[001]
VVK
Current Version
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
* [[http://tompreston.deviantart.com/gallery/26560917#/d4h1rx6 This comics]]. The message was supposed to be to hve more confidence in your skills and create stories you want to do, not the ones other people want you to. But it was present in such clumsy way that the message most people got, as seen on the comments on individual pages, was \'\'[[YaoiFangirl Yaoi Fangirls]] ruins everything\'\', with some small minorities getting messages like \
to:
* [[http://tompreston.deviantart.com/gallery/26560917#/d4h1rx6 This comics]]. The message was supposed to be to hve more confidence in your skills and create stories you want to do, not the ones other people want you to. But it was present in such clumsy way that the message most people got, as seen on the comments on individual pages, was \\\'\\\'[[YaoiFangirl Yaoi Fangirls]] ruins everything\\\'\\\', with some small minorities getting messages like \\\"If somebody tells you to do something the way you don\\\'t wat to, never confront them about it - just quiletly do things your way and everything will be fine\\\" or \\\"Writers are parasites, artists are only ones who understand how to make comics\\\", among the others.
Firstly, there\\\'s nothing I can see here about the medium not being able to present the aesop, and that\\\'s enough.
Second, and this is more for the record, the judgement that it was clumsily presented sounds bizarre. This trope isn\\\'t \\\"clueless readers\\\", but that\\\'s what the above sounds like, especially after my looking at the comic. As far as I\\\'m concerned, the aesop was pretty much obvious as soon as the whole \\\"I\\\'m not confident enough to write myself\\\" thing came up. All the above interpretations just sound like examples of \\\"Lots of people on the internet are lousy at reading comprehension,\\\" which isn\\\'t news. Also, comments for the whole thing that I glanced at didn\\\'t seem so confused about it.
Firstly, there\\\'s nothing I can see here about the medium not being able to present the aesop, and that\\\'s enough.
Second, and this is more for the record, the judgement that it was clumsily presented sounds bizarre. This trope isn\\\'t \\\"clueless readers\\\", but that\\\'s what the above sounds like, especially after my looking at the comic. As far as I\\\'m concerned, the aesop was pretty much obvious as soon as the whole \\\"I\\\'m not confident enough to write myself\\\" thing came up. All the above interpretations just sound like examples of \\\"Lots of people on the internet are lousy at reading comprehension,\\\" which isn\\\'t news. Also, comments for the whole thing that I glanced at didn\\\'t seem so confused about it.
