NSFW/Image Macro: Ron The Death Eater

Isn't this kind of an image considered an Image Macro? It even has the stereotypical meme font. I have no suggestions for replacements, but I think this image should be pulled regardless of replacement.

I don’t think this technically counts...it’s not great and I’d love to see another option, but I don’t think it’s pull-worthy.

Weak keep unless someone comes up with a replacement.

Previous thread. I'm gonna vote Keep Until Better Image Suggested in lieu of another suggestion, "canon portrayal vs. fanon portrayal" is really a concise way to go about portraying this. A fanwork where the character looks particularly evil compared to a heroic canon depiction might be an improvement (like the pic on Draco in Leather Pants).

EDIT: Just noticed Harry Potter has its own subpage. Should the current be moved there?

edited 21st Dec '17 10:22:14 AM by Synchronicity

I wouldn't move the current unless we have a replacement for the main page first. I'd rather have a imageless subpage than main page.

Is that Ron image actual fanart? If not, it's Not An Example.

We need either actual fanart, or actual illustrations of actual fanfics.

"Stereotypical meme font"? No, this◊ is the steropeotypical meme font.

The image doesn't need to be an example in and of itself. It needs to illustrate the trope. And it does.

The image gets the point across, unless you're color blind and Pop Culture Osmosis hasn't taught you the significance of 666.

And no, labeling canon and fanon does not make an image macro. An image macro is, by this website's definition, adding amusing words to an otherwise uncommunicative image. If a person is speaking and there are captions on screen, it's not a macro, and when it's a comparison showing a person with altered colors and a tattoos that's not a macro either. These are called explanations.

I vote to close the thread, since no one yet has a replacement image, and it was opened up on, at best, a misunderstanding.

Done. Locking up.