[003]
MrDalek
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
OK, here\'s a question:
why is this page allowed to remain virtually intact, but most of the out-of-universe examples in {{Adaptation Decay}} have been removed?
After all, isn\'t this just a more extreme version of {{Adaptation Decay}}?
By the way, don\'t misunderstand me: I want this page to remain intact. But I also want the {{Adaptation Decay}} to go back the way it was because it was a fun read (I thought this site WASN\'T Wikipedia and thus valued humor over \
why is this page allowed to remain virtually intact, but most of the out-of-universe examples in {{Adaptation Decay}} have been removed?
After all, isn\'t this just a more extreme version of {{Adaptation Decay}}?
By the way, don\'t misunderstand me: I want this page to remain intact. But I also want the {{Adaptation Decay}} to go back the way it was because it was a fun read (I thought this site WASN\'T Wikipedia and thus valued humor over \
to:
...
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
why is this page allowed to remain virtually intact, but most of the out-of-universe examples in [[Adaptation Decay]] have been removed?
to:
why is this page allowed to remain virtually intact, but most of the out-of-universe examples in {{Adaptation Decay}} have been removed?
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
By the way, don\'t misunderstand me: I want this page to remain intact. But I also want the {{Adaptation Decay}} to go back the way it was because it was a fun read (I thought this site WASN\'T Wikipedia and thus valued humor over \
to:
By the way, don\\\'t misunderstand me: I want this page to remain intact. But I also want the {{Adaptation Decay}} to go back the way it was because it was a fun read (I thought this site WASN\\\'T Wikipedia and thus valued humor over \\\"facts\\\" or \\\"neutrality\\\"), and I think the reason given for the change reeks of hypocrisy since this page remains almost unchanged.
