Follow TV Tropes

Following

Suggestion: Express Lane Limit

Go To

BaffleBlend Hey there! Having fun? from Somewhere Since: Dec, 2012 Relationship Status: LET'S HAVE A ZILLION BABIES
Hey there! Having fun?
#1: Jul 23rd 2013 at 1:20:25 PM

The page had no image, and this was what I thought of when I saw the trope. I don't know if it doesn't correctly illustrate it or if it's too big or something, though, so at the risk of embarrassing myself again, here's my suggestion.

"It's liberating, realizing you never need to be competent." — Ultimatepheer
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#2: Jul 23rd 2013 at 2:25:40 PM

I think that would work if we only used the second the and panel. Less is more, especially when it's mostly dialog. I'd rather only use the third, but it would lose too much context that way.

edited 24th Jul '13 10:12:01 PM by Rethkir

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
peasant Since: Mar, 2011
#3: Jul 23rd 2013 at 2:35:32 PM

[up] I think the first panel adds necessary context to the situation. Without it, you wouldn't really know why they're being like that to one another.

edited 23rd Jul '13 2:35:48 PM by peasant

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4: Jul 23rd 2013 at 5:29:00 PM

1+2 or 2+3...all three is overkill. Also, if that's the entire strip it's not kosher to use it.

edited 23rd Jul '13 5:29:39 PM by Willbyr

BaffleBlend Hey there! Having fun? from Somewhere Since: Dec, 2012 Relationship Status: LET'S HAVE A ZILLION BABIES
Hey there! Having fun?
#5: Jul 23rd 2013 at 8:53:01 PM

Yeah, I had a feeling the whole strip would be too much. I'd personally prefer 2,3 or even 1,3 now that I think about it.

edited 23rd Jul '13 8:53:49 PM by BaffleBlend

"It's liberating, realizing you never need to be competent." — Ultimatepheer
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#6: Jul 23rd 2013 at 9:05:39 PM

I prefer 1&3.

edited 23rd Jul '13 9:05:48 PM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Noaqiyeum Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they) from the gentle and welcoming dark (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: Arm chopping is not a love language!
Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they)
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#8: Jul 24th 2013 at 12:13:07 AM

I'll vote for 1 & 3 as well.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#9: Jul 24th 2013 at 12:26:53 AM

I don't think 1+3 has more necessary context than 2+3, and the latter is more varied in terms of layout, and has less text.

edited 24th Jul '13 12:27:34 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#10: Jul 24th 2013 at 1:01:44 AM

I prefer 2+3 as well. It focuses moreon the checkout, rather than the rivalry.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Melkior Since: Dec, 2011
#11: Jul 24th 2013 at 1:13:34 AM

I vote 1 + 3. I think it just flows better. Panel 2 is just padding.

Absent-minded professor and Neverwinter Nights DM
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#12: Jul 24th 2013 at 4:16:29 AM

How is introducing the characters and random stock phrases relevant? That's padding.

Check out my fanfiction!
Noaqiyeum Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they) from the gentle and welcoming dark (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: Arm chopping is not a love language!
Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they)
#13: Jul 24th 2013 at 9:12:19 AM

It establishes the grandiose and comically petty nature of their enmity.

I don't think padding is a good way to describe panel 2, but I agree that 1+3 flows better.

The Revolution Will Not Be Tropeable
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#14: Jul 24th 2013 at 10:07:11 AM

1 + 3 flows better, but 2 + 3 is more illustrative of the trope and much more visually stimulating.

I vote 2 and 3.

edited 24th Jul '13 10:07:23 AM by Larkmarn

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
peasant Since: Mar, 2011
#15: Jul 24th 2013 at 11:38:02 AM

I don't think 2+3 is more illustrative as the express lane isn't necessarily any faster; especially when this trope is in play. The integral part is its arbitrary limit and the its enforcement. As such, the only "required" panel to illustrate the trope is panel 3. However, in order for the dialogue in 3 to make sense, panel 1 needs to be included.


Addendum: How about a single panel version but with the first line removed?

edited 24th Jul '13 11:49:06 AM by peasant

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#16: Jul 24th 2013 at 8:38:25 PM

[up] That's a decent compromise.

Melkior Since: Dec, 2011
#17: Jul 24th 2013 at 11:20:54 PM

[up][up] I like it. My vote now goes to 15.

Absent-minded professor and Neverwinter Nights DM
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#19: Jul 25th 2013 at 4:22:22 AM

As I said, less is more. That's better. Less to read.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#20: Jul 25th 2013 at 6:27:13 AM

A couple more votes for 15 and we can bag it up.

RoninCatholic Petting Zoo Person Since: Dec, 2010
Petting Zoo Person
#21: Jul 28th 2013 at 12:38:50 PM

I agree, 15 is a good compromise.

I must be cruel, but to be kind That bad may begin, and worse be left behind
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#22: Jul 28th 2013 at 12:42:23 PM

I like #15. A lot.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#23: Jul 28th 2013 at 12:48:02 PM

Called it: The image is up and tagged; no pothole as I don't know the source.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
peasant Since: Mar, 2011
#24: Jul 28th 2013 at 1:28:03 PM

[up] Based on the name mentioned, a Google search led me to "Brewster Rockit: Space Guy!". It appears to have a brief article here, which I have potholed to the image.

Question: Caption or no caption?

My suggestion: "Psst! Tell them that all the Funions only count as one item."

edited 28th Jul '13 1:29:39 PM by peasant

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#25: Jul 28th 2013 at 2:55:47 PM

The lane should be labelled "12 items or fewer".

edited 28th Jul '13 2:57:04 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.

Total posts: 34
Top