The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

Valid trope; the examples probably need a look but I don't see a reason to cut it wholesale.

Eh, what Willbyr said. It happens in fiction as well as real life (e.g. the in game equivalent of Ashbury-Haight in GTA San Andreas has a theater advertising a film called "The Wizard of Ass"). Someone else will have to do the looking though. I'm with family and the internet connection is a bit spotty, never stable for more than about 5 min. at a time.

Mmkay. In that case, question. Do we usually strike porn examples from Sex Tropes?

If so, I think we should call it In Universe Examples Only. 'cause almost all of those top examples are pornographic works with titles that are puns on a more famous work.

edited 27th Nov '13 8:35:40 PM by Ramidel

I think the rule is, as long as the entry itself isn't describing something graphic it's okay.

We have gone through that page already a couple of times, for what it's worth.

Hm. Not sure that the top shelf of this isn't still essentially a porn index by its very nature, but I suppose it isn't causing any problems.

All the "porno titles" are potholed to the work they are derived from, which is usually not a porno.

Doubleposting to note the the only work here can be checked off as done - there doesn't seem to be a forum thread.

We got a new flag: Derpys Finest Hour

Reason: "It's porn and pedophilia without plot, and even gets compared to the previously-cut Sweet Apple Mssacre[sic]."

Well, it looks like we got another pony fanfic to peruse, folks. By "we," I mean us P5 Guys, of course.

edited 7th Dec '13 2:30:48 PM by Komodin

A clopfic. And here I was looking for an excuse to drink, and one comes knocking on my door. Great.

This one doesn't seem so much a clopfic, more like just gorn and pedophilia for shock purposes

edited 7th Dec '13 4:32:47 PM by strawberryflavored

Yeah, good luck with that.

It seems to less be porn, the author explicitly states they wanted to make the sickest shock fic they could.

We got another flag: Seikon No Qwaser

Reason: "Not sure whether this one's been looked at before. If not, our page implies extensive paedo-pandering, particularly in the Lolicon entry."

... Didn't we cover this before? If not, is anyone here familiar with this work?

We might have at some point. Pretty sure it's just another awful, if slightly more explicit than usual, ecchi series.

From what I can find, it was brought up really early, when lists were first being made, for having a lot of fanservice (the plot involves the characters getting magical powers from sucking breasts). It was brought up a couple times later, but it was never flagged on the voting tool, and it seemed to have never really been looked into.

Yeah, I flagged that. Two entries that stood out to me in particular:

• Deliberately Cute Child: Katja in public is the most adorable little thing you could hope to meet. Katja in private is a domineering sexual predator with a talent for bondage and a taste for older women.
• Lolicon: Hana. Katja's intro chapter makes this abundantly clear. Taken Up To Eleven in the anime, where, near the end up the fourth episode, it shows Hana very happily licking Katja "down there". Ayame was a little too happy to help Katja with the Toilet.

Either this (and much of the other stuff about Katja) is factually inaccurate, or both the manga and the show cross our line on paedo-pandering (given the nature of the show, it's extremely unlikely that none of this is being played for titillation).

edited 7th Dec '13 6:53:22 PM by Iaculus

That Lolicon entry... well, we're off to a good start already. I didn't know it was that pervy.

This wiki has a gallery with some samples of what she does, should help with preliminary evaluation. Aforementioned Hana and Anyame are seen here◊, the bottom right and bottom left respectively.

On the pony fic: it sounds like it is not even trying to pretend it has any plot beside shock and sex.

edited 7th Dec '13 7:56:50 PM by Adannor

Well, I already knew it had sketchy stuff involving something called "embryos" (or something like that) as well as lactation fetishism stuff, so if you verify that lolicon stuff you might have your answer right there.

Then again, it probably depends on how explicit this stuff with Katja is. Even harmless stuff like Toradora could sound pretty questionable with the right wording.

True.

As for that pony fic, I finished reading it and I feel ...unclean. Thankfully alcohol is a useful disinfectant.

• Looks at page for Derpys Finest Hour*

I'm not a P5, but if I may intrude with a educated opinion:

BURN IT, BURN IT TO THE GROUND AND DROWN THE ASHES IN HOLY WATER. DAMN THE CREATOR OF THAT PAGE FOR BRINGING THAT TRAVESTY TO MY ATTENTION.

edited 8th Dec '13 11:59:03 AM by shoboni

... Yeah, that pony fic gotta go. Devilhead.

Strangely enough, a GIS of just the title for Sn Q produced much more NSFW stuff than a search for either of those characters. Still, overall, I think this one will get devilheaded out of here just on what I saw of the manga...it appears to be on the same level as Aki Sora for content.

edited 8th Dec '13 9:01:12 AM by Willbyr

IIRC, Aki Sora had actual penetrative sex, while Qwaser does not.

That much is very true, yeah. Still, with what I'm seeing from Seikon, I'm leaning towards giving it a devilhead. If anyone has anything to say in favor of it, then speak up.