[002]
75.3.201.58
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
ninja\'d: Plus, both varieties (mitsu and played straight) have been referred to in songs by various bands. Nor is it an NRLEP violation as it doesn\'t name anyone specific. It would be an NRLEP violation had it said \
to:
Point being that mitsu (the gender-inverted version) should stay as the trope, even if we can\\\'t mention the much less frequent \\\"man gets taken for all he has.\\\" Not seeking edit war or to promote misogyny, just wanting to clarify that the trope wasn\\\'t listed for woman hating reasons.
ninja\\\'d: Plus, both varieties (mitsu and played straight) have been referred to in songs by various bands. Nor is it an NRLEP violation as it doesn\\\'t name anyone specific. It would be an NRLEP violation had it said \\\"[[FakeBand Hairs\\\'Prayers]] is an example of this, they do mitsu to survive as a band\\\" or mentioned the Kaori/Toshi case, but it didn\\\'t...
ninja\\\'d: Plus, both varieties (mitsu and played straight) have been referred to in songs by various bands. Nor is it an NRLEP violation as it doesn\\\'t name anyone specific. It would be an NRLEP violation had it said \\\"[[FakeBand Hairs\\\'Prayers]] is an example of this, they do mitsu to survive as a band\\\" or mentioned the Kaori/Toshi case, but it didn\\\'t...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Point being that mitsu (the gender-inverted version) should stay as the trope, even if we can\'t mention the much less frequent \
to:
ninja\\\'d: Plus, both varieties (mitsu and played straight) have been referred to in songs by various bands. Nor is it an NRLEP violation as it doesn\\\'t name anyone specific. It would be an NRLEP violation had it said \\\"[[FakeBand Hairs\\\'Prayers]] is an example of this, they do mitsu to survive as a band\\\" or mentioned the Kaori/Toshi case, but it didn\\\'t...
Point being that mitsu (the gender-inverted version) should stay as the trope, even if we can\\\'t mention the much less frequent \\\"man gets taken for all he has.\\\" Not seeking edit war or to promote misogyny, just wanting to clarify that the trope wasn\\\'t listed for woman hating reasons.
Point being that mitsu (the gender-inverted version) should stay as the trope, even if we can\\\'t mention the much less frequent \\\"man gets taken for all he has.\\\" Not seeking edit war or to promote misogyny, just wanting to clarify that the trope wasn\\\'t listed for woman hating reasons.
