MOD NOTE: Please note the following part of the forum rules:
The initial OP posted below covers it well enough: the premise of this thread is that men's issues exist. Don't bother posting if you don't believe there is such a thing.
Here's hoping this isn't considered too redundant. I've noticed that our existing threads about sexism tend to get bogged down in Oppression Olympics or else wildly derailed, so I thought I'd make a thread specifically to talk about discrimination issues that disproportionately affect men.
No Oppression Olympics here, okay? No saying "But that's not important because women suffer X which is worse!" And no discussing these issues purely in terms of how much better women have it. Okay? If the discussion cannot meaningfully proceed without making a comparison to male and female treatment, that's fine, but on the whole I want this thread to be about how men are harmed by society and how we can fix it. Issues like:
- The male-only draft (in countries that have one)
- Circumcision
- Cavalier attitudes toward men's pain and sickness, AKA "Walk it off!"
- The Success Myth, which defines a man's desirability by his material success. Also The Myth of Men Not Being Hot, which denies that men can be sexually attractive as male beings.
- Sexual abuse of men.
- Family law.
- General attitudes that men are dangerous or untrustworthy.
I could go on making the list, but I think you get the idea.
Despite what you might have heard about feminists not caring about men, it's not true. I care about men. Patriarchy sucks for them as much as it sucks for women, in a lot of ways. So I'm putting my keyboard where my mouth is and making a thread for us to all care about men.
Also? If you're male and think of something as a men's issue, by golly that makes it a men's issue fit for inclusion in this thread. I might disagree with you as to the solution, but as a woman I'm not going to tell you you have no right to be concerned about it. No "womansplaining" here.
Edited by nombretomado on Dec 15th 2019 at 5:19:34 AM
What does it mean to be a man, though the article is looking at it through a rather specific Christian viewpoint, it's not all that bad. The author openly acknowledges that men are privileged, and to be a good person means fighting against that kind of social injustice.
That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - SilaswDopants: He meant what he said and he said what he meant, a Ninety is faithful 100%.
Found this thru RW and thought it would be of interest: http://www.buzzfeed.com/adamserwer/how-mens-rights-leader-paul-elam-turned-being-a-deadbeat-dad#.tuDJy9j2YK It's a look at Paul Elam and what he's really like. Sorry if this or something like it has already been posted.
edited 18th May '15 4:26:17 AM by OdinsLeftEye
The name's Axel. Wanna check out Aim 4 The Head, my Zombie Apocalypse spoof comic?: http://www.smackjeeves.com/comicprofile.php?id=138048Oh, Christ, Buzzfeed. This is gonna be painful...
Because there aren't any institutional biases against men in those areas. Nopity nope nope. I mean, it's not like divorced women are allowed, nay, encouraged to continually suck their ex-husbands dry for child support, even if they're in jail or HOMELESS. Geez, the way those wacky MR As talk, it's almost as if a woman can rape an underaged boy and then successfully sue her victim for child support money! Good thing THAT'S not true!
Oh, you mean the jackass who explicitly said that it's not rape when a woman forces a man to penetrate her◊, and only retracted his statement after his normally sycophantic followers called him out on it?
Because when looking for an objective viewpoint on a man's actions, there's no one more reliable than the man's ex-wife!
No. Wrong. Incorrect. The Red Pill and the men's rights movement are NOT the same. In fact, the Red Pill subreddit explicitly states that it has no interest in men's rights activism:
Now I've never been shy about mentioning that I think Elam just flat out sucks, and from the story, it does sound like Elam is in the wrong here, and abandoning his children was absolutely a dick move. But when he talks about how horribly fathers are treated by the family court system... well, he's not wrong.
Again, it seems like the Jerkass Has a Point. Why shouldn't he be allowed to take a paternity test to see if the kid is his?
These, I'll be the first to admit, are the unhinged ramblings of a raving lunatic. Yes, women commit domestic violence far more often than most people think, but to blame that fact on some "frenzied path to vengeance" is, well, questionable at best and misogynistic at worst.
Of course they're not. Why would you fight a battle you know you're going to lose anyway?
Oh, hey, the NNEDV. The same organization who has this◊ to say about male victims of domestic violence. Basically, their attitude can be summed up as, "okay, yeah, sometimes men are abused BUT WOMEN STILL HAVE IT WORSE SO SHUT UP."
Which, by the way, is debatable.
So here we see some acknowledgement from the writer that men's issues exist and that they matter, which is more than I can say for a lot of feminists. So, you know, props.
Citation: The National Task Force to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Against Women.
Kind of like proving that Apple's products are defective by citing a public statement from the CEO of Microsoft, wouldn't you say?
I don't know if this is a bug or whatever, but the article they link to here has nothing to do with VAWA. Besides, anyone with even a cursory knowledge of the Duluth Model would know that that statement is laughably untrue.
...and? What are they trying to say here? That if you're smaller than the person you're abusing, you should be allowed to hit them all you like and they're scum if they try to fight back?
By that logic, if Screech Powers got into an argument with, say, She Hulk, he'd be perfectly within his right to slap her, right? She's bigger and stronger so that makes it okay, right?
Yes, and now it's "penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus". Which is, to be fair, definitely an improvement, since it includes men who were raped... by other men.
But a woman who drugs a 14 year old boy and goes to town on him? Nope. Not rape.
Again, this is why I think Elam is a scumbag. If that was a joke, it was in incredibly poor taste and it just makes him look like a psychopath.
But considering the fact that #Killallmen was turned into a popular hashtag, I don't think the anti-MRA crowd has any room to talk.
It's a little difficult for me to sympathize with the woman who proudly proclaims to "bathe in male tears", but I will say that the verbal abuse she received at the hands of Elam's camp was absolutely inexcusable. Again, fuck Elam.
So Elam wanted to give a conference, but he was bombarded with death threats from people who just wanted to prevent him from speaking his mind. Looks like he and Valenti are Not So Different, eh?
And that's about all I have to say on the article. Overall, it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be, but there were definitely some moments that reeked of bias.
It's really depressing that A Vf M is all we've got when it comes to mainstream men's rights activism. The movement deserves better than that.
I love to learn, I love to yearn, and most of all... I love to make money.Buzzfeed and Reddit? Who let the nutty parts of the internet in?
There are plenty, it's the idea that they're due to "institutionalized feminism", that's laughable. Feminism has been a good ally to breaking down gender roles for men, it's not (mainstream non-internet-nutjob feminists) enforcing stupid male gender roles on men.
No it's really depressing that people think that that's all we've got. A Vf M has nothing to do with men's rights, it's an anti-feminist group. You want a group campaigning for men? We've got a list somewhere, for now I can give you the Campaign Against Living Miserably[1], a group in the UK focused on men's mental health issues and the challenges men face seeking help, they put out little booklets at universities and everything.
I'll try and find the big list, I know it's somewhere.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranThe key word here is "mainstream". How many people have heard of the Campaign Against Living Miserably, compared to the number of people familiar with A Voice for Men?
I love to learn, I love to yearn, and most of all... I love to make money.In the real world? Probably more for CALM, seeing as they're a very active campaign in the UK (again they put out leaflets on mental health at unis). I know that there are more campaign groups out there, the list is somewhere in this thread actually.
Also I don't grant your premise that AVFM is a men's issues group, they may claim to be but what is the main focus of the group? Helping men or fighting feminists? I'm pretty sure it's the second. Now fighting the nutty parts of feminism may well be a good goal, but it's nothing to do with men's issues, especially when groups like AVFM are out there hurting men's issues by reinforcing the stupid painful gender roles that are hurting so many men.
Edit: Seriously, anyone got the bloody list? I thought I saved it somewhere but I can't find it. Didn't we used to have a notes feature or something?
edited 20th May '15 4:37:54 AM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranHow well known are they outside the UK?
I don't dispute that, but I'm talking about how they're viewed. If you call yourself a men's rights activist in public, you'll probably either get laughed at or spat on. And why? Because when most people think of men's rights, they don't think of CALM or The Good Men Project. They either think of A Voice for Men or that stupid "meninist" hashtag that was trending a couple months ago.
Okay, I don't deny that AVFM is a scummy organization, but how are they reinforcing gender roles?
I love to learn, I love to yearn, and most of all... I love to make money.So don't use the term "Men's Right Activist", go for "Person who cares about men's issues", MRA isn't the only term out there, I don't like changing term because a group of assholes have hijacked the term but they kinda have, it's not worth the fight.
No idea, I like in the UK, so someone else will have to comment on that.
Beyond their aggressive hatred of all feminism (a movement largely about the breaking down of gender roles), a lot of their writing harkens back to the idea of women having a proper 'place' and men having another 'place'. The focus of a lot of their 'advise' seem to be on being a stereotypical 'man' to become 'better'. Plus there's the overlap that it has with a lot of proponents of toxic ideas of masculinity.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranIt's not even really a hijack. Most people never heard the phrase "Men's Rights Activist" until groups like AVFM came about. That's the main reason I'm comfortable with people genuinely passionate about issues affecting men finding a different term: rather than being hijacked by hate groups, that one appears to have actually been invented by them.
My Tumblr. Currently liveblogging Haruhi Suzumiya and revisiting Danganronpa V3.That's what I see with the term SJW but I've been told that I'm wrong.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranMmmmmm, so what would be a good name for men activist who doent implie and anti-feminist agenda?
edited 20th May '15 11:38:21 AM by unknowing
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"The difference is that SJW is a pejorative term.
MRA was invented to self-identify. SJW was invented to insult.
My Tumblr. Currently liveblogging Haruhi Suzumiya and revisiting Danganronpa V3.Men's issues activist? I think that has a nice ring to it.
...for women.
If they really are concerned about helping men, they've sure got a funny way of showing it.
I love to learn, I love to yearn, and most of all... I love to make money.I don't think that people will see Men Issues Activists as anything other than Missing in Action.
edited 20th May '15 3:20:16 PM by AngelusNox
Inter arma enim silent legesNot to mention that it's already taken as an acronym.
edited 20th May '15 3:22:25 PM by Quag15
We disagree on this. to avoid rehashing old ground let's just say that we both have our positions and seem unable to convince the other.
Men's Issues seems to be the one that's gained ground, as MIA is kinda used for a bunch of things Men's Issues Campaigner or "MIC" could work.
There's a knock on effect, the more women become breadwinners the more men can become caregivers. Plus while some feminists don't push for Men's Issues some do, look at Emma Watson coming out hard against society for not valuing her father's role as a parent. We've got a lot of overlap and allies within feminism and going after people who are fighting our fight alongside the feminist fight is counter productive.
edited 20th May '15 3:55:42 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranWomen are not obligated to advocate for men's rights any more than Chinese Americans are obligated to advocate for Latino American rights.
The mark of a human rights advocate is that regardless of their focus, they do not allow that to come at the expense of other groups even if they do not include those groups in their focus.
As Silas pointed out, many of these groups have overlapping goals and it is by attacking the problems from multiple perspectives, these problems can be solved faster and for the benefit of the whole.
"Psssh. Even if you could catch a miracle on a picture any person would probably delete it to make space for more porn." - AszurIn theory, yes. In practice, it doesn't seem like that's happened. While it's become socially acceptable for women to be career- driven, men in any sort of childcare occupation, be it teacher, daycare worker or house-husband, are seen as spineless weenies at best and goddamn pedophiles at worst.
The problem is that for every Emma Watson, there are like a dozen Bahar Mustafas.
(Can you believe there's actually a hashtag dedicated to DEFENDING that piece of filth?)
I love to learn, I love to yearn, and most of all... I love to make money.It's not as great an effect as I'd like I admit. That's why we need a good grassroots groundgame, because while we get the odd benefit from Feminism we need our own movement for our own issues. Now to go back to my wider point, AVFM do men seeking to break down gender roles no good by aggressively campaigning against pretty much all Feminism.
I'd question that number, but even if it is true (which I don't think it is), I'm pretty confident that the Emma Watson's of the world have more than 12 times the influence, following as ability to bring about change.
Yes, because Twitter. Seriously it's fucking Twitter, half the folks on there are trolls and half are the worst kind of bigiots and hate fuckers you'll find on the internet. Welcome to the uncivilised internet, there's a reason I stick to the civilised internet.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranThat men who take on feminine roles are seen as weak, means that femininity is still seen as inferior to masculinity. So this is something feminism actually does adress.
edited 20th May '15 5:54:50 PM by Antiteilchen
Again: feminism and a men's issues movement should be complimentary, not opposing. Just because there's overlap, or one tangentially helps the other, doesn't mean that there's not room for both or that only one is necessary.
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.Of course. The thing about being labeled a pedophile is an issue that only affects men and needs to be adressed by men's issue... guys.
Jeremy Kyle did something good... I knew I was in bizarro world over here the moment that bloody exit poll came out...
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran