[002]
girlyboy
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Anyway, the main question is -- would it confuse enough tropers, and confuse them badly enough, that it justifies a cut despite the term being well-known on teh intertubes, and despite it resulting in \'\'a lot\'\' of red links? My gut instinct is \
to:
Anyway, the main question is -- would it confuse enough tropers, and confuse them badly enough, that it justifies a cut despite the term being well-known on teh intertubes, and despite it resulting in a bunch of red links? My gut instinct is \\\"no,\\\" or at least \\\"let\\\'s not be hasty here.\\\"
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I thought it was just a common Internet-ese acronym... :P
to:
I thought it was just a very common Internet-ese acronym... :P
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Anyway, the main question is -- would it confuse enough tropers, and confuse them badly enough, that it justifies a cut despite the term being well-known on teh intertubes, and despite it resulting in \'\'a lot\'\' of red links? My gut instinct is \
to:
Anyway, the main question is -- would it confuse enough tropers, and confuse them badly enough, that it justifies a cut despite the term being well-known on teh intertubes, and despite it resulting in \\\'\\\'a lot\\\'\\\' of red links? My gut instinct is \\\"no,\\\" or at least \\\"let\\\'s not be hasty here.\\\"
