[001]
83.248.33.31
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
to:
As this is an Administrivia/ page, I don\\\'t want to alter content without asking first, so here goes:
* A few weeks ago someone pointed out that just putting \\\"Natch\\\" as the description is very common; unless the list is felt to grow too long, should this be added?
* The \\\"[Name], and HOW!\\\" line had a note that sarcastically replied with \\\"\\\'How\\\', indeed?\\\" that was recently removed. I personally liked the note, but putting it back would be instigating an edit war. Would it be acceptable to reinsert the note in some form or other?
* I realise that plural redirects are a big no-no on this site, but ZeroContextExample is, in my experience, almost never used in singular form. I noticed someone put up a redirect for the plural form; is it alright to use it? As I mainly proofread around here, I constantly link to this page in the edit reason box, and writing \\\"ZeroContextExample entries\\\" or \\\"ZeroContextExample s\\\" is kind of awkward.
* A few weeks ago someone pointed out that just putting \\\"Natch\\\" as the description is very common; unless the list is felt to grow too long, should this be added?
* The \\\"[Name], and HOW!\\\" line had a note that sarcastically replied with \\\"\\\'How\\\', indeed?\\\" that was recently removed. I personally liked the note, but putting it back would be instigating an edit war. Would it be acceptable to reinsert the note in some form or other?
* I realise that plural redirects are a big no-no on this site, but ZeroContextExample is, in my experience, almost never used in singular form. I noticed someone put up a redirect for the plural form; is it alright to use it? As I mainly proofread around here, I constantly link to this page in the edit reason box, and writing \\\"ZeroContextExample entries\\\" or \\\"ZeroContextExample s\\\" is kind of awkward.
