Disney collaborates with erotic artist on artbook

Pretty much what the topic says, really

Talk about Bleached Underpants. When did Disney suddenly grew a pair and became openminded?

Also, am I the only one who finds that Tinkerbell art to be actually pretty sexy? This made me feel rather confused, really.

Wait what. Seriously?

...I...I feel so confused. This is the same Disney right? They knew right?

THE WORLD NO LONGER MAKES SENSE TO ME.

i no rite? The whole thing is just confusing. Every part of it. I mean, Disney is a huge company that has been involved with lots of family-unfriendly business. But this is, like, they asked an erotic artist to make an art book on Disney Classics.

Well, if the art is good, I won't complain. Might even buy it, if ABC Amsterdam carries it. But the artist does have a problem with Only Six Faces.

edited 10th Jul '11 7:53:54 AM by Kayeka

Disney: "We heard those girls with animal ears were pretty popular, so we wondered if we might not have other uses for Minnie Mouse."

Not sure if want.

Haha, that artist is funny. Just look at this◊; Only Six Faces doesn't come close.

EDIT: Or at least, I think that's the same artist. I found it on the Japanese site kotaku linked to.

edited 11th Jul '11 6:18:48 PM by Sabbo

The artist also did Shuffle.

I can tell. Every single one of those girls looks like Kaede. :P

Seriously, when I read this, my first thought was Princess Aurora in the style of Nerine Forbessi.

And just today I saw the Tinkerbell picture on Danbooru...

It seems quite weird that Disney does that, but I wonder who exactly decided that. Erotic art doesn't have such a big stigma in Japan as in the west, Bleached Underpants is not unusual there. If it was the Japanese branch of Disney who made deal, instead of the higher-ups in the US, than it wouldn't so surprising.

I think the picture's fine. At least it doesn't look like Kaede.