[002]
UnclePhil
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This is an odd scale to try to make.
to:
This is an odd scale to try to make. \"Predator\" is more violent than \"Saving Private Ryan\"? Are you serious? And rape is by default two levels more violent than killing? You can make a certain argument for either of those but a consensus would be awfully tough. Anyway, if \"Predator\" is a 10 then I guess some of the Saw/Hostel movies qualify at around a 13 and the Japanese gorn flick \"Grotesque\" has got to be a 15.
I\'m saying this as someone who argued a couple years ago that the mass-deletion of \"Gorn\" examples was a bad move for the sake of, among other people, horror FX hobbyists like myself. Despite that, and despite having an immediate hope that this idea might be a reasonable substitute, I\'ve read over this new page and it\'s actually really subjective and arbitrary in practice, in both the selection and the application of the criteria.
I\'m saying this as someone who argued a couple years ago that the mass-deletion of \"Gorn\" examples was a bad move for the sake of, among other people, horror FX hobbyists like myself. Despite that, and despite having an immediate hope that this idea might be a reasonable substitute, I\'ve read over this new page and it\'s actually really subjective and arbitrary in practice, in both the selection and the application of the criteria.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
First of all, you should know I haven\'t read the comic. Second, apologies for adding it back once. I didn\'t know what \
to:
First of all, you should know I haven\\\'t read the comic. Second, apologies for adding it back once. I didn\\\'t know that the examples must be taken to discussion before that.
I\\\'ll get to my point. Read back the banner at the top of the SBIH page. It asks to \\\"please keep off the page examples that are subjective\\\", and this one IS subjective. Isn\\\'t that reason enough for it not to be here?
I\\\'ll get to my point. Read back the banner at the top of the SBIH page. It asks to \\\"please keep off the page examples that are subjective\\\", and this one IS subjective. Isn\\\'t that reason enough for it not to be here?
