[004]
77.234.43.180
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
In addition, your definition isn\'t \
to:
In addition, your definition isn\\\'t \\\"what we call forgiveness\\\", it is what we call amoral opportunism.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, put yourself in the position of somebody watching a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport, which happened to be your own friends and family, that he didn\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse, and remained much the same afterwards, while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with? Personally I reserve it for after the karmic scales have been balanced, and if said person felt genuinely sorry.
to:
Well, put yourself in the position of somebody watching a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport, which happened to be your own friends and family, that he didn\\\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse, and remained much the same afterwards, while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with? Personally I reserve it for after the karmic scales have been balanced, and if said person felt genuinely sorry.
In addition, your definition isn\\\'t \\\"what we call forgiveness\\\", it is what we call amoral opportunism.
In addition, your definition isn\\\'t \\\"what we call forgiveness\\\", it is what we call amoral opportunism.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, put yourself in the position of somebody watching a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport, who happened to be your own friends and family, that he didn\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse, and remained much the same afterwards, while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with? Personally I reserve it for after the karmic scales have been balanced, and if said person felt genuinely sorry.
to:
Well, put yourself in the position of somebody watching a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport, which happened to be your own friends and family, that he didn\\\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse, and remained much the same afterwards, while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with? Personally I reserve it for after the karmic scales have been balanced, and if said person felt genuinely sorry.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, put yourself in the position of a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport that happened to be your own friends and family, didn\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse and remained much the same while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with?
to:
Well, put yourself in the position of somebody watching a sentient talking being gleefully eating alive other sentient talking creatures for sport, who happened to be your own friends and family, that he didn\\\'t feel the slightest bit of remorse, and remained much the same afterwards, while never ever being legally punished for his crimes. Would you consider him worthy of forgiveness without legal punishment to start with? Personally I reserve it for after the karmic scales have been balanced, and if said person felt genuinely sorry.
