|
Total posts: [291] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Removing complaining, bashing and other negativity from the wiki: ![]() Another Wizard Boy
Inspired by this thread![]() Temptation lies in the forbidden. Some doors should never be re-opened.
![]() ![]() Heroic Jerkwad
The page for Steven Seagal is basically one long Take That against him. I don't know much about him besides that he's not very popular, but pointing out every little thing that makes him suck is a bit far.
A knavish speech sleeps in a foolish ear. | For all dramatic realisations.
Hammer of the Pervs
Ugh, you're right. I hate the idea that just because a certain public figure isn't popular right now, he should be fair game for bashing on a wiki like ours. On the forums, fine, but not on the creator pages. I watch the Frank Miller page just to remove that kind of bullshit, but of course I'm actually a Frank Miller fan. Seagal is a huge douche-bag, but that shouldn't matter to us at this site.
edited 27th Mar '12 9:29:32 AM by Martello "Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.
![]() edited 27th Mar '12 1:57:08 PM by Catbert ![]() Another Wizard Boy
And it has the umpteenth debate about YMMV in YKTTW.
I think that if we can't add some strong objective criteria to it, the guaranteed Opinion Creep will make it a TRS or cutlist guest.
![]() Temptation lies in the forbidden. Some doors should never be re-opened.
![]() I like this webcomic.
edited 28th Mar '12 1:21:26 AM by TheOneWhoTropes Well, Little Britain thinks it's a different country.
![]() Awesome Merchant
I'm all for making things less negative around here. The Steven Seagal "article" is a prime example of something in need of a rewrite or even a page lock, so that no one can sneak negativity back on there.
A few other examples of things that get bashed are The Secret Life of the American Teenager (does it have "abysmal writing"? Possibly. Do we need to have that particular wisdom bequeathed to us even on the YMMV page? No.) and the Silent Hill page, albeit less so. I'm sure we'll come up with more examples. I'll try to cut/reword plain ol' bashing, should I encounter it on the wiki.
![]() Please consider, if you can, donating to my late cousin's memorial fund. Thank you.
![]() Heroic Jerkwad
Well, I cleaned up Seagal's page. Turns out the discussion for it isn't entirely nice either ("Yeah...why do I think it's Fast Eddie's fault? Oh, yeah, because Eddie always does shit like that." "Does Steven Seagal really need protection from a hatedom?"). The comments are from last year, but should I report it at ATT anyway?
A knavish speech sleeps in a foolish ear. | For all dramatic realisations.
![]() Another Wizard Boy
Yes, report it. Or holler it, linking to the dsicussion.
![]() Temptation lies in the forbidden. Some doors should never be re-opened.
The Sonic Wiki Curator
Yeah, I can see that turning into a complaint-and-justifying-edit hive in no time flat. It should probably be scrapped or reworked extensively.
edited 5th Apr '12 11:57:33 AM by Komodin ![]() edited 8th Apr '12 12:28:38 AM by Oreochan "Learning without thinking is labor lost. Thinking without learning is dangerous."
![]() ![]() Awesome Merchant
That's not a trope, it's an audience reaction. It's like a more specific version of Seasonal Rot, so I say, ditch it. Will anyone really be entertained by reading about something like that? And not just a Hatedom.
![]() Temptation lies in the forbidden. Some doors should never be re-opened.
![]() ![]() Another Wizard Boy
The page Robert Stanek was just reported on Ask The Tropers for having been hit by a vandal. I've repaired the vandalism and cleaned the example section, but someone should take a look at the description since it seems to be Creator Bashing.
TV Tropes by
TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Privacy Policy |