Follow TV Tropes

Following

Needs Help: Amazonian Beauty

Go To

KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#76: Jun 18th 2012 at 5:53:34 PM

One suggestion I approve of: even if there's no blatant fanservice, if people in universe comment on both the characters buffness and attractiveness, then it would fit.

Again, depends. The problem is that this unreliable to the point of Citation Needed, which we really should try to avoid. If one character, this one time, mentioned that a character is "buff and attractive", how do we verify that she fits the "defined and massive" portion of the trope unless we can see it or they're described?

Not to mention that Fanservice isn't as strict a definition as one might think. Sure, if she goes prancing around in a bikini, then its fairly obvious. But what if she's say, dressed in a loose fitting T-shirt and cargo pants? Yes, it would show off her muscular arms, and there are plenty of people (myself included) who would find that attractive, but is it fanservice, per se? That's where things get a little fuzzy.

Depends on if a character says they find it attractive. As I said, I thought about expanding the criteria to include Attraction Tropes in addition to Fanservice. In fact, that may actually work.

EDIT: I added that criteria to the description, which should fix your objection, nitrokitty. Sorry for going ahead and doing it everybody, but I wanted to see how that looked before the discussion continued.

edited 18th Jun '12 6:01:12 PM by KingZeal

nitrokitty Since: Jun, 2010
#77: Jun 18th 2012 at 11:06:02 PM

That actually goes a long way towards fixing my complaint, and it nicely lines up with the new definition for Hot Amazon (Amazon Chaser).

Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#78: Jun 19th 2012 at 12:42:23 AM

Yeah, that's a definite improvement.

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#80: Jun 22nd 2012 at 8:07:46 AM

Bump.

Everyone happy with the new changes?

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#81: Jun 22nd 2012 at 11:05:37 PM

That certainly covers the "too narrow" problem. ("Too broad" is a different issue.)

KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#82: Jun 23rd 2012 at 9:43:17 AM

Is it too broad, though?

Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#83: Jun 23rd 2012 at 9:52:32 AM

Well, potentially. That's was the argument for the qualifiers, right?

For instance, Alice is muscular. Bob is attracted to her. Does that make Alice any character type in particular, or have we just learned that Bob is an Amazon Chaser?

Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#84: Jun 23rd 2012 at 10:43:55 AM

[up]Is Bob attracted to her because of her build, or because of her lovely personality?

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#85: Jun 23rd 2012 at 10:50:58 AM

Let's say we don't know. We just added her because Attraction Tropes are in play, in line with Amazonian Beauty's criteria.

Alternatively, let's say he's attracted to her muscles. Again, does the work therefore portray her as an Amazonian Beauty, or as any kind of beauty, or are they just developing Bob's character.

Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#86: Jun 23rd 2012 at 11:06:56 AM

As a singular example, it can be both, or it can be neither. It's hard to tell without explicit references. I wouldn't count it as either if the only reason to put it there is speculation (however reasonable it may be).

It's sort of like having a woman who's in the police force where she's highly regarded, and it's not a desk job. That's all we know. Does that make her an Action Girl? Well, it's likely, but we don't know that, so she doesn't fit the trope.

Now, if more characters (one more is enough) commented on her beauty, or if he looked at another muscled beauty, it would show that the trope(s) is in play, at least to some degree.

edited 23rd Jun '12 11:10:20 AM by Feather7603

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#87: Jun 23rd 2012 at 1:31:50 PM

When we were initially building the trope a while back, we decided against the "attractive BECAUSE of her build" stipulation, because in most cases, it's nearly impossible to prove. Reread my post here for the train of logic why. This is also a problem faced with tropes like Big Beautiful Woman.

In short, "purpose" never works as a trope stipulation. It doesn't work with authorial intent, and it doesn't work here. Whether a guy finds a woman attractive because of or in SPITE of a quality is a very subjective sliding scale. The only way to know for sure is if a character expresses disgust at her looks, which would make her a Brawn Hilda.

edited 23rd Jun '12 1:33:35 PM by KingZeal

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#88: Jun 26th 2012 at 11:21:40 AM

I think this should only include Fanservice Tropes and The Beautiful Tropes. I'm not so sure about Attraction Tropes. Mainly because most of those tropes indexed there don't even belong there, they should be under The Beautiful Tropes and this should just be about a character's looks and portrayal, not some Informed Attribute.

darkclaw Legs of Justice from Right behind you. Since: Dec, 2010
Legs of Justice
#89: Jul 1st 2012 at 8:22:30 AM

If there is any way I can help with the cleanup/fix, please PM me.

I totally hate my avatar. Just saying.
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#90: Jul 1st 2012 at 12:29:54 PM

[up][up] I don't think it would make much of a difference, but I'm not opposed to it, either.

Completely neutral on that action.

captainpat Since: Sep, 2010
#91: Jul 8th 2012 at 10:50:51 PM

Does Korra from The Legend Of Korra fit this trope. I can't tell if she really fits this trope or it's just fans that wanna gush.

KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#92: Jul 8th 2012 at 10:53:54 PM

I say cut. I would have cut her before, but I'm under a temp edit ban.

ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#93: Jul 31st 2012 at 1:23:31 PM

Are we done here? Does any wick cleanup need to happen?

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#94: Jul 31st 2012 at 1:43:05 PM

I think we're done, but another wick check couldn't hurt.

edited 31st Jul '12 1:43:21 PM by KingZeal

ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#95: Jul 31st 2012 at 2:01:31 PM

Okay, next question: will anyone do a wick check, or is that being too optimistic? :P

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
KingZeal Since: Oct, 2009
#96: Jul 31st 2012 at 4:21:00 PM

I've been trying to get to for the past week, but it's pretty low on my "shit to get done" list. Way down into the "if I need to kill some time at any point" territory, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#97: Jul 31st 2012 at 6:28:38 PM

That answers that. Since it doesn't seem to be a huge problem in need of urgent cleaning, let's just lock this up.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Add Post

Total posts: 97
Top