Follow TV Tropes

Following

Does Not Illustrate: The Nudifier

Go To

rafi Since: Jun, 2014
#1: Jan 17th 2016 at 1:17:33 PM

The pic is just a title of an episode of a tv series.

Suggestion. A cropped version of this [1] from To Love Ru

edited 13th Feb '16 2:47:44 AM by rafi

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#3: Feb 19th 2016 at 12:17:01 PM

I think that could work if we used a two-panel format with the upper-left panel being followed by the middle-right one. That said, it might be a bit on the risque side.

Reaction Image Repository
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#4: Feb 19th 2016 at 1:19:29 PM

Non-censored/censored version

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_nudifier.jpg
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_nudifie1r.jpg
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_nudifier2.jpg

edited 21st Feb '16 12:20:35 AM by eroock

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#5: Feb 19th 2016 at 2:00:18 PM

[up] Bottom panel seems too NSFW. [tdown]

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#6: Feb 19th 2016 at 2:27:59 PM

I added a black bar for the crotch area.

Josef5678 Psshhh... from Virginia Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Mu
Psshhh...
#7: Feb 19th 2016 at 2:52:31 PM

Even with the black bar, it still looks a bit close to the NSFW side. Even so, the current image is completely non-indicative of the trope, so it must go.

edited 19th Feb '16 2:52:49 PM by Josef5678

DeisTheAlcano Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Drift compatible
#8: Feb 19th 2016 at 2:56:52 PM

[tup] for pulling regardless of replacement.

devtom TEST Since: Nov, 2015
TEST
#9: Feb 19th 2016 at 3:11:48 PM

test

signature with line break
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#10: Feb 19th 2016 at 3:38:52 PM

The take with the black bar works for me...it's a trope about people being stripped by phlebotinum, any straight depiction's going to be racy to some degree.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#11: Feb 19th 2016 at 3:55:29 PM

I don't think it's NSFW in either version. Also illustrates the trope well.

[down]I don't think you're technically incorrect in what you didn't refrain from not remaining silent about, but what I wrote or didn't write should not be incomprehensible in the least.

edited 19th Feb '16 6:30:57 PM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
Josef5678 Psshhh... from Virginia Since: Jan, 2015 Relationship Status: Mu
Psshhh...
#13: Feb 19th 2016 at 5:08:48 PM

Eh, it could probably fly with black bars. Still, for a less blatant illustration:

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/defabricatordw.jpg
"Defabricator. Does Exactly What It Says on the Tin. Am I naked in front of millions of viewers?"

edited 19th Feb '16 8:54:35 PM by Josef5678

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#14: Feb 19th 2016 at 5:47:54 PM

[up] That combo works well.

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
rafi Since: Jun, 2014
#16: Feb 20th 2016 at 12:13:05 AM

[up]it's confused. seems the opposite of the trope with a naked man get clothes.

I dont think that my suggestion is NSFW. No genitals are visible, is more a Barbie Doll Anatomy.

edited 20th Feb '16 12:13:28 AM by rafi

HeraldAlberich from Ohio (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Gonna take a lot to drag me away from you
#17: Feb 20th 2016 at 12:24:52 AM

[up] I had the same thought initially, but with the caption and the fact that it's on a page called The Nudifier, it works well enough. That said, I think 4.2 is at least as good, and safe enough.

justanid Since: Jan, 2010
TrueShadow1 Since: Dec, 2012
#19: Feb 20th 2016 at 9:04:27 PM

I had the same thought as [up][up][up]. I support 4.2 more since it doesn't have any ambiguity. If too risque, then crop the second panel above the crotch area?

edited 20th Feb '16 9:05:00 PM by TrueShadow1

rafi Since: Jun, 2014
#20: Feb 21st 2016 at 12:01:38 AM

[up]agree. if there is a problem, crop the crotch area.

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#22: Feb 21st 2016 at 8:22:05 PM

4.3's a good compromise. Any other ideas, or should we go ahead and crowner this?

JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#24: Feb 22nd 2016 at 12:55:08 PM

Out of the suggestions I like 4.3 the best so far. The first one is too risque and the second one actually makes it look dirtier because it implies that there's something more under there than just Censor Steam.

The one in 13/15 is okay, but at first glance it looks way more like a clothes creation system, and even in context on the page the other suggestion is clearer on first glance. And also funnier.

Reaction Image Repository
Morgenthaler Since: Feb, 2016
#25: Feb 26th 2016 at 2:11:51 PM

^^^ Crowner's made.

You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"

ImagePickin: TheNudifier
26th Feb '16 2:09:13 PM

Crown Description:

Nominations for replacement images:

Total posts: 29
Top