Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \
to:
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \\\"Impotency Cure\\\" and \\\"High-Memory Music Player\\\" respectively. This would be a superset of titles for works, which after all are simply a subtype of new products in general.

After all, if the concern is people saying \\\"bananas are bananas\\\", then why would the InUniverse section be safe from that either?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \
to:
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \\\"Impotency Cure\\\" and \\\"High-Memory Music Player\\\" respectively. This would be a superset of titles for works, which after all are simply a subtype of new products in general.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \
to:
How about allowing it for things deliberately named via new coinages, like new commercial products, such as the viagra and iPod examples? That is, they would fit if they were called \\\"Impotency Cure\\\" and \\\"High-Memory Music Player\\\" respectively. This would be a superset of titles for works, which after all are simply a subtype of new products in general.
Top