Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AshcanCopy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This was parodied in ''Series/ArrestedDevelopment'', where it's stated to be one of several movies made by Imagine Entertainment ([[SelfDeprecation the studio that makes the show]]) for just such a reason: the actors were the people working the bar when Ron Howard was told their contract was expiring, and they were also hired to work at the wrap party.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SamRaimi and friends had ''Within the Woods'', a short film that was a prototype of ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' made to convince his townsfolk to finance the project.

to:

* SamRaimi Creator/SamRaimi and friends had ''Within the Woods'', a short film that was a prototype of ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' made to convince his townsfolk to finance the project.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one. Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k
* ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.

to:

* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one. Watch it here: http://www.It only exists in bootleg copies - including [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k
com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k online ones]].
* ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' has SamRaimi and friends had ''Within the Woods'', a short film Within the Woods, that was a cut down prototype of ''The Franchise/EvilDead'' made to convince filmmakers his townsfolk to finance the project.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''The EvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of ''The EvilDead'' made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.

to:

* ''The EvilDead'' Franchise/EvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of ''The EvilDead'' Franchise/EvilDead'' made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[AC:Video Games]]
* Japan had a law prohibiting arcade cabinets from being distributed without games. Manufacturers obliged by providing very simple games good for little else but testing the monitors and controls. Creator/{{Sega}}'s ''Dottori-kun'' and Creator/{{Taito}}'s ''Minivader'' are typical examples, featuring primitive black-and-white graphics and no sound.

Added: 1098

Changed: 646

Removed: 487

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Description rewritten to make this less medium-specific; example categorization


A term that originated from TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks. There was a big rush to copyright as many characters and titles as possible, but the actual production time of a comic book made it a bit problematic when days or even hours mattered. The solution? Create a simple mock comic, often just a cover and some unrelated filler made up of garbage sheets, and submit it to the copyright office. The term itself comes from the fact that these comics weren't ever actually made to be distributed, often just going straight to the ashcan (period vernacular for trashcan) once they did their job.

to:

A cheaply and quickly produced work, not intended to be shown to the masses and disseminated only to the extent required to fulfill some non-artistic obligation like claiming a trademark.

The
term that originated from TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks. There in TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks, when there was a big rush to copyright as many characters and titles as possible, but the actual production time of a comic book made it a bit problematic when days or even hours mattered. The solution? Create a simple mock comic, often just a cover and some unrelated filler made up of garbage sheets, and submit it to the copyright office. The term itself comes from the fact that these comics weren't ever actually made to be distributed, often just going straight to the ashcan (period vernacular for trashcan) once they did their job.



!!Examples of titles that had their origin in Ashcan situations:

to:

!!Examples of titles that had their origin in Ashcan situations:
!!Examples:

[[AC:ComicBooks]]



* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one. Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k


Added DiffLines:


[[AC:{{Film}}]]
* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one. Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Producer Bill Snyder bought the rights to make a film from J.R.R. Tolkien's estate on the cheap, and just before it was set to expire the popularity of Tolkien's ''LordOfTheRings'' books skyrocketed. Realizing he could make serious cash selling the rights, he decided to get it extended. However a film had to be made and released in order for that to happen. With the contract set to expire in one month, he got Gene Deitch to hastily produce a 12 minute film using still drawings and got it finished in 30 days, which was then screened in a Manhattan theater on the day the contract expired. The deal being fulfilled, the contract was extended and Snyder sold the rights for $100,000 (in 1960s money). In 2012 the film finally resurfaced when Snyder's son [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src uploaded it on YouTube]].
----

to:

* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' ''Literature/TheHobbit'' was this. Producer Bill Snyder bought the rights to make a film from J.R.R. Tolkien's estate on the cheap, and just before it was set to expire the popularity of Tolkien's ''LordOfTheRings'' books skyrocketed. Realizing he could make serious cash selling the rights, he decided to get it extended. However a film had to be made and released in order for that to happen. With the contract set to expire in one month, he got Gene Deitch to hastily produce a 12 minute film using still drawings and got it finished in 30 days, which was then screened in a Manhattan theater on the day the contract expired. The deal being fulfilled, the contract was extended and Snyder sold the rights for $100,000 (in 1960s money). In 2012 the film finally resurfaced when Snyder's son [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src uploaded it on YouTube]].
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Arguable, and doesn\'t really fit this trope


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''The Amazing Spider-Man'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].



<<|ComicBookTropes|>>
<<|MetaConcepts|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Eerie"

to:

* "Eerie"''Eerie'' #1 was a hastily assembled digest of horror comic stories with a print run of a few hundred copies, created by publisher James Warren to deny the title to rival publishers Myron Fass and Robert W. Farrell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The most widely-known example is ''Flash Comics'', the title that introduced [[{{Shazam}} Captain Marvel]] (then called Captain Thunder). ''Whiz Comics'' #2 was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.

to:

* The most widely-known example is ''Flash Comics'', which was actually the title that introduced of two different ashcans from different companies seeking claim to the title. Creator/DCComics' ''Flash Comics'' combined cover art from ''Adventure Comics'' #41 with pages from ''All-American Comics'' #8; Fawcett's ''Flash Comics'' (also printed under the title ''Thrill Comics'') featured the origin of Captain Thunder, who made his first regular appearance as [[{{Shazam}} Captain Marvel]] (then called Captain Thunder). in ''Whiz Comics'' #2 (there was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.no ''Whiz Comics'' #1).



* "5-Cent Comics"

to:

* "5-Cent Comics"Fawcett's ''5-Cent Comics'' and ''Nickel Comics'' ashcans marked the respective debuts of Dan Dare and Scoop Smith, both of whom subsequently appeared in ''Whiz Comics''. ''Nickel Comics'' became a regular series, but without Scoop Smith.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one.

to:

* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one. Watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coayT3aUn8k
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''{{The Amazing Spider-Man}}'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].

to:

* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''{{The ''The Amazing Spider-Man}}'' Spider-Man'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the '{The Amazing Spider-Man}'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].

to:

* Some people have accused Sony of making the '{The ''{{The Amazing Spider-Man}'' Spider-Man}}'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''TheAmazingSpider-man'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].

to:

* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''TheAmazingSpider-man'' '{The Amazing Spider-Man}'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''TheAmazingSpiderman'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].

to:

* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''TheAmazingSpiderman'' ''TheAmazingSpider-man'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''[[Film/TheAmazingSpider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man]]'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].

to:

* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''[[Film/TheAmazingSpider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man]]'' ''TheAmazingSpiderman'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Some people have accused Sony of making the ''[[Film/TheAmazingSpider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man]]'' reboot so soon after the end of the Raimi series due to wanting to keep the cinematic rights to Spider-Man away from [[MarvelCinematicUniverse Marvel Studios]].



<<|MetaConcepts|>>

to:

<<|MetaConcepts|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Producer Bill Snyder bought the rights to make a film from J.R.R. Tolkien's estate on the cheap, and just before it was set to expire the popularity of Tolkien's ''LordOfTheRings'' books skyrocketed. Realizing he could make serious cash selling the rights, he decided to get it extended. However a film had to be made and released in order for that to happen. With the contract set to expire in one month, he got Gene Deitch to hastily produce a 12 minute film using still drawings and got it finished in 30 days, which was then screened in a Manhattan theater on the day the contract expired. The deal being fulfilled, the rights was extended and Snyder sold the rights for $100,000 (in 1960s money). In 2012 the film finally resurfaced when Snyder's son [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src uploaded it on YouTube]].

to:

* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Producer Bill Snyder bought the rights to make a film from J.R.R. Tolkien's estate on the cheap, and just before it was set to expire the popularity of Tolkien's ''LordOfTheRings'' books skyrocketed. Realizing he could make serious cash selling the rights, he decided to get it extended. However a film had to be made and released in order for that to happen. With the contract set to expire in one month, he got Gene Deitch to hastily produce a 12 minute film using still drawings and got it finished in 30 days, which was then screened in a Manhattan theater on the day the contract expired. The deal being fulfilled, the rights contract was extended and Snyder sold the rights for $100,000 (in 1960s money). In 2012 the film finally resurfaced when Snyder's son [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src uploaded it on YouTube]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Long story short, a producer named Bill Snyder bought the rights to make an animated feature film based on the book. A script was written, but he wanted too much money, and thus it was never picked up and all was forgotten. However, just as the rights was about to expire the value of film rights for Tolkien's stories skyrocketed. Snyder decided to make a quick buck selling the rights, but he had to actually make a film and have it screened in public. Thus he had Gene Deitch (yes, the guy who did those weird ''TomAndJerry'' shorts) produce a 11 minute film with still illustrations ([[LoopholeAbuse the deal to the rights didn't specify how long the film had to be, and that it didn't actually need to be animated.]]). Thus a film was hastily produced in 30 days and it screened once in a movie theater in Manhattan. The film was never seen since then...until 2012, when [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src it was uploaded on YouTube]].

to:

* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Long story short, a producer named Producer Bill Snyder bought the rights to make an animated feature a film based on the book. A script was written, but he wanted too much money, and thus it was never picked up and all was forgotten. However, just as the rights was about to expire the value of film rights for from J.R.R. Tolkien's stories estate on the cheap, and just before it was set to expire the popularity of Tolkien's ''LordOfTheRings'' books skyrocketed. Snyder decided to Realizing he could make a quick buck serious cash selling the rights, but he decided to get it extended. However a film had to actually make be made and released in order for that to happen. With the contract set to expire in one month, he got Gene Deitch to hastily produce a 12 minute film using still drawings and have got it finished in 30 days, which was then screened in public. Thus he had Gene Deitch (yes, a Manhattan theater on the guy who did those weird ''TomAndJerry'' shorts) produce a 11 minute film with still illustrations ([[LoopholeAbuse day the contract expired. The deal to being fulfilled, the rights didn't specify how long was extended and Snyder sold the rights for $100,000 (in 1960s money). In 2012 the film had to be, and that it didn't actually need to be animated.]]). Thus a film was hastily produced in 30 days and it screened once in a movie theater in Manhattan. The film was never seen since then...until 2012, finally resurfaced when Snyder's son [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src it was uploaded it on YouTube]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Long story short, a producer named Bill Snyder bought the rights to make an animated feature film based on the book, then abandoned it (a script was written), and then forgotten about it. However, just as the rights was about to expire the value of film rights for Tolkien's stories skyrocketed. Snyder decided to make a quick buck selling the rights, but he had to actually make a film and have it screened in public. Thus he had Gene Deitch (yes, the guy who did those weird ''TomAndJerry'' shorts) produce a 11 minute film with still illustrations ([[LoopholeAbuse the deal to the rights didn't specify how long the film had to be, and that it didn't actually need to be animated.]]). Thus a film was hastily produced in 30 days and it screened once in a movie theater in Manhattan. The film was never seen since then...until 2012, when [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src it was uploaded on YouTube]].

to:

* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Long story short, a producer named Bill Snyder bought the rights to make an animated feature film based on the book, then abandoned it (a book. A script was written), written, but he wanted too much money, and then forgotten about it.thus it was never picked up and all was forgotten. However, just as the rights was about to expire the value of film rights for Tolkien's stories skyrocketed. Snyder decided to make a quick buck selling the rights, but he had to actually make a film and have it screened in public. Thus he had Gene Deitch (yes, the guy who did those weird ''TomAndJerry'' shorts) produce a 11 minute film with still illustrations ([[LoopholeAbuse the deal to the rights didn't specify how long the film had to be, and that it didn't actually need to be animated.]]). Thus a film was hastily produced in 30 days and it screened once in a movie theater in Manhattan. The film was never seen since then...until 2012, when [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src it was uploaded on YouTube]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The 1966 adaptation of ''TheHobbit'' was this. Long story short, a producer named Bill Snyder bought the rights to make an animated feature film based on the book, then abandoned it (a script was written), and then forgotten about it. However, just as the rights was about to expire the value of film rights for Tolkien's stories skyrocketed. Snyder decided to make a quick buck selling the rights, but he had to actually make a film and have it screened in public. Thus he had Gene Deitch (yes, the guy who did those weird ''TomAndJerry'' shorts) produce a 11 minute film with still illustrations ([[LoopholeAbuse the deal to the rights didn't specify how long the film had to be, and that it didn't actually need to be animated.]]). Thus a film was hastily produced in 30 days and it screened once in a movie theater in Manhattan. The film was never seen since then...until 2012, when [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBnVL1Y2src it was uploaded on YouTube]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The most widely-known example is ''Flash Comics'', the title that introduced CaptainMarvel (then called Captain Thunder). ''Whiz Comics'' #2 was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.

to:

* The most widely-known example is ''Flash Comics'', the title that introduced CaptainMarvel [[{{Shazam}} Captain Marvel]] (then called Captain Thunder). ''Whiz Comics'' #2 was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TheEvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of TheEvilDead made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.

to:

* ''TheEvilDead'' ''The EvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of TheEvilDead ''The EvilDead'' made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release.

to:

* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release. The studio was given a certain number of years to make the film, and would lose the rights if no film was produced. By the term of the contract, they had to make a film. No one specified it had to be a good one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''TheEvilDead'' has the short film Within the Woods, a cut down prototype of TheEvilDead made to convince filmmakers to finance the project.

Changed: 11

Removed: 145

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The line was duplicated later on, removed the first line.



While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie.



* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made incredibly on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release.

to:

* While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made incredibly on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release.

Added: 566

Removed: 195

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most widely-known example is ''Whiz Comics'', the title that introduced CaptainMarvel. ''Whiz Comics'' #2 was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.


Added DiffLines:

!!Examples of titles that had their origin in Ashcan situations:
*The most widely-known example is ''Flash Comics'', the title that introduced CaptainMarvel (then called Captain Thunder). ''Whiz Comics'' #2 was the first actual issue; #1 was an ashcan edition and was never publicly released.
*While most prevalent in comics, other entertainment fields have done similar things, including the infamous 1994 ''Film/TheFantasticFour'' movie. The flick was made incredibly on the cheap, and never intended for wide-release.
* "Action Funnies"
* "5-Cent Comics"
* "Eerie"
----
Ironeye MOD

Changed: 42

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope renamed


A term that originated from the GoldenAge of comic books. There was a big rush to copyright as many characters and titles as possible, but the actual production time of a comic book made it a bit problematic when days or even hours mattered. The solution? Create a simple mock comic, often just a cover and some unrelated filler made up of garbage sheets, and submit it to the copyright office. The term itself comes from the fact that these comics weren't ever actually made to be distributed, often just going straight to the ashcan (period vernacular for trashcan) once they did their job.

to:

A term that originated from the GoldenAge of comic books.TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks. There was a big rush to copyright as many characters and titles as possible, but the actual production time of a comic book made it a bit problematic when days or even hours mattered. The solution? Create a simple mock comic, often just a cover and some unrelated filler made up of garbage sheets, and submit it to the copyright office. The term itself comes from the fact that these comics weren't ever actually made to be distributed, often just going straight to the ashcan (period vernacular for trashcan) once they did their job.



Starting in the DarkAge of comics, an "ashcan" copy of a comic, often black and white and limited in distribution, would sometimes be distributed as a promotional item. These comics were called "ashcans" for marketing reasons (i.e. to imply rarity and value like the Golden Age versions) but really had little to do with GoldenAge ashcans.

to:

Starting in the DarkAge of comics, an "ashcan" copy of a comic, often black and white and limited in distribution, would sometimes be distributed as a promotional item. These comics were called "ashcans" for marketing reasons (i.e. to imply rarity and value like the Golden Age versions) but really had little to do with GoldenAge [[TheGoldenAgeOfComicBooks Golden Age]] ashcans.

Top