Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / Elizabeth

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup


* HeroesWantRedheads: Well being queen obviously has a lot to do with it as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is, the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign (actually more people than UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition in all of its history).

to:

** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is, the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 at least people put to death during his reign (actually more people than UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition in all of its history).history)- in fact, he routinely executed more people per year than Mary did in her entire reign.

Added: 1235

Changed: 806

Removed: 83

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Followed by a 2007 sequel, ''Elizabeth: The Golden Age'' with the same director and Cate Blanchett once again as the Virgin Queen.

to:

Followed by a 2007 sequel, ''Elizabeth: The Golden Age'' with the same director and Cate Blanchett once again as the Virgin Queen.
Queen. It adds Creator/CliveOwen as Sir Walter Raleigh and Creator/JordiMolla as the evil UsefulNotes/PhilipII of Spain.



* AdaptationDyeJob: Philip II of Spain was blond in real life. In the film he's dark and swarthy.
* AgeLift: Sir William Cecil, as noted under ArtisticLicenseHistory, was only 13 years older than Elizabeth. In the film he's in his fifties at least. On the flip side, Kat Ashley was much older than Elizabeth (31 years older, having acted as her governess and a surrogate mother since Elizabeth was 4 years old). Here she's portrayed to be similar in age to her.

to:

* AdaptationDyeJob: Philip II of Spain was dark blond in real life. In the film he's dark and swarthy.black-haired.
* AgeLift: AgeLift:
**
Sir William Cecil, as noted under ArtisticLicenseHistory, was only 13 years older than Elizabeth. In the film he's in his fifties at least. On the flip side, Kat Ashley was much older than Elizabeth (31 years older, having acted as her governess and a surrogate mother since Elizabeth was 4 years old). Here she's portrayed to be similar in age to her.



** An extreme case with Philip II, who was 61 at the point the film is set, while his actor Creator/JordiMolla was only 39 while shooting the film and looks even younger.
** Isabella Clara Eugenia of Austria was 21, but is played by a child.



* ArtisticLicenseMedicine: UsefulNotes/PhilipII's puppet-like gait might be the film's way to portray the gout that plagued his last years. If this is the case, it should be noted gout causes painfully swollen joints, while the film depicts rather a person with musculoskeletally-challenged but otherwise healthy legs.



* BadassPreacher: Catholic priests are apparently all trained assassins in the 16th century.

to:

* BadassPreacher: Catholic priests are apparently all trained assassins in the 16th century.



* EvilJesuit: The Jesuits in the film are portrayed as brutal assassins sent to murder Elizabeth.

to:

* EvilJesuit: The Jesuits in the film films are portrayed as brutal assassins sent to murder Elizabeth.



** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is, the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.

to:

** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is, the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.reign (actually more people than UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition in all of its history).



** Philip II was an elegant, physically fit man who only struggled to walk late in his life due to gout, but the film has Jordi Mollà playing him with deformed, rickety-looking legs.



** The sequel basically portrays 16th Century Spain ''as a whole'' in the same way. In addition to making Jesuits assassins. Not much mention is made of English privateers like Sir Francis Drake raiding Spanish ships and colonies, and no mention is made of Robert Dudley's military campaign in the Netherlands, two of the main motives for the Spanish campaign. The portrayal of Philip II is pretty much in keeping with traditionalist and biased Anglo-American histories, rather than more balanced modern ones.

to:

** The sequel basically portrays 16th Century Spain ''as a whole'' in the same way. In way, in addition to making Jesuits assassins. Not much mention is made of English privateers like Sir Francis Drake raiding Spanish ships and colonies, and no mention is made of Robert Dudley's military campaign in the Netherlands, two of the main motives for the Spanish campaign. The portrayal of Philip II is pretty much in keeping with traditionalist and biased Anglo-American histories, rather than more balanced modern ones.



* SinisterMinister: John Ballard.
** And any other Catholic priest come to that.

to:

* SinisterMinister: John Ballard.
** And
Ballard and any other Catholic priest come to that.



* TakeALevelInBadass: Elizabeth. From condemned, helpless princess to iron-fisted queen of England in the space of under two screen hours.
** The actual time span was 20 years.

to:

* TakeALevelInBadass: Elizabeth. From condemned, helpless princess to iron-fisted queen of England in the space of under two screen hours.
**
hours.The actual time span was 20 years.



* {{Troll}}: Walsingham is quite clearly doing this, when he unlocks the prominent Catholic men he's shut away so they wouldn't strengthen opposition:

to:

* {{Troll}}: {{Troll}}:
**
Walsingham is quite clearly doing this, when he unlocks the prominent Catholic men he's shut away so they wouldn't strengthen opposition:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalRelationshipOverhaul:
** William Cecil was not even 40 by the time Elizabeth came to the throne, and she did not retire him by making him Lord Burghley: she ennobled him as a reward for his services and he remained her most loyal advisor until his death a few years before the queen's. Similarly, Francis Walsingham was only a few years older than Elizabeth. In the second film, Elizabeth visits him when he is dying. In real life she simply let him die in poverty and didn't go to see him.
** Henri of Anjou was probably not a crossdresser and he wasn't homosexual -- the number of his ''female'' mistresses is almost uncountable; in addition, he and Elizabeth never met.
*** Also, Marie of Guise died of dropsy (in June 1560, after realizing she had it the previous ''April'') rather than foul play by Francis Walsingham; this was confirmed by autopsy the day after her death. It is highly unlikely that the two of them were in a sexual relationship.
*** Nor was Marie of Guise his aunt, or related to him by blood -- her daughter [[UsefulNotes/MaryOfScotland Mary I of Scotland]] was married to Henri's eldest brother, Francis II of France (married from 1558 until his death in 1560 -- ''childless'', in fact); in fact, Henri's family, the House of Valois, were long-time rivals with Mary's House of Guise, and Henri never even ''met'' Marie of Guise in his lifetime.
*** He is also a CompositeCharacter: in RealLife, Elizabeth's French suitor was his ''younger brother'', Hercule Francis, who ''became'' Duke of Anjou -- but not until 1576. Henri became King Henri III of France after their brother, Charles IX died in 1574, and the duchy of Anjou went to Francis as a result. He courted Elizabeth in 1579, when he was 24 and she 46 (and still capable of bearing children). Although this didn't pan out due to the complex politics of the time (and fear that Elizabeth would be at risk if she tried to bear children at her age), she was by all accounts genuinely fond of him despite the age gap, and the match was given far more serious consideration than the film depicts (even reaching an actual betrothal at one point).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* TheWomanWearingTheQueenlyMask: Pretty much TheMovie.

Added: 171

Changed: 53

Removed: 231

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Disambiguated


%%[[caption-width-right:350:some caption text]]

to:

%%[[caption-width-right:350:some caption text]]



* CostumePorn: Holy hell, yes.
* DaddysGirl: Elizabeth appears to be one.
** Queen Mary also appears to have been one.

to:

* %%* CostumePorn: Holy hell, yes.
* %%* DaddysGirl: Elizabeth appears to be one.
** %%** Queen Mary also appears to have been one.



* DeathBySex: [[spoiler: Isabelle Knollys]] dies while doing it with Lord Robert. Played with in that [[spoiler: her dress was poisoned]] and she would have died anyway.



** Averted with the French Ambassador, played by Eric Cantona.


Added DiffLines:

* OutWithABang: [[spoiler: Isabelle Knollys]] dies while doing it with Lord Robert. Played with in that [[spoiler: her dress was poisoned]] and she would have died anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Queen Mary also appears to have been one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fanservice: Quite a lot of nudity and sex scenes. One notable example is when Norfolk has sex with his mistress before getting arrested.

to:

* Fanservice: {{Fanservice}}: Quite a lot of nudity and sex scenes. One notable example is when the duke of Norfolk has sex with his mistress lover, Lettice Howard, before getting arrested.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Fanservice: Quite a lot of nudity and sex scenes. One notable example is when Norfolk has sex with his mistress before getting arrested.

Added: 281

Changed: 315

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A 1998 {{Biopic}} of the early life of Queen UsefulNotes/ElizabethI of England starring Creator/CateBlanchett in the title role. It broke the usual "period piece" mould of English biographical pictures in that it was directed by an Indian, Creator/ShekharKapur, took a much more dramatic style of storytelling, and didn't shy away from ''some'' historical truths of the era, such as dirt, poverty, and torture.

to:

A 1998 British {{Biopic}} of about the early life of Queen UsefulNotes/ElizabethI of England England, starring Creator/CateBlanchett in the title role. role along with Creator/GeoffreyRush, Creator/ChristopherEccleston, Creator/JosephFiennes, Creator/JohnGielgud, and Creator/RichardAttenborough.

It broke the usual "period piece" mould of English biographical pictures in that it was directed by an Indian, Creator/ShekharKapur, took a much more dramatic style of storytelling, and didn't shy away from ''some'' historical truths of the era, such as dirt, poverty, and torture.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
cut trope


* RapunzelHair: One of Cate Blanchett's more remembered roles with hair like this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SparingTheFinalMook: After the disastrous battle, Mary finds a single young English soldier alive on the battlefield. Rather than having him killed off, she spares him, largely so he can [[SpareAMessenger act as a messenger about the outcome]].

Added: 546

Removed: 259

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswick


** Inverted with Sir William Cecil who is aged up considerably (in reality he was almost exactly 13 years her senior; Creator/RichardAttenborough was nearly ''46'' years Cate Blanchett's). Ditto for Philip II of Spain who was blond and handsome in real life.


Added DiffLines:

* HistoricalUglinessUpdate:
** Mary Tudor is portrayed as fat whereas in real-life, Mary was a rail-thin waif who made even the svelte Elizabeth look plump. The likely historical source of this portrayal is her infamous "phantom pregnancy" where her thin abdomen expanded to give the impression that she was pregnant.
** Sir William Cecil is aged up considerably and looks far weathered compared to portraits of him made at the time (in reality he was almost exactly 13 years her senior; Richard Attenborough was nearly 46 years Cate Blanchett's).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LadyOfWar: Elizabeth wears armor and gives a RousingSpeech to her troops in the sequel (but she did not dress up like a [[UsefulNotes/JoanOfArc French saint]], especially as that one was long demonized by the English) .

to:

* LadyOfWar: Elizabeth wears armor and gives a RousingSpeech to her troops in the sequel (but she did not dress up like a [[UsefulNotes/JoanOfArc French saint]], especially as that one was long demonized by the English) .English).



* PimpedOutCape: Elizabeth's [[GoldMakesEverythingShiny gold]] and [[PrettyInMink ermine]] coronation cape. She actually breaths a sign of relief when it's taken off and the weight is off her.

to:

* PimpedOutCape: Elizabeth's [[GoldMakesEverythingShiny gold]] and [[PrettyInMink ermine]] coronation cape. She actually breaths breathes a sign sigh of relief when it's taken off and the weight is off her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:300:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Elizabeth-1998-movie-poster-elizabeth-3345038-500-656_5167.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:300:https://static.[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Elizabeth-1998-movie-poster-elizabeth-3345038-500-656_5167.jpg]]
org/pmwiki/pub/images/elizabeth_9.jpg]]
%%[[caption-width-right:350:some caption text]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise - whom we are told is plotting to invade England - because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots. Elizabeth had also had ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland. They were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.

to:

** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise - whom who we are told is plotting to invade England - because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots. Elizabeth had also had ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland. They were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[spoiler: Robert Dudley]] is actually villainised by this, with his conversion to Catholicism being treated as his StartOfDarkness and eventual betrayal of Elizabeth. In point of fact, he would have been outraged by this portrayal as not only did he ''never'' betray Elizabeth, he was a staunch Protestant and Puritan all his life.

to:

** [[spoiler: Robert Dudley]] is actually villainised by this, with his conversion to Catholicism being treated as his StartOfDarkness and eventual betrayal of Elizabeth. In point of fact, he would have been outraged by this portrayal portrayal, as not only did he ''never'' betray Elizabeth, he was a staunch Protestant and Puritan all his life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.

to:

** A subtle one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is is, the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A subtle and arguable one with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.

to:

** A subtle and arguable one is with Elizabeth and Walsingham kneeling under a gigantic portrait of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII and wondering what he, her father, would have done, and if she'd ever live up to his reputation. That is the reputation of the man who had her mother beheaded so he could marry somebody else, routinely executed his closest advisers and allies, and possibly had as many as 10,000 people put to death during his reign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Duke of Norfolk was actually just a naive and gullible co-conspirator in a couple of plots, the first of which was only to marry UsefulNotes/MaryOfScotland, which alone was enough to get him jailed for a time (the second was to replace Elizabeth, which of course got his head the chop). He was not the cold and calculating power-hungry mastermind portrayed in the movie.
** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise - whom we are told is plotting to invade England - because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots. Almost ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops had already been thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland. They were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.

to:

** The Duke of Norfolk was actually just a naive and gullible co-conspirator in a couple of plots, the first of which was only to marry UsefulNotes/MaryOfScotland, which alone was enough to get him jailed for a time (the second time. The second, the Ridolfi plot, was to replace Elizabeth, which of course was what got his head the chop).him executed. He was not the cold and calculating power-hungry mastermind portrayed in the movie.
** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise - whom we are told is plotting to invade England - because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots. Almost Elizabeth had also had ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops had already been thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland. They were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The sequel basically portrays 16th Century Spain ''as a whole'' in the same way. In addition to making Jesuits assassins. Not much mention of English privateers raiding Spanish ships and colonies, one of the main motives for the Spanish campaign. The portrayal of Philip II is pretty much in keeping with traditionalist and biased Anglo-American histories, rather than more balanced modern ones.

to:

** The sequel basically portrays 16th Century Spain ''as a whole'' in the same way. In addition to making Jesuits assassins. Not much mention is made of English privateers like Sir Francis Drake raiding Spanish ships and colonies, one and no mention is made of Robert Dudley's military campaign in the Netherlands, two of the main motives for the Spanish campaign. The portrayal of Philip II is pretty much in keeping with traditionalist and biased Anglo-American histories, rather than more balanced modern ones.

Added: 112

Removed: 116

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* TheMole: Walsingham's assistant Thomas Elyot. Sadly, Father Creator/DanielCraig beat him to death with a rock.



* ReverseMole: Walsingham's assistant Thomas Elyot. Sadly, Father Creator/DanielCraig beat him to death with a rock.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise- whom we are told is plotting to invade England- because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots; almost ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops had already been thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland- these soldiers were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.

to:

** In the film, England is forced to send young and untrained soldiers, including children, to fight in Scotland against the French Queen Regent Mary of Guise- Guise - whom we are told is plotting to invade England- England - because the Catholic Bishops spoke in the pulpits against raising a professional army. In truth, Mary of Guise was not planning on invading England, but was crushing a Protestant revolt amongst the Scots; almost Scots. Almost ''all'' the English Catholic Bishops had already been thrown in prison before the conflict even began, and the English actually ''did'' send professional soldiers to fight in Scotland- these soldiers Scotland. They were defeated in battle not because they were untrained children but because they were simply out-played by the French. It is basically just nationalistic propaganda to suggest that the English armies only lost because they were sabotaged by traitorous Catholic clergy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Latino Is Brown has been tightened to refer to when all Latinos are brown, or when someone thinks they are. Single-character examples fit in Phenotype Stereotype and Averted Trope examples should not be listed unless notable.


* AdaptationDyeJob: Philip II of Spain was blond in real life. In the film he's dark and swarthy. A European variant of LatinoIsBrown.

to:

* AdaptationDyeJob: Philip II of Spain was blond in real life. In the film he's dark and swarthy. A European variant of LatinoIsBrown.

Top