Follow TV Tropes

Following

Off On A Technicality / Live-Action TV

Go To

Times where a criminal gets Off on a Technicality in Live-Action TV series.


  • Adam-12 and Dragnet: Both Jack Webb-produced series featured Courtroom Episodes where suspects had charges dropped on various technicalities – key witnesses fail to show, obtaining evidence without a search warrant... the list goes on. One such case from Adam-12 had Reed's accidental discovery of drug manufacturing equipment in a suspect's home when he went to check if the back door was locked (he and Malloy were arresting him on an unrelated traffic warrant) be ruled an illegal search.
  • All in the Family. One episode has two examples; the judge states the episode's Aesop that despite the justice system not being perfect and sometimes letting criminals go free, it ensures that everyone's rights are respected.
    • Archie Bunker is on trial after a policeman Archie called to report a mugging found a can of tear gas in Archie's home despite the latter not having the necessary license. Archie told the cop that he had the tear gas sprayer and had gotten it "out of a magazine" (i.e. without getting a license for it), but the cop found it by searching the pockets of Archie's coat without permission, making it inadmissible as evidence, since the container was not in plain sight. The judge dismissed the case.
    • During the trial, Archie asks what happened to the criminal who originally mugged him and the judge replies he was released due to him having had his Miranda rights read to him in English despite him not being a native English speaker. Gloria is then shocked at the thought of the criminal being released and her innocent father being jailed... until the discussion brings to light the fact that the officer who found the tear gas didn't have a warrant, which causes the case to be dismissed. note 
  • In the Angel episode "Conviction", the gang actually deliberately sought this once for an obviously guilty human trafficker, as he threatened to mystically release a virus that would wipe out California if convicted. They succeeded by giving Gunn a large brain zap of legal information, allowing him to discover a potential conflict of interest involving the judge on the case, forcing a mistrial.
  • Babylon 5: Legally gray/grey tactics are used for political and/or personal reasons.
    • In "Point of No Return", Sheridan uses a 'chain of command' irregularity (The orders had been sent out by the Political Office, which didn't have the legal authority to issue them. Ivanova points out that the President would likely issue a new set from his own office - which did have the authority to make said orders - within the week) to prevent Nightwatch taking over the station, as had been ordered by President Clark when he seized absolute power. They certainly consider Sheridan to be a criminal getting off on a technicality.
  • In the live-action Batman (1966) series, Batman was a deputy and sometimes even acted as a prosecutor. Despite this, no enemy of his ever tried to convince the judge to dismiss evidence that only came into light because of Batman breaking into places without a search warrant (that would be admissible if he wasn't a deputized police officer, ironically) or tried to get Batman disqualified as prosecutor. Is "Batman" licensed to practice law in whatever state Gotham is located?
  • Blindspotting: Miles is freed in "Return to Ithica" because it was found that the cops who arrested him planted evidence, tainting his conviction, though he'd genuinely been holding drugs at the time.
  • Blue Bloods:
  • Bosch: The titular Bosch and his partner Edgar were able to prove that Johnny Stokes indeed killed the young Delacroix boy back in 1994. However, Stokes was also just a boy at the time, when Los Angeles County did not prosecute minors for murder as adults. The law started allowing such prosecutions in 2000. The maximum time he would serve was the 48 hours in holding.
  • On the The Closer episode "You Have the Right to Remain Jolly'", "Santa" starts confessing things before Flynn has the chance to Mirandize him, and they're afraid this might happen. Luckily, he's had a lot of egg-nog and ends up passing out and hitting his head on a table, so when he's sobered up a bit, they can read him his rights then and talk to him again. And also, he didn't do it.
  • Community: Played for Laughs in "Basic Lupine Urology" when Troy and Abed complain that their best suspect for the murder of their yam is getting off on a technicality—the technicality in question being that they are not cops and have no ability to arrest him.
  • Invoked in an episode of Bull. A woman charged with possession staunchly defends her drug-dealer brother...but eventually comes to realize that he really IS a drug dealer, and is willing to let her take the fall for drugs he'd stored on her property. She's ready to testify against him, but would likely die before getting into Witness Protection; so Dr. Bull orchestrates a way out for her. With the cooperation of the prosecutor and the judge, the former submits his final piece of evidence — the lab report verifying the contraband — and rests his case. But then the defendant's attorney — who isn't in on the plan — finds what they want her to see: the final page of the report hadn't been notarized. And since the feds had already rested their case, the mistake couldn't be fixed...so the report was inadmissible, the case collapsed, and her brother thinks she simply got lucky. But a few minutes later, they slap the cuffs on him — and it's safe for his sister to sing.
  • Judge Nicholas Marshall, the protagonist of Dark Justice, became a vigilante when his wife and his daughter were murdered and their killer got off on a technicality.
  • Dexter often hunts down killers who got off on a technicality, along with killers released from jail and ones the police never tracked down.
  • The Escape Artist: Played straight but seriously - Foyle is released due to this trope, but not because of any nefarious, underhanded tactic by Will, but instead due to the Trial Judge's initial refusal to give Will's expert time to prepare his submissions. When this later becomes quite critical to the case, coupled with the leaking of details, the Judge accepts that Foyle cannot get a fair trial and is forced to stay the indictment. Maggie also does the same thing when Foyle is charged with murdering Kate.
  • In an episode of Frasier, Martin tells Frasier about an incident where he was arresting a man with a long criminal record, and was attacked while reading him his rights, meaning that they weren't read in full. Martin says that when it came time to testify in court whether the man had his rights read in full, Martin lied that they were so he wouldn't get off on a technicality. He justifies it with the fact that the man had been arrested so many times that "he could have read me my rights" and that it was the right thing to do (since the man was a violent criminal). This misrepresents the nature of the Miranda warning: the man assaulted a police officer, and the officer (just like anybody else) is legally perfectly able to testify about a crime if he's the victim, whether the suspect was Mirandized or not. Plus, the arrestee interrupting his Miranda rights by assaulting the reader and attempting to escape makes it his fault if they weren't read correctly. On top of everything else, Martin says he "saw him shoot someone." Miranda Rights or not, he can testify and convict the guy, except maybe if there were a confession involved—only then if they weren't read before that would it be excluded.
  • The Good Wife puts a twist on the concept because, as a realistic Law Procedural, technicalities are sought by the protagonists as often as by the villains. In a season 2 episode she stops the state from introducing the murder weapon as a new piece of evidence by immediately resting her case, then gets her client a plea deal for five years and convinces him to take it because if the jury deadlocks, a mistrial means the murder weapon is admissible and he probably goes down for murder one.
  • The ABC series Hardcastle and McCormick featured a retired judge (Brian Keith) who set out to bring down criminals who were released on technicalities.
    • From the judge's own court—even though it is the judge himself who rules on such technicalities. While it could be argued that the judge was strictly following the letter of the law despite his personal misgivings, and/or the convictions were overturned on appeal, that's not what the show's Opening Narration implies.
  • Hill Street Blues had this come up regularly. On one occasion a murder trial nearly collapsed because the impound lot where a search of a seized car had lost its contract with the police department mere hours earlier, which meant that chain of evidence regs were technically violated for the murder weapon; fortunately the judge ruled it admissible despite this oversight. Another time a man on trial for rape had the charges dismissed because he claimed he didn't speak English and couldn't understand the officer giving out his Miranda Rights, and a sting operation had to be set up with an officer wearing a wire in order to prove he'd lied so that a retrial could go forward.
  • In the final episode of Homicide: Life on the Street, Bayliss discovers that Luke Ryland, a child molester he'd arrested earlier in the series, had been released because court backlogs had delayed his trial so long that the case was thrown out (on the basis that you couldn't just detain someone indefinitely without trial). At the end of the episode, Bayliss quietly packs up his desk and leaves the department, just as two of the other detectives discover the body of Ryland.
  • A whole episode of the old cop show Hunter was based on this, when a group of kids spontaneously confessed to killing a girl at a party, before the cops even had a chance to read them their rights. This sparked a vigilante-kills-the-killers plot. In Real Life, the technicality wouldn't have applied in the case of a spontaneous confession, and the police could then investigate to find other evidence that would support this.
  • In the Dark: After the trouble which Murphy goes to getting Dean's confession recorded on her phone, it can't be used because in Illinois recordings required both parties' consent. On top of all that, the police captain agrees to have the evidence destroyed rather than reveal it so he'd at least be fired and publicly excoriated, as he's still useful plus he would make the guy look bad as his superior.
  • Justified:
    • Boyd is released from jail after Raylan enters a sexual relationship with Ava, tainting her as a witness in the shootout between the two.
    • After it's revealed that Sheriff Hunter Mosley is dirty, all the cases he was involved in need to be retried. The decision is made to just release any inmates with less than six months remaining on their sentences, freeing Bo Crowder.
    • In his backstory in Justified: City Primeval, Clement Mansell killed several drug dealers and nearly killed another, but this one managed to survive. They had him pretty much dead to rights, but his attorney, Carolyn Wilder, got him off on something called a "Federal detainer statute." Exactly how this worked is never explained in any fashion.
  • Law & Order, as noted in the trope description, generally subverts this by the end of the episode or compensates with extreme prejudice. However, there are a few exceptions:
    • "Juvenile": A suspect cannot be tried as an adult because the murder took place before the law allowing minors to be tried as adults was passed and she's way too old to be tried in Family Court.
    • Just as frequently, L&O would invert the trope; getting damning evidence in under technicalities. One example would be a letter written by the psychiatrist of the defendant to the victim warning her of danger was ruled inadmissible due to Spousal Privilege (as the psychiatrist was counseling both as husband and wife). But since they were legally separated at the time, Jack McCoy was able to argue that spousal privilege was void, making the wife a third party to the sessions, thus voiding doctor-patient privilege, thus letting the letter back in and nailing the defendant.
      • In another episode, he's able to bring a priest up on sexual abuse charges for crimes that were technically well past the statute of limitations, by arguing that his attempt to bribe a cop (who was one of his former victims) to keep his mouth shut constituted a perpetuation of his crimes and therefore reset the statute. In fact, the major court arc in that episode is the arguments over whether the statute should apply or not; as soon as he realizes it's going to go through, the priest pleads out.
  • Law & Order: Special Victims Unit has a few:
    • A sexsomniac mistook his fiancee's sister for his fiancee while "sleepwalking" and the DA can't charge him with rape because he wasn't conscious of what he was doing and he regularly had consensual sex with his fiancee in his unconscious state.
    • An alcoholic blacked out to find he'd killed the woman he had a one night stand with. The DA bungles the case, first by accidentally showing a reconstructed video of the crime with his face tacked on instead of the video with the faceless model, then by showing up drunk to the hearing to determine if the case should be thrown out on her misconduct. She has to suffer through having the drunk test performed on her in the courtroom and fails, which results in her dismissal and sanctions and the case dismissed with prejudice.
    • A murderous schizophrenic nutcase got his case thrown out after the overenthusiastic lab tech Dale Stuckey mis-labeled his DNA sample. He's rearrested later on suspicion of other murders, but the episode's plot takes a sudden turn (in which Stuckey turns out to be behind the murders) towards the end, so it's never established what ultimately happened to the schizophrenic man — though given that he unquestionably tried to kill two cops, both of whom can attest that it was him and that he indicated his intention to kill, he's probably not walking away a free man. At best, he might get off on an Insanity Defense and be put in a hospital instead of prison, which would probably be a good thing for everyone involved.
    • One episode had Novak and a judge actually join forces with a defense attorney to pull off a version of this. Earlier in the episode, Novak and the defense attorney had negotiated a plea bargain for a teenager who killed his mother's murderer, only for the victim's relatives (backed by a lobbyist group) to sue in civil court to block the deal, which could set a very problematic precedent. So how do they solve it? When the opposing attorney in the case calls the criminal defendant as a witness, Novak and the judge persuade the defense attorney to let him testify in the civil case, knowing that in order to make his point, the plaintiff's lawyer will have to badger the boy into talking about the shooting. As soon as he does, the defense attorney appeals to the criminal judge for a mistrial, based on the fact that the defendant has just been compelled to incriminate himself in court, thus violating his Fifth Amendment rights. The criminal judge agrees and declares the case dismissed with prejudice (meaning he can't be re-tried on those charges). Casey immediately uses this as a basis to argue for the dismissal of the civil case, since there is no longer anything to fight over. The civil court judge agrees and dismisses the case.
    • A case of a Karma Houdini occurred when a character who committed an outstandingly heinous (even for this show!) double murder, during which he buried a baby alive, got off because before he confessed and led the detectives to the corpses while waiving his right to counsel, he mentioned that he had an upcoming burglary case. Because the mention of the burglary case was an offhanded comment in the middle of a conversation, and the suspect didn't draw any attention to it, the detectives didn't pay it any mind, and he later argued that having mentioned his lawyer, even in the offhand way he did, constituted asking for a lawyer, so any further questioning and the responses elicited would be inadmissible — and the judge agreed. Unlike the other examples from SVU, this was a deliberate plan by the suspect rather than a bit of good luck for the defendant or the detectives grasping the Idiot Ball.
  • In Lois & Clark: Lord Kal-El became the ruler of New Krypton to prevent Lord Nor from doing so. Lord Nor charged Kal-El with treason and a Kangaroo Court held under Kryptonian Law sentenced him to death. Right after Kal-El is led off, a Kryptonian bursts in and tells Nor that Metropolis refuses to surrender. Nor responds by vaporizing him with heat vision and ordering his men to destroy Metropolis. All of that is done in front of the chief prosecutor, leading him to a massive Heroic BSoD. Then, another person comes to the prosecutor and points out the technicality - Kal-El was never informed of the Trial by Combat law. Guess whose side the prosecutor takes...
  • The second season of Luke Cage (2016) reveals that Rafael Scarfe's corruption tainted at best nearly every arrest he was involved with, resulting in criminals being released from prison because Scarfe planted something incriminating. We follow one criminal who was released, Dontrell "Cockroach" Hamilton, but it's revealed that as many as thirty other cases were voided because of Scarfe.
  • Major Crimes has a five-episode series, "Hindsight", revolving around the Rev. Daniel Price. He's nicknamed "Reverend Cop Killer" by the LAPD after, years ago, a murder case for killing an off-duty cop during an armed robbery was dismissed with prejudice because one of the investigating officers perjured himself on the stand. In the present day he paints himself as The Atoner but the police suspect his church is the center of a drug ring. Turns out his Heel–Face Turn is genuine: he became a pastor to deal with his guilt over the murder and keep other young black men out of gangs, but his younger brother was running drugs through his church without his knowledge.
  • On The Mentalist, there was an episode featuring a man who was accused of murdering his wife and only wasn't convicted because a videotape proving that he lied about not being at the crime scene when it happened was ruled inadmissible for not being presented on time. It was revealed later that the man was really innocent and that the real murderer doctored the tape to frame the victim's husband.
    • It is later revealed that a number of criminals caught by the team were later released because the evidence against them was deemed tainted due to Jane's antics during the investigations.
  • Murder in the First: Ivana confesses in full to her crimes, but it can't be used against her as she asked for a lawyer, who hasn't come yet.
  • Played with in an episode of NCIS. A sailor is charged with the murder of a prostitute in Baltimore, but the case is thrown out due to an improperly-written warrant. Everyone the sailor knows — including his wife — is convinced he's guilty; so he approaches Gibbs about re-opening his case...saying he's even willing to stand court-martial in an effort to clear his name. While he wasn't as blameless as he claimed, the culprit turns out to be the District Attorney, who killed the hooker and then deliberately botched the warrant to keep the case from being examined too closely. In another episode, Gibbs deliberately botched an arrest with a lawyer standing in the next room so that he wouldn't be forced to prosecute his mother-in-law for murder.
  • Inverted in NCIS: Los Angeles, where a technicality is used to nail the perpetrator. In this case, the guilty party (a civilian) had murdered a marine on patrol at the Mexican border, having lured him over the border line so the crime wasn't committed on US soil and he can't be charged there. He admits to all this under interrogation, pointing out NCIS now have nothing to charge him with and no right to detain him. G thanks him for his cooperation and points out that since the perp knowingly attacked an on-duty marine, he's now an enemy combatant. Instead of the legal system with its rights and pre-hearings, he gets to be detained indefinitely as a POW in a military prison, and tried by a military court, and this interview is absolutely admissible as evidence. The perp panics and tried to backpedal, only for G to declare the interrogation complete and wish him luck.
  • In an episode of The Practice, a man was found with his wife's body in the trunk of his car. However, because the female cop in question was unable to give a reason to search the car's trunk, the search was ruled inadmissible, and the body (and all the evidence on it) was ruled to be fruit of the poisonous tree. However, it turns out that the cop and the man had planned the improper search between them; they'd been having a relationship for some time. The "vigilante justice" aspect happens when the man's lawyer finds out about it, and "accidentally" lets it slip to the ADA, who happens to live in the same apartment as his partner. Since he gets the answering machine, and presumably knew his partner wasn't home and the ADA was...
    • In one episode, Lindsey uses a botched search to argue for the release of a nun-killer. She gets him off, but feels awful about it.
  • One episode of The Rockford Files featured Jim getting out of jail on a contempt of court charge due to issues with the subpoena that was used to get him to testify in the case where the charges occurred. It listed the wrong middle initial.
  • In The Sopranos episode "Employee of the Month", after Dr. Melfi is raped, her rapist is immediately arrested and then set free on a technicality. In the end, the doctor chooses to allow him to remain a Karma Houdini rather than call in some Soprano Justice.
  • The Cold Opening of an episode of Spooks has a radical Muslim cleric get acquitted of unspecified terrorism charges after the judge rules MI-5's wiretap evidence inadmissible. However, the cleric is then dramatically shot dead outside the courthouse by a Christian terrorist, leading into the episode's actual plot.
  • Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: In "Dax", the crew foil a so-called extradition attempt by the Klaestrons against Jadzia Dax by pointing out that, despite being operated by the Federation, Deep Space 9 is legally Bajoran soil. The Klaestrons therefore must argue for extradition in a Bajoran court rather than relying on their extradition treaty with the Federation (which permits them to act unilaterally, raising questions about the competence of Federation diplomats), which buys Odo the time he needs to find evidence exonerating Dax's previous host Curzon.
    • In a sense, this also happens with the (initially very central) question of whether a Trill can be held responsible for the actions of a past host. Because Curzon was proved innocent, the question becomes irrelevant, so no ruling is given on the matter.
  • In the Starsky & Hutch episode "Bust Amboy," the protagonists arrest the drug lord Amboy and seize thousands of dollars in drug money, only to find that their warrant was invalid because they crossed a county line in the preceding Car Chase.
  • In the first episode of Tales from the Crypt, "The Man Who Was Death", one murderer gets off free because the arrest warrant was improperly signed, leading the protagonist to later hunt him down and electrocute him to make sure he doesn't escape punishment.
  • Episode 35 of Tokusou Sentai Dekaranger features this as part of the backstory. The daughter of a Special Police detective was shot and killed several years ago. There were three suspects, but since they were unable to determine which of them fired the gun, the three were let go. This prompts the aforementioned detective to steal said gun from the evidence storage and use it to kill his daughter's murderers with his own hands.
  • Mr. Chapel in Vengeance Unlimited often hunts down killers who got off on a technicality, along with killers released from jail and ones the police never tracked down, but his net is wider, he doesn't kill his target, and he only does it for a million... or a favor.
  • An episode of Walker, Texas Ranger had three cops giving Vigilante Executions to criminals they feel didn't get the punishment they deserved. Their downfall begins when they kill a kid who was actually innocent; DNA evidence exonerated him, but the cops never checked.
  • Wiseguy: This happens to a case Santana is prosecuting in his introductory episode, "Fruit of the Poisoned Tree", evidence gained from an illegal search is suppressed, and the case collapses.


Top