pages... Like these can all just be indexed on a Creator page...

Does Madonna really need a Franchise page?

I'd say no. That's not an Image Pickin' issue, though.

Eh, I guess not, but the point becomes irrelevant if we just move the content and picture to Creator.Madonna and call it a day.

I also don't think a franchise is necessary

I'm wondering the same for Frank Zappa.

Pull the pic; I'd support moving the page's info into the Creator page but that's a different topic.

My point is that if we move it to Creator/ now, the image can stay.

While I'm generally in favor of musicians who branch out getting Creator/ pages, most of the info on the page is already on Music.Madonna; it's just the filmography that's not there. If there were also tropes about her career and/or a good description, I'd support moving it all to Creator.Madonna, but for now it's largely redundant to the music page.

(My vote is Cut List, unless someone can whip up a creator page beyond the filmography.)

Edited by Synchronicity on Oct 9th 2022 at 12:20:28 PM

My vote is that we table the image picking discussion, move the discussion to whatever is the correct thread to talk about franchise pages that should really be creator pages, and have the discussion there. Once we've dealt with the page that really shouldn't exist in its current form, then we can worry about the page image.

Yeah, table it.

Yeah, keep until we decide what to do with the page.

Edited by rjd1922 on Oct 9th 2022 at 1:27:46 PM

To tabling and discussing the matter in the relevant thread.