|
|
![]() Pretty flower.
I don't see that as a Take That. Maybe choice/choose line is, but overall while the Refuse ending seems kinda passive-aggressive to the fans it doesn't seem to be a slap to them.
Pending future advertisement.
![]() Lord of Castamere
The problem is that nothing in that ending says how they actually won; the Woman in the ending doesn't mention the Crucible at all, only that they learned from the previous cycles mistakes. Which could mean a lot of things.
I already mentioned that Bioware did say how they defeated the Reapers. So no, 'tis not in my mind. You should have read my previous posts more carefully. It comes from some BSN forum posts. I will now search for them.
Voilá, here on TwitterEither way, it sounds too much like complaining about endings you don't like to me.
I'm saying that the above counts as a Take That Audience and I made clear that it was just my opinion. I did not say we should add "Goddamn Refuse ending sucks" to the entry. I tried to explain why I think that way, you just called it "whining" and "complaining about endings you don't like" and only said that we don't know what the next cycle used, which I have addressed above. So please, I'm not the one whining.
We should be able to have a discussion without the term "whining" starting to fly around. Focus on the argument, not the person, and all that.
edited 26th Jun '12 10:23:48 PM by Anfauglith Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
![]() ![]() Lord of Castamere
Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
![]() Lord of Castamere
No, no. I don't believe we should replace old entries, just add that it was changed by the EC. The original game still exists, it was not real-life retconned out of existence.
This is one of my fears, that we will lose many valid old entries. It was a DLC that changed the endings, but we should still trope the original ones.
edited 26th Jun '12 11:57:56 PM by Anfauglith Instead, I have learned a horrible truth of existence...some stories have no meaning.
![]() ![]() Ravenous Sophovore
As a possibility, you could soft split the page, as is done on La Pucelle (which got 3 new endings and ditched the old one when it got an Updated Rerelease), to put tropes that apply to the old endings (or new endings) in a separate part of the page.
edited 27th Jun '12 6:26:53 AM by ccoa Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
There is a ridiculous number of entries here that use the abomination "this troper". This Troper is not allowed on the wiki, and they need to be removed.
I was about to do so myself, but it would involve chainsawing large numbers of entries. So I thought I'd post here and give people a chance to rewrite them themselves if they're so inclined.
If it isn't done in a reasonable amount of time (say, one week?), I'll just delete them all.
I figure that this is probably the best avenue for figuring out how we're going to do this.
Reek, reek, rhymes with...
![]() Gentle Planeteater
There is going to be a huge amount of YMMV from the fallout of the Extended Cuts, so get ready for that.
![]() Bieber My Balls
Trying to do a bit of clean-up of the "this troper" stuff on the Heartwarming page.
This post was thumped by moderation to preserve the dignity of the author. The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
TV Tropes by
TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Privacy Policy |