However, it looks like it's difficult for us to trope works that are solely pornographic, because we have trouble keeping it to acceptable levels for our ad providers.
Did they clarify what they expect to see done before they restore the ad service? Because last I heard, the original appeal to Google was rejected without the slightest actual explanation, and Eddie was going to seek contact with an actual Google official to get some actual answers.
The trouble is it isn't just google advertisers, Eddie personally wants some stuff gone regardless of whether it is acceptable to google.
Which is what most of the complainers have a problem with; for all the bad points that can be said about Wikipedia (and yes, I know We Are Not Wikipedia
; doesn't mean we can learn from their example), you don't see its owner(s) imposing their collective personal preferences/biases/whatever-you-call-them on the site wholesale about what it should document beyond the understandable rule of notability (at least, AFAIK). I really mean no offense to Fast Eddie, but if TV Tropes
is really supposed to adhere to his personal preferences even if said preferences clash with the site's mission
, then he really ought to amend said mission to reflect that.
edited 14th Apr '12 2:52:14 PM by MarqFJA