Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / GunnerkriggCourt

Go To

[006] VAIAZ Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is it still too early to put \
to:
Is it still too early to put \\\"Fantastic 4\\\" and \\\"Left Behind (2015)\\\" on this list?
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As to dealing with Ysengrin and Coyote being part of her job...sounds like a perfect reason to seek other employment. If she\'s under their protection then why did Coyote let Ysengrin try to kill her? That\'s a rhetorical question, because Tom already answered it. Coyote has only one reason to ever do anything: His own amusement. If your boss is willing to let you die to amuse himself then that is what we, in Tvtropes parlance, call a BadBoss. And no, \
to:
As to dealing with Ysengrin and Coyote being part of her job...sounds like a perfect reason to seek other employment. If she\\\'s under their protection then why did Coyote let Ysengrin try to kill her? That\\\'s a rhetorical question, because Tom already answered it. Coyote has only one reason to ever do anything: His own amusement. If your boss is willing to let you die to amuse himself then that is what we, in Tvtropes parlance, call a BadBoss. And no, \\\"He knew she would be saved\\\" is not a valid reason to let your employee try to kill another of your employees. And speaking of which, what, exactly, is stopping Ysengrin from going apeshit again?

I don\\\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his decision to do so is legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his decision is legitimate.

As to regressing psychologically etc, again, her failing not his and again, even accepting that his actions constitute abuse that does not mean that he is doing so for the sake of doing so. It is an unfortunate by-product of his actions, all of which are perfectly reasonable in principle, even if their delivery leaves much to be desired, which, again, should be noted.

I\\\'ve heard this whole spiel from the others. You\\\'re not really providing any new argument, just rehashing old ones.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
As to dealing with Ysengrin and Coyote being part of her job...sounds like a perfect reason to seek other employment. If she\'s under their protection then why did Coyote let Ysengrin try to kill her? That\'s a rhetorical question, because Tom already answered it. Coyote has only one reason to ever do anything: His own amusement. If your boss is willing to let you die to amuse himself then that is what we, in Tvtropes parlance, call a BadBoss. And what, exactly, is stopping Ysengrin from going apeshit again?
to:
As to dealing with Ysengrin and Coyote being part of her job...sounds like a perfect reason to seek other employment. If she\\\'s under their protection then why did Coyote let Ysengrin try to kill her? That\\\'s a rhetorical question, because Tom already answered it. Coyote has only one reason to ever do anything: His own amusement. If your boss is willing to let you die to amuse himself then that is what we, in Tvtropes parlance, call a BadBoss. And no, \\\"He kne she ould be saved\\\" is not a valid reason to let your employee try to kill another of your employees. And speaking of which, what, exactly, is stopping Ysengrin from going apeshit again?
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I don\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his actions are legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his decision is legitimate.
to:
I don\\\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his decision to do so is legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his decision is legitimate.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
As to regressing psychologically etc, again, her failing not his and again, even accepting that his actions constitute abuse that does not mean that he is doing so for the sake of doing so. It is an unfortunate by-product of his actions, all of which are perfectly reasonable in principle, even if their delivery leaves much to be desired.
to:
As to regressing psychologically etc, again, her failing not his and again, even accepting that his actions constitute abuse that does not mean that he is doing so for the sake of doing so. It is an unfortunate by-product of his actions, all of which are perfectly reasonable in principle, even if their delivery leaves much to be desired, which, again, should be noted.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I don\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his actions are legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his...I don\'t think \
to:
I don\\\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his actions are legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his decision is legitimate.

As to regressing psychologically etc, again, her failing not his and again, even accepting that his actions constitute abuse that does not mean that he is doing so for the sake of doing so. It is an unfortunate by-product of his actions, all of which are perfectly reasonable in principle, even if their delivery leaves much to be desired.

I\\\'ve heard this whole spiel from the others. You\\\'re not really providing any new argument, just rehashing old ones.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I don\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his actions are legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his actions are legitimate.
to:
I don\\\'t need a reason to believe he would be more responsible in controlling Renard than Annie for me to argue that his actions are legitimate and not designed to screw over Annie for the sake of screwing over Annie. If Anthony believes he would be more responsible, then his...I don\\\'t think \\\"actions\\\" is the right word. Reasoning? Basis for making that decision... something like that...anyway, then his placeholder is legitimate.
Top