Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Labyrinth

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Am I the only one who thinks Jennifer Connelly's acting was okay, as opposed to BadBadActing? Obviously not great, but people seem to forget that 90% of teens, and even young twenty-somethings, just don't have enough emotional resources (or even training) to do a good job even with a great director to help. This is why DawsonCasting is so prominent, and maybe a bit of a vicious cycle: Directors know that teens and twenty-year-olds are barely trained and may not be able to handle certain issues, so they cast older but more experienced actors instead, so the few times that people see an actual teenager cast as a teenager, they call it bad acting because they're used to the more in-depth and nuanced acting of older people. Connelly did a good job for her age back then, even if she understandably doesn't like watching her younger self on screen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** A bit more detail to help it make sense: If the door she indicates leads to the castle and the guard she's asking tells the truth, the other guard (the liar) would tell her it didn't lead there and the guard she asked would tell her this (no); if it didn't, he'd say it does and the guard she asked would tell her that (yes). If the door she indicates leads to the castle and the guard she's asking lies, the other guard (the truth-teller) would tell her it does but the liar she's asking would still say no (no); if it doesn't, the other guard would tell her so but the liar she's asking would say it does (yes). So no matter whether she's asking the truth-teller or the liar, she'll always get a 'no' answer if the door she's indicating leads there and a 'yes' answer if it's the other door.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I never thought of it that way before, but in light of all of the above, there ''is'' a famous fantasy story that gives us an example of how the female version of Jareth would play out: Jadis the White Queen and how she tries to seduce Edmund in ''TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe''. That's one way to look at both stories: replace surly young Edmund with flighty young Sarah, swap beautiful, dangerous witch-queen Jadis with handsome, dangerous goblin-king Jareth, focus the plot on just the two of them, and you end up with much the same coming-of-age story of a young person going to a fantasy world and being tempted by an evil ruler who they ultimately reject to save their family.

to:

*** I never thought of it that way before, but in light of all of the above, there ''is'' a famous fantasy story that gives us an example of how the female version of Jareth would play out: Jadis the White Queen and how she tries to seduce Edmund in ''TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe''.''Literature/TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe''. That's one way to look at both stories: replace surly young Edmund with flighty young Sarah, swap beautiful, dangerous witch-queen Jadis with handsome, dangerous goblin-king Jareth, focus the plot on just the two of them, and you end up with much the same coming-of-age story of a young person going to a fantasy world and being tempted by an evil ruler who they ultimately reject to save their family.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This troper was under the impression that people liked him more for his malevolent elegance, and his total control over the situation, in the same way girls fawn of [[PhantomOfTheOpera the Phantom.]] People are strange.

to:

** This troper was under the impression that people liked him more for his malevolent elegance, and his total control over the situation, in the same way girls fawn of [[PhantomOfTheOpera the Phantom.]] Theatre/{{the Phantom|OfTheOpera}}. People are strange.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I've rewatched the scene and discovered that they're both liars when it suits them, because of one obvious glaring flaw: Blue agrees with Red that there is a rule about asking only one of them. If one always tells the truth and one always lies, then neither of them should ever agree on ANYTHING. If Blue could only tell the truth, then he would tell Sarah that Red is lying and that she can ask both of them. If Blue was the liar, he'd still say Red was lying and that Sarah could ask both of them. And Blue's subsequent statement that Red always lies and Red's denial, proves the point because it was not brought on by a question from Sarah. The only way the two could agree is if they're both liars when it suits them to be. If one of them could only tell the truth and the other could only only lie(or even if they both could only lie), then all their statements lead to paradoxes. Therefore they must be liars when they please.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I'm pretty sure that was exactly the point. The pomegranate was a symbol of sexuality and fecundity, peaches (and fruit in general) are generally-speaking plant ovaries, the movie is a metaphor about Sarah's sexual awakening, so of course she falls prey to the temptation. The only issue is with it being couched in fairy-tale trappings which one would think Sarah would be savvy to, but the points below explain why she wouldn't be; in terms of symbolism it may be {{Anvilicious}} but if you're going to tell a story with that sort of plot interpretation, it's pretty much unavoidable.


Added DiffLines:

**** That is a fascinating and insightful point. Consider me both intrigued and busily contemplating literary comparison/contrast.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Of note is that while what happened after the eating of the peach was the work of another script writer, the eating itself and what led up to it was all written by Terry Jones, the man who knows literary and fairy tale motifs like the back of his hand. This twist/inversion was probably deliberate on his part.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** I think we can take it as read that if Sarah tries getting cute like that then there is a countermeasure. Look what happened when she tried being GenreSavvy and leaving herself direction marks to prevent her accidentally doubling back. You play the Labyrinth properly, or you don't play at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** You joke, but there are probably uneducated girls out there who would think that because hey, they've been having sex for years, but three months ago was the first time they'd had a peach with a worm in it...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Probably. But it might not actually be tacky and cheap from Hoggle's POV- the Labyrinth and the goblins' world being almost in some kind of fantastical MedievalStasis, plastic is a novelty, and Hoggle treats it as something rare and valuable. Jareth would know otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The sequel manga seems to support this. Toby tries climbing over a stone wall, but the wall keeps growing as he climbs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** What I took this conversation to mean was that if she kept going through the ''apparently solid wall'' - like she did to find the two paths she tried - she'd have gone straight to the castle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* How does Jareth know plastic is tacky and cheap, when Hoggle doesn't? [[FridgeBrilliance Does this prove]] the fan theory that Jareth is a kidnapped child, brought into the Underground to rule the Goblins? [[AlternativeCharacterInterpretation Or does it simply suggest]] he has had much more contact with the mortal world that the other inhabitants of the Underground?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

----> Worm: Don't go that way!
----> Sarah: What was that?
----> Worm: I said, don't go that way! NEVER go that way!
----> Sarah: Oh. Thanks!
----> Coo, if she'd kept on going down that way, she'd've gone straight to their castle.
**** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0K5T0AqVlY Here's the scene]

Added: 663

Removed: 663

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sarah made the correct choice in the end, her logic worked perfectly. She did not take the path to certain death. Yes, she fell down into the oubliette - where Jareth said she ''shouldn't be'' because it meant she was getting too close, meaning she was on the right path. She also had the opportunity to go back up to the surface, via the helping hands, but didn't - and this too was the correct choice. She reached the castle and saved Toby in the end. The subversion is that while she made the correct choice, it didn't have to ''appear'' correct to Sarah (and thus the audience) at the time, in order to reinforce the theme of not taking things for granted.


Added DiffLines:

** Sarah made the correct choice in the end, her logic worked perfectly. She did not take the path to certain death. Yes, she fell down into the oubliette - where Jareth said she ''shouldn't be'' because it meant she was getting too close, meaning she was on the right path. She also had the opportunity to go back up to the surface, via the helping hands, but didn't - and this too was the correct choice. She reached the castle and saved Toby in the end. The subversion is that while she made the correct choice, it didn't have to ''appear'' correct to Sarah (and thus the audience) at the time, in order to reinforce the theme of not taking things for granted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Sarah made the correct choice in the end, her logic worked perfectly. She did not take the path to certain death. Yes, she fell down into the oubliette - where Jareth said she ''shouldn't be'' because it meant she was getting too close, meaning she was on the right path. She also had the opportunity to go back up to the surface, via the helping hands, but didn't - and this too was the correct choice. She reached the castle and saved Toby in the end. The subversion is that while she made the correct choice, it didn't have to ''appear'' correct to Sarah (and thus the audience) at the time, in order to reinforce the theme of not taking things for granted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A bit of FridgeLogic about this puzzle: the rules of the puzzle are explained to Sarah by ''both'' of the guards.

to:

** A bit of FridgeLogic about this puzzle: the rules of the puzzle are explained to Sarah by ''both'' of the guards.



*** Sarah, of course, accepts the riddle as valid. She really should stop taking things for granted...

to:

*** Sarah, of course, accepts the riddle as valid. She really should stop taking things for granted... This was a plot point in the Yu-Gi-Oh version, where Yugi realizes that the premise is invalid and trusts neither of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***** Don't forget that Jareth himself said she shouldn't have gotten as far as the oubliette. That means he knew she was on the right path and that going to the oubliette would help her get to the castle. Even if Hoggle didn't help her, it seems Jareth knew she'd find a way to get past the oubliette once she arrived there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
change Namespace stuff, yeah


* Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. I saw the books in your room. HansChristianAndersen, [[Creator/TheBrothersGrimm Grimm]], [[Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz Oz]], you obviously know your fairy tales and myths very well. And YET, you, when transported into a magical realm, given a fruit by someone who has admittedly been working for your enemy and whose honesty is suspect, without hesitation bite into it, not thinking it might, I don't know, cause you to never be able to leave, invalidate your claim to Toby, poison you, something like that? Why not make it a [[GreekMythology pomegranate and complete the bloody metaphor]]. Really, you should not be this GenreBlind when it's obvious you've studied the genre you're somehow fallen into a story of.

to:

* Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. I saw the books in your room. HansChristianAndersen, Creator/HansChristianAndersen, [[Creator/TheBrothersGrimm Grimm]], [[Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz Oz]], you obviously know your fairy tales and myths very well. And YET, you, when transported into a magical realm, given a fruit by someone who has admittedly been working for your enemy and whose honesty is suspect, without hesitation bite into it, not thinking it might, I don't know, cause you to never be able to leave, invalidate your claim to Toby, poison you, something like that? Why not make it a [[GreekMythology pomegranate and complete the bloody metaphor]]. Really, you should not be this GenreBlind when it's obvious you've studied the genre you're somehow fallen into a story of.



** A bit of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]] about this puzzle: the rules of the puzzle are explained to Sarah by ''both'' of the guards.

to:

** A bit of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]] FridgeLogic about this puzzle: the rules of the puzzle are explained to Sarah by ''both'' of the guards.



* This is a JBM mixed with [[FridgeHorror Fridge Horror]]. Is it possible that the masquerade scene wasn’t just a dream? Jareth was there, and the masks everyone wore resembled goblins. What if that peach transported her to the castle/allowed Jareth to do it easily, as well as making her perceive everything wrong? What she thought was a ball full of masked humans was really just a room full of goblins laughing at her as she stumbled about and danced with the King. It all sounds completely nuts till you realize when she woke up she fell out of the sky. Now why would she need to be transported, especially in a direction that took her closer to the castle...

to:

* This is a JBM mixed with [[FridgeHorror Fridge Horror]].FridgeHorror. Is it possible that the masquerade scene wasn’t just a dream? Jareth was there, and the masks everyone wore resembled goblins. What if that peach transported her to the castle/allowed Jareth to do it easily, as well as making her perceive everything wrong? What she thought was a ball full of masked humans was really just a room full of goblins laughing at her as she stumbled about and danced with the King. It all sounds completely nuts till you realize when she woke up she fell out of the sky. Now why would she need to be transported, especially in a direction that took her closer to the castle...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace stuff.


* Am I the only one who thinks Jareth is completely hideous? And if so, why is nobody nearly as turned-on by your garden-variety hair metal singer?

to:

* Am I the only one who thinks Jareth is completely hideous? And if so, why is nobody nearly as turned-on by your garden-variety hair metal singer? singer?



** Actually, he's not all that looks-wise-- but as someone who IS turned on by the average garden variety hair metal singer, you have to mention that THIS particular big-haired codpiece wearer has MAGIC POWERS. And a magic kingdom. And, even for a hair metal vocalist, really tight pants.

to:

** Actually, he's not all that looks-wise-- but as someone who IS turned on by the average garden variety hair metal singer, you have to mention that THIS particular big-haired codpiece wearer has MAGIC POWERS. And a magic kingdom. And, even for a hair metal vocalist, really tight pants.



* Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. I saw the books in your room. HansChristianAndersen, [[TheBrothersGrimm Grimm]], [[Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz Oz]], you obviously know your fairy tales and myths very well. And YET, you, when transported into a magical realm, given a fruit by someone who has admittedly been working for your enemy and whose honesty is suspect, without hesitation bite into it, not thinking it might, I don't know, cause you to never be able to leave, invalidate your claim to Toby, poison you, something like that? Why not make it a [[GreekMythology pomegranate and complete the bloody metaphor]]. Really, you should not be this GenreBlind when it's obvious you've studied the genre you're somehow fallen into a story of.

to:

* Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. I saw the books in your room. HansChristianAndersen, [[TheBrothersGrimm [[Creator/TheBrothersGrimm Grimm]], [[Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz Oz]], you obviously know your fairy tales and myths very well. And YET, you, when transported into a magical realm, given a fruit by someone who has admittedly been working for your enemy and whose honesty is suspect, without hesitation bite into it, not thinking it might, I don't know, cause you to never be able to leave, invalidate your claim to Toby, poison you, something like that? Why not make it a [[GreekMythology pomegranate and complete the bloody metaphor]]. Really, you should not be this GenreBlind when it's obvious you've studied the genre you're somehow fallen into a story of.



** [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation You think she really wanted to leave?]]

to:

** [[AlternateCharacterInterpretation You think she really wanted to leave?]] leave?]]



**** Maybe. I've seen her door choice argued both ways ... after all, if not for Hoggle she would have likely died/been trapped (until 'rescued' by Jareth) in the Oubliette.

to:

**** Maybe. I've seen her door choice argued both ways ... after all, if not for Hoggle she would have likely died/been trapped (until 'rescued' by Jareth) in the Oubliette.



* Some serious fridge logic here: How does Sarah figure that Toby, who is apparently not quite at the age where he can walk, let alone climb, got her teddy bear down from her weird nook thing on the wall? Or is her melodramatic "He's been in my room again!" some weird, coded way of rationalizing her anger at "My parents are letting my kid sibling play with my toys!"?

to:

* Some serious fridge logic here: How does Sarah figure that Toby, who is apparently not quite at the age where he can walk, let alone climb, got her teddy bear down from her weird nook thing on the wall? Or is her melodramatic "He's been in my room again!" some weird, coded way of rationalizing her anger at "My parents are letting my kid sibling play with my toys!"? toys!"?



** Oh, that makes much more sense. Thank you.

to:

** Oh, that makes much more sense. Thank you.



** Well, most people keep it up because they find it [[RuleOfFunny funny]]. (And really, it's ephebophilia, because Sarah's at least past puberty. [[{{Squick}} Um, I hope.]]) If you want someone to have a serious discussion about all the story symbolism and putting-away-of-childish-things and metaphor for adolescence, you'll have to get people to shut up first with all the "Crotch! Crotch! Scary puppets! 80's hair!"

to:

** Well, most people keep it up because they find it [[RuleOfFunny funny]]. (And really, it's ephebophilia, because Sarah's at least past puberty. [[{{Squick}} Um, I hope.]]) If you want someone to have a serious discussion about all the story symbolism and putting-away-of-childish-things and metaphor for adolescence, you'll have to get people to shut up first with all the "Crotch! Crotch! Scary puppets! 80's hair!" hair!"



*** It's part of [[MenAreGenericWomenAreSpecial common assumptions about gender and media.]] Men are considered the default, so stories written about male characters are considered to be appropriate for everyone; stories written about female characters are special-interest media for women. Labyrinth is a story about a girl growing up by discovering responsibility through childcare and sexuality through an older man, so of ''course'' only girls have ever seen it.
* Sarah marks the path she is following as she progresses through the Labyrinth. How will that help her to get out? The arrows should have been pointing in the direction in which she entered each point not the direction she left. Duh.

to:

*** It's part of [[MenAreGenericWomenAreSpecial common assumptions about gender and media.]] Men are considered the default, so stories written about male characters are considered to be appropriate for everyone; stories written about female characters are special-interest media for women. Labyrinth is a story about a girl growing up by discovering responsibility through childcare and sexuality through an older man, so of ''course'' only girls have ever seen it.
it.
* Sarah marks the path she is following as she progresses through the Labyrinth. How will that help her to get out? The arrows should have been pointing in the direction in which she entered each point not the direction she left. Duh.



*** I have NEVER understood that scene, or how the question she asks gets the right answer. I can't make it work out in my head.

to:

*** I have NEVER understood that scene, or how the question she asks gets the right answer. I can't make it work out in my head.



** Well, if you remember, Jareth had sent out the crystal bubbles; perhaps they were sent out to capture her once the peach incapacitated her. So who is to say she wasn't magically transported into the crystal while she dreamed? Also, if you watch the following scene where the goblin soldier comes in to tell Jareth that Sarah was entering the Goblin City, Jareth didn't really seem to know what was going on. I think he had been confident that the peach would knock her out for the rest of her time there. He seemed rather surprised about the whole thing.

to:

** Well, if you remember, Jareth had sent out the crystal bubbles; perhaps they were sent out to capture her once the peach incapacitated her. So who is to say she wasn't magically transported into the crystal while she dreamed? Also, if you watch the following scene where the goblin soldier comes in to tell Jareth that Sarah was entering the Goblin City, Jareth didn't really seem to know what was going on. I think he had been confident that the peach would knock her out for the rest of her time there. He seemed rather surprised about the whole thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** I always guessed that because I'm a male and straight I just never gave Jareth's tights any thought, because I didn't until I watched NostalgiaChick's review. I do kind of find it irritating that people regard that as the most memorable part of the movie. And that it's a movie only girls should be into for that matter.

to:

** I always guessed that because I'm a male and straight I just never gave Jareth's tights any thought, because I didn't until I watched NostalgiaChick's WebVideo/TheNostalgiaChick's review. I do kind of find it irritating that people regard that as the most memorable part of the movie. And that it's a movie only girls should be into for that matter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It's part of [[MenAreGenericWomenAreSpecial common assumptions about gender and media.]] Men are considered the default, so stories written about male characters are considered to be appropriate for everyone; stories written about female characters are special-interest media for women. Labyrinth is a story about a girl growing up by discovering responsibility through childcare and sexuality through an older man, so of ''course'' only girls have ever seen it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A bit of [[FridgeLogic Fridge Logic]] about this puzzle: the rules of the puzzle are explained to Sarah by ''both'' of the guards.
-->RED: No, you can't ask us, you can only ask one of us.
-->BLUE: Mm-hm. It's in the rules. And I should warn you that one of us always tells the truth and one of us always lies.
*** Sarah, of course, accepts the riddle as valid. She really should stop taking things for granted...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It's a classic solution to the puzzle, although Sarah's wording is perhaps a little more convoluted than it needs to be. What it works out to is that, by asking one guard what the other one would say, she is getting a yes/no answer that she ''knows'' is false, because either the guard she's asking is lying (and the other guard would have told the truth) or the other guard would lie (and the guard she's asking will relay the lie to her honestly).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***I have NEVER understood that scene, or how the question she asks gets the right answer. I can't make it work out in my head.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** Also, assuming it's a real fantasy world, Jareth seems compelled to offer Sarah a legitimate chance to solve the labyrinth and save Toby, the way that the fair folk usually have to keep their word in a contest. He can meddle in her adventure as much as he likes, but he can't just run her through with a sword, or bolt all the gates tight and call it a day. Since he can't make the game unwinnable, the left path really might be an easy solution that Sarah missed (though I do like the idea that it would have led "straight to the castle" via the goblin training camps).

to:

**** Also, assuming it's a real fantasy world, Jareth seems to be compelled to offer Sarah a legitimate chance to solve the labyrinth and save Toby, the way that the fair folk TheFairFolk usually have to keep their word in a contest.contest with mortals. He can meddle in her adventure as much as he likes, but he can't just run her through with a sword, or bolt all the gates tight and call it a day. Since he can't has to make the game unwinnable, winnable, the left path really might be have been an easy solution that Sarah just missed out on (though I do like the idea that it would have led "straight to the castle" via the goblin training camps).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Also, assuming it's a real fantasy world, Jareth seems compelled to offer Sarah a legitimate chance to solve the labyrinth and save Toby, the way that the fair folk usually have to keep their word in a contest. He can meddle in her adventure as much as he likes, but he can't just run her through with a sword, or bolt all the gates tight and call it a day. Since he can't make the game unwinnable, the left path really might be an easy solution that Sarah missed (though I do like the idea that it would have led "straight to the castle" via the goblin training camps).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


***** But the oubliette was a separate choice: she chose down. Had she chosen up, she presumably would have been on the right path. And as said, even the oubliette did eventually lead her safely to the center.

to:

***** But the oubliette was a separate choice: she chose down. Had she chosen up, she presumably would have been on the right path. And as said, even the oubliette did eventually lead her safely to the center.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I think that's the key to it. The stories where the fruit's dangerous usually have a rather obvious antagonist offering the fruit: Hades himself, the snake, a creepy old woman and so on. Hoggle seemed to have proven himself as a loyal friend, so he wasn't on her GenreSavvy radar the way Jareth himself showing up with a peach would have been. The situation's more akin to one the seven dwarves giving Snow White an apple, or Hermes offering Persephone a pomegranate in the midst of their escape. It's a cruel twist in the usual fairy tale motif that would've been obvious if Hoggle hadn't already earned her trust.

to:

*** I think that's That's the key to it. The stories where the fruit's dangerous usually have a rather obvious antagonist offering the fruit: Hades himself, the snake, a creepy old woman and so on. Hoggle seemed to have proven himself as a loyal friend, so he wasn't on her GenreSavvy radar the way Jareth himself showing up with a peach would have been. The situation's more akin to one the seven dwarves giving Snow White an apple, or Hermes offering Persephone a pomegranate in the midst of their escape. It's a cruel twist in the usual fairy tale motif that would've been obvious if Hoggle hadn't already earned her trust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I think that's the key to it. The stories where the fruit's dangerous usually have a rather obvious antagonist offering the fruit: Hades himself, the snake, a creepy old woman and so on. Hoggle seemed to have proven himself as a loyal friend, so he wasn't on her GenreSavvy radar the way Jareth himself showing up with a peach would have been. The situation's more akin to one the seven dwarves giving Snow White an apple, or Hermes offering Persephone a pomegranate in the midst of their escape. It's a cruel twist in the usual fairy tale motif that would've only been obvious if she knew that Hoggle was on Jareth's side.

to:

*** I think that's the key to it. The stories where the fruit's dangerous usually have a rather obvious antagonist offering the fruit: Hades himself, the snake, a creepy old woman and so on. Hoggle seemed to have proven himself as a loyal friend, so he wasn't on her GenreSavvy radar the way Jareth himself showing up with a peach would have been. The situation's more akin to one the seven dwarves giving Snow White an apple, or Hermes offering Persephone a pomegranate in the midst of their escape. It's a cruel twist in the usual fairy tale motif that would've only been obvious if she knew that Hoggle was on Jareth's side.hadn't already earned her trust.

Top