Toy Story 4

Just throwing this out there, I recall a lot of people complaining about 3 before it came out because they felt 2 was the perfect ending...

Tom Hanks just really, really wants to be Woody again. Probably because he has grandchildren now and he'd like to have more movies he could use to brag to them.

edited 30th Jun '11 10:38:11 AM by nabaduco

I dont know...

Honestly, I am normally OK with the sequels and dont hate them simply and solely BECAUSE they are sequels...

But, wow. I mean, they had to wati around, what, 8 years or so for 3 to be created (And it was in purpose)... Not sure.

John Lasseter reacts.

Well that doesn't really tell us anything, but I'm glad he is aware of the rumours at least.

Sounds to me like he's trying to dodge giving a straight answer. I think we're on to something!

Pixar isn't like Dream Works and announces movies before any work begins (we're still waiting on Truckers and Boo U., which were announced in 2009 but have been forgotten). The "no comment" answer is probably because they haven't thought that far in the future.

edited 19th Jul '11 12:56:41 PM by Buscemi

I have gotten some contact with a friend of mine who works at Pixar(I'm NOT giving the name). But this person did tell me about Toy story 4, and it didn't sound like the person thought it was a good idea. The person mentioned to me that everyone dislikes how the story is going.

oh lord not this again

...

I.

Will kill.

To-day.

So now we know; the world isn't gonna end in 2012. It's gonna end on the day this gets released!

Stop lying...

Oh Jesus here we go again.

I call bull for now (Only because I refuse to believe that there would be a Toy Story 4) and only until Pixar confirms such an absurd project will I start going crazy.

Just throwing this out there, I recall a lot of people complaining about 3 before it came out because they felt 2 was the perfect ending...

Except that even the makers realized that it wasn't. Woody could say he's fine with living his life until Andy outgrows him, but what would he do when it really came to that? That's what Toy Story 3 gave us and it ended with the toys not being Andys' anymore. I don't think we really need to see how they're going to live as Bonnie's toys now 'cause that was a good enough way to end the story. Which is why Toy Story 4 would be a worse mistake than Cars 2 on Pixar's part. Thankfully, I don't think they'll do it.

edited 26th Aug '11 6:50:49 PM by ManwiththePlan

That's why Toy Story 4 needs to be about Sid!

In all honesty regarding on TS 4 I don't think it will happen. Besides being a noticeable cash grab the 3rd pretty much showed it was The End.

Could they possibly make one that's set in the same universe but doesn't focus on the original toys? That's the only way I can see this working.

But wouldn't that be a In Name Only?

edited 26th Aug '11 7:23:44 PM by Theoriginalblader

It's a story about toys but nothing says the story has to be about the same toys all the time.

I get that, but people who want a 4th are likely to expect Woody and Buzz to be in it.

People want a fourth? I thought the general consensus was that the third should be the end.

It varies, I'll leave it at that.

Make it about Buttercup and Mr. Pricklepants.

They should totally make a mockery of the whole thing, if Disney is forcing them to make another movie to sell crap. Go out in a blaze of rebellious, neo Dada-ist nonsense.

I'm still with the people (majority?) who think that this should. Not. Be. Made.

The endings of Toy Story 1 and 2 just finished their own films. The ending of Toy Story 3 finished the WHOLE FRANCHISE. Part of its goodness was due to how it was such a good ending; no matter what, this would be removed if there was a fourth one. It would... Disturb the balance, or something.