[001]
Ferrard
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Fair points, fair edits of the page. Citino\'s book (and lecture) unfortunately didn\'t go into too much fine detail after the fighting stalemated (his work is obsessively focused on maneuver warfare and operational art), so his material speaks a lot more about the initial showing of North Korean / Chinese forces and MacArthur\'s use of X Corps, and a lot less about the combined-arms positional might of the US / UN forces. After 1951, the chapter pretty much says, \
to:
Fair points, fair edits of the page. Citino\\\'s book (and lecture) unfortunately didn\\\'t go into too much fine detail after the fighting stalemated (his work is obsessively focused on maneuver warfare and operational art), so his material speaks a lot more about the initial showing of North Korean / Chinese forces and [=MacArthur\\\'s=] use of X Corps, and a lot less about the combined-arms positional might of the US / UN forces. After 1951, the chapter pretty much says, \\\"America got its s*** together and accepted a stalemate only due to political limitations,\\\" then wraps up and moves on to a huge section on the Arab-Israeli wars. Therefore, I\\\'d be greatly interested in any further details you can chip in about the post-maneuver fighting.
Anyways. High five for wiki-magic.
Anyways. High five for wiki-magic.
