These are what we call the 'YMMV items.' Things that some people find in this work. We call them 'your mileage might vary' because not everyone sees these things in the same way. This starts discussions in the trope lists, a thing we don't want. Please use the discussion page if you'd like to discuss any of these items.
Author's Saving Throw: Martian Manhunter told off his Stormwatch teammates for referring to him as a Justice League member, which is apparently shorthand for "established superhero", despite the fact that the Justice League has never had more than seven members (until JLI). So, any author wants to refer to, say, Metamorpho or Green Arrow as "Justice League heroes", that's what it refers to.
The Culling did not go over well at all, namely because of the many deaths especially Artemis's, and the finale of Ravagers had them all recaptured. This trope goes into effect when the finale of the first run of Teen Titans reveals that all the teenagers killed in the Culling was revived and their powers taken away so they could be normal again (though the author was unable to get Ridge's real name right).
Broken Base/Internet Backdraft: The reboot in general was very controversial when it was announced, and even three years after it happened opinion was divided and discussions could get very heated about certain aspects of it. Overall, some fans consider it an interesting and fresh new take on the universe, while others consider it the return of some of the worst tropes from The Dark Age of Comic Books.
Superman is introduced as a more angry brooding figure considerably more violent than before, being willing to throw defenseless white collar criminals out of windows and dangle them off ledges, mocking the police in his early twenties and choke slamming Batman in their first encounter. In many ways, this is a return to his early, rougher characterization in The Golden Age of Comic Books (see the image for Wife-Basher Basher), but people are too used to him being anIdeal Hero at this point.
And of course, the Executive Meddling is still going strong. Some fans are upset that the comics appear to be even more editorial driven than before the reboot.
The disappearance of long time fan favorites such as Wally West (the third Flash - along with his wife and kids), Cassandra Cain (Batgirl II/Black Bat), and Stephanie Brown (Spoiler/Robin/Batgirl III/etc.) among others while supposedly "inferior" or less beloved characters such as Bart Allen remain has not sat well with many fans.
Reaction to Villains Month was, for the most part, lukewarm at best. Grievances range from normal issues of the entire line of books being put on hold for a month, to the stories being boring and/or uninspired, to the 3D covers being an excessive gimmick no one particularly wanted and unnecessarily driving up cost.
Also the decision to update the Justice League's roster, first by removing Firestorm and Element Woman after they barely did anything since joining the team, the addition of Shazam (with fans preferring he and his foster family get their own book), and most of all, removing The Flash and Superman and replacing them with Captain Cold and Lex Luthor respectively.
The Future's End crossover event not only showcasing a pair of even moreDarker and Edgier futures, each much worse than the last, but the pretty high possibility that they are set in stone, which makes all the events and victories you see on the universe's "present time" even more heartbreaking. And some would say "worthless".
Convergence: The possible rebirth of the pre-Flashpoint DC Universe, the possible last hurrah of the pre-Flashpoint DC Universe, or just one more possible Player Punch from DC to those who are vocal about wanting the clock to be turned back in order to make it understood that the New 52 is here to stay and they better deal with it? Doesn't really helps that it's being advertised as a "last universe standing" kind of Crisis Crossover event.
One comic book critic flat out said, "Dan DiDio is the worst thing to happen to DC Comics in the history of the company", and in response a lot of fans have not only vocally agreed with this assessment, they've publicly posted in various social media that as long as "that man" is involved in DC, and until "DC stops shitting where they eat", they will not be giving DC comics any more of their money.
Continuity Lockout: With the near-constant Bat Family Crossover flow of the various Green Lantern comics from in the very least the beginning through "Godhead", it has become increasingly difficult to recommend the series to newcomers. Although this wasalreadythe case before, the common crossovers have become unending, especially with "Green Lantern" and "Green Lantern Corps", which some think may as well not be separate books at all for the amount of interconnecting they have.
"The Pearl" (which ended with Damian's death and members of the Bat Family mourning him-plus Batman getting another Wangst period during which he gave the most violent Never Be a Hero speech to someone ever).
Supergirl, having been a Plucky Girl pre-reboot, now has enough angst to give Spider-Man a run for his money (and enough anger to become a Red Lantern). You can count the number of times she smiles on one hand.
The Blue Lantern Corps (which is powered by and represents hope) being wiped out.
Future's End: All of the victories of the heroes, all of their happiness, all of those beloved characters, will be killed and turned worthless and the triggers are coming ever-so-inexorably closer...
Ensemble Darkhorse: Despite how divided the fandom is with the whole reboot in general, some characters are quite well liked for their interesting characterizations and potential for stories, such as Aquaman, Strix from Birds of Prey, and Billy Batson's five foster siblings.
A common gripe with the New 52 is that despite a large number of changes, the Continuity Lock-Out that was typical for the old DCU did not disappear, and many characters (such as Green Lanterns) still require extensive knowledge of their old DCU stories to understand what is going on, instead of having a fresh start. What makes things even more confusing is that many older fans who would be otherwise immune to Continuity Lockout are confused as well, due to the fact that whatever continuity that has been retained has been very hazily defined. For example, according to the new "superheroes debuted five years ago" compressed timeline, Batman started his career and took on all four male Robins within six years. In the end, all that its accomplished is make it so everyone, even long time fans, are confused by what's going on.
Earth 2 has received this kind of complaint, since it eventually turned from a different team of superheroes similar to those from Justice Society of America fighting against the onslaughts of new villains and a different member of the forces of Darkseid to Batman's team vs. Superman's team.
The same can be said of the practice as of July 2014 to re-relaunch cancelled series under new creative teams, when one of the points made in the New 52 is that there are only 52 running books at once, taking space from newer ideas in an attempt to reboot a reboot.
There's been a recent phenomena of what's referred to as 'House Style', where creative teams tend to make each book look and feel almost identical. Artwork tends to be similar to Jim Lee's art, with the colourists using the same techniques, and writers sticking to writing and characterizing the heroes in a similar True Art Is Angsty way; because of this, many feel that the bulk of the line-up isn't really bad, just boring because they all feel generic. The few books that succeed to escape this 'House Style', either by unique artwork, creative writing, or some combination, tend to get more interest online for actually being different.
Tainted By The First Issue: Since DC released fifty-two first issues in one month, even people willing to buy all fifty-two #1s were unlikely to give anything they didn't like a second chance. (How many #2s are you going to buy of comics you already have a bad impression of? When there might be dozens of them?) Ergo, any writer who put something controversial in the first issue, expecting readers to stick around for justification in later issues, was making a grave mistake. Several of the series died due to their first issue not being as good as later ones.
However, the "add something controversial to hook in fans" thing was a double edged sword. Catwoman and Red Hood and the Outlaws drew in massive amounts of outcry and drama over scenes of sexualization (Catwoman having rough sex with a hesitant Batman, Starfire in some cheesecake poses and having sex with Roy Harper with the then perceived notion that she couldn't tell humans apart). How the writers responded to the allegations of angered fans differed: Judd Winick didn't really do much to defend himself and was replaced rather quickly, while Scott Lobdell openly responded to fans and lasted much longer on his book.
Superman was reintroduced as a man who in his early twenties was violent towards non powered criminals, openly mocking the police as he ran from them and a few years later in the timeline, choke slams Batman in a fight when he already knew nothing in Batman's arsenal could hurt him. Even the more grown up version introduced in issue one of a parallel series was shown to be a more angry brooding figure than Superman had ever been.
One of the reasons for this reaction was that quite a few titles suffered from an Aborted Arc in their cancellations - although most of them wrapped up fairly smoothly, there was still a small forest of dangling plot threads left behind, presumably now never to be resolved.
One of the most controversial examples of this in fandom is giving The Phantom Stranger a definitive origin.
The final issue of the first run of Teen Titans reveals Artemis and every other teen murdered during, before and after the events of the Culling were revived and had their powers (if they had any) removed. That being said, Artemis has not been seen since anyway.