Follow TV Tropes

Following

Integrate Literature Examples: Science Fantasy

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Feb 27th 2012 at 11:59:00 PM
Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#1: Feb 12th 2012 at 8:34:06 PM

In this YKTTW for science fantasy, ccoa brought this up:

"Science Fiction Versus Fantasy is kind of a mess. It's partly about how you can divide those genres and when it's fuzzy. Partly about how they can be combined. Partly about the conflict between the two. And a very small part about how works that combine both can be marketed as either."

So, what do we do? Clean up the examples, or change the name and description to match most of the examples?

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#2: Feb 12th 2012 at 9:24:08 PM

Good question. A very good question indeed.

My gut instinct is that this is about the relationship between Sci-Fi and Fantasy. The description reads more like an essay than a trope, though, and I'm having trouble getting much more out of it than that.

Briefly skimming the examples section, the examples appear to be something like "Sci-Fi/Fantasy Grab Bag": works that include elements commonly associated with each, like robots + dragons or aliens + wizards. This is probably what happens when you toss Sci-Fi elements into a Fantasy Kitchen Sink; think that's tropable?

edited 12th Feb '12 9:27:11 PM by troacctid

Rhymes with "Protracted."
Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#3: Feb 13th 2012 at 4:22:14 AM

How about making it a Useful Notes page about the conflict/history between Sci-Fi and Fantasy, since it would be a shame to remove all of that information?

edited 13th Feb '12 4:22:24 AM by Ekuran

abk0100 Since: Aug, 2011
#4: Feb 13th 2012 at 4:47:56 AM

I actually like most of the example section.

Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#5: Feb 13th 2012 at 4:56:54 AM

I like the essay and I would be loath to ditch it, but it reads like a Useful Notes page or an Anaylsis page rather than a trope.

I would suggest launching the Science Fantasy page currently under development in YKTTW, to be used as the trope for works that combine science fiction and fantasy.

Make this into an Anayslis page for Science Fantasy.

Alternativly, we can shift this into Useful Notes and move the examples to Science Fantasy.

BTW:

Science Fiction Versus Fantasy found in: 129 articles, excluding discussions.

Since January 1, 2011 this article has brought 281 people to the wiki from non-search engine links.

That's reasonably good stats for something of this nature, especially the inbounds. We should definatly not cut it entirely or chainsaw the essay.

edited 13th Feb '12 5:00:52 AM by Catbert

ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#6: Feb 13th 2012 at 7:47:01 AM

I like that suggestion. I'd go with Analysis rather than Useful Notes, personally, since it is analyzing the genres. Although it may be more of an analysis of Speculative Fiction in general rather than specifically Science Fantasy.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#7: Feb 13th 2012 at 9:11:58 AM

It can see it working for Speculative Fiction. The current name could become a redirect to Analysis.Speculative Fiction. Science Fantasy can take over the examples. Science Fantasy can also be linked on the Analysis.Speculative Fiction page.

Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#8: Feb 15th 2012 at 6:45:34 AM

Seeing that we now have several viable options on the table, I've created a crowner.

BobbyG vigilantly taxonomish from England Since: Jan, 2001
TBeholder Our future is a madhouse from chthonic safety Since: Jan, 2001
Our future is a madhouse
#10: Feb 24th 2012 at 5:29:43 AM

Hm. Fandom trope?

...And even I make no pretense Of having more than common sense - R.W.Wood
blackcat Since: Apr, 2009
#11: Feb 24th 2012 at 6:32:13 AM

Clocking to see if there are more opinions.

Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#12: Feb 25th 2012 at 9:10:30 AM

What is a clock supposed to mean in this context? Countdown to closing the thread or calling the crowner?

edited 25th Feb '12 9:10:42 AM by Catbert

Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#13: Feb 25th 2012 at 9:24:42 AM

I prefer using the term Science Fantasy for works combining those.

For me it doesn't really matter where the essay part is placed, but it shouldn't be on the example page. However, considering that the essay itself makes comparisons to Speculative Fiction, that's probably the best place.

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14: Feb 25th 2012 at 9:39:54 AM

[up] To calling the crowner, I think. It is supposed to be for closure but i guess that this use doesn't harm either.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Gatomon41 Since: Mar, 2010
#15: Feb 25th 2012 at 11:25:42 AM

I agree with Catbert. Separate the analysis and examples into separate pages.

edited 25th Feb '12 11:25:54 AM by Gatomon41

I’m tired of the sexist garbage going on this site. I’m leaving, this site now just trash.
Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#16: Feb 28th 2012 at 1:59:36 PM

I think it can be called now.

blackcat Since: Apr, 2009
#17: Feb 28th 2012 at 2:31:22 PM

Calling the crowner. Locking the crowner.

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#18: Mar 4th 2012 at 8:40:10 PM

I moved the essay over to the analysis page of Speculative Fiction, but I'm guessing it needs a few edits to make it a bit more generalized.

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#19: Mar 12th 2012 at 8:54:41 AM

I think Science Fantasy is ready to launch, although the description can use a little work.

BrentLaabs from Planet Eris Since: Jun, 2010
#20: Mar 12th 2012 at 9:11:33 PM

Yeah, a line like "It could be said that almost all Science Fiction and Fantasy stories are in fact Science Fantasy." would make me want to add every piece of Speculative Fiction out there.

I took a stab at rewriting the intro on the theory that we're looking for something that has a combination of a lot of Science Fiction tropes and a lot of Fantasy tropes.

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#21: Mar 12th 2012 at 10:12:16 PM

Yeah, that description is much better.

On the other hand, I think there's more of a sliding scale of sci-fi and fantasy elements. I guess we can gloss over that by saying some works may slant towards one or the other, while still containg both elements.

BrentLaabs from Planet Eris Since: Jun, 2010
#22: Mar 12th 2012 at 10:43:27 PM

Well, yeah, there is definitely a continuum, SF and Fantasy definitely don't have to be in equal measure. It should probably be mentioned on the page, but editors' natural inclination to drift might take care of a lot of that on it's own.

The Wikipedia page on Science Fantasy is a mess, on their terms anyway: "For many users of the term, however, "science fantasy" is either a science fiction story that has drifted far enough from reality to "feel" like a fantasy, or a fantasy story that is attempting to be science fiction." Followed by a string of [citation needed]s.

We're just going to have to choose to constrain it somewhere. If we choose a broad constraint (sliding scale from science fiction to fantasy), we'll end up getting a large swath of the non-horror Speculative Fiction works. Which would be fine. If we choose something more narrow (combined science fiction/fantasy settings), we get a subset of works that blur the line or use Genre-Busting. I think the latter is more interesting, because Speculative Fiction covers the former already (but it's not necessarily the correct view).

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#23: Mar 12th 2012 at 10:59:10 PM

The latter does sound interesting, but it would probably be subject to Trope Decay and turn into the former, so I think we should keep it broad.

At least it contains the latter as an Internal Subtrope, so it's not all bad.

edited 12th Mar '12 11:00:45 PM by Ekuran

BrentLaabs from Planet Eris Since: Jun, 2010
#24: Mar 13th 2012 at 1:19:50 PM

I went to read Tropes Are Flexible and convinced myself that you're right.

Added a little bit more on that and linked to Analysis/SpeculativeFiction. Ready to launch?

Ekuran Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
#25: Mar 14th 2012 at 11:02:21 AM

I'm guessing we should change the wicks that refer to Science Fiction Versus Fantasy when they're really referring to Science Fantasy, and move the examples over to Science Fantasy (with some alterations).

edited 14th Mar '12 11:44:39 AM by Ekuran

15th Feb '12 6:34:11 AM

Crown Description:

Science Fiction Versus Fantasy at present combines two purposes.

On the one hand, it is a rather lengthy essay comparing the two genres, and eventually transitioning into mention of the fact that some works combine elements from both. Some have argued that the description make the purpose of the page unclear and would be more appropriate for an Analysis/ or Useful Notes style page.

On the other hand, it is collecting examples of works that combine the two genres.

According to The Other Wiki, the term used for stories that do this is Science Fantasy, which is currently a redirect.

At present, there is a Science Fantasy trope being proposed in YKTTW; however it has been put on hold pending a decision on what to do with this trope.

Total posts: 52
Top