[005]
Evilest_Tim
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \'\'lie\'\' in its current format; nothing is \'\'totally\'\' new, that\'s true, but nothing new \'\'at all\'\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. As it stands now, the second line actually contradicts the first; the first basically declares it impossible to be original, the second says there\'s a difference between being influenced and being overly derivative. How can that be, if there\'s no way for anything to be new? To settle which is true, I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. Doubt anyone\'s tried that before.
to:
I don\\\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \\\'\\\'lie\\\'\\\' in its current format; nothing is \\\'\\\'totally\\\'\\\' new, that\\\'s true, but nothing new \\\'\\\'at all\\\'\\\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. As it stands now, the second line actually contradicts the first; the first basically declares it impossible to be original, the second says there\\\'s a difference between being influenced and being overly derivative. How can that be, if there\\\'s no way for anything to be new? To settle which is true, I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. Doubt anyone\\\'s tried that before.[[hottip:*:Granted, this is because it would be really stupid, but hey]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \'\'lie\'\' in its current format; nothing is \'\'totally\'\' new, that\'s true, but nothing new \'\'at all\'\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. As it stands now, the second line actually contradicts the first; the first basically declares it impossible to be original, the second says there\'s a difference between being influenced and being overly derivative. How can that be, if there\'s no way for anything to be new? To settle which is true, I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. Doubt anyone\'s tried that before. [[Hottip:*:Because it would be stupid, admittedly]]
to:
I don\\\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \\\'\\\'lie\\\'\\\' in its current format; nothing is \\\'\\\'totally\\\'\\\' new, that\\\'s true, but nothing new \\\'\\\'at all\\\'\\\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. As it stands now, the second line actually contradicts the first; the first basically declares it impossible to be original, the second says there\\\'s a difference between being influenced and being overly derivative. How can that be, if there\\\'s no way for anything to be new? To settle which is true, I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. Doubt anyone\\\'s tried that before.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \'\'lie\'\' in its current format; nothing is \'\'totally\'\' new, that\'s true, but nothing new \'\'at all\'\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. There, entry disproved.
to:
I don\\\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \\\'\\\'lie\\\'\\\' in its current format; nothing is \\\'\\\'totally\\\'\\\' new, that\\\'s true, but nothing new \\\'\\\'at all\\\'\\\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. As it stands now, the second line actually contradicts the first; the first basically declares it impossible to be original, the second says there\\\'s a difference between being influenced and being overly derivative. How can that be, if there\\\'s no way for anything to be new? To settle which is true, I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. Doubt anyone\\\'s tried that before. [[Hottip:*:Because it would be stupid, admittedly]]
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first point is a plain and simple \'\'lie\'\' in its current format; nothing \'\'totally\'\' new, that\'s true, but nothing new \'\'at all\'\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. There, entry disproved.
to:
I don\\\'t see what you mean in the slightest. The first heading is a plain and simple \\\'\\\'lie\\\'\\\' in its current format; nothing is \\\'\\\'totally\\\'\\\' new, that\\\'s true, but nothing new \\\'\\\'at all\\\'\\\' is stretching the concept beyond a factual statement and into the realm of fanboy logic used to excuse copy-paste plotting. I can come up with something new right now: a mob drama set in 30s Chicago plotting the rise and fall of a Mafia family as they battle against a sentient earthquake. There, entry disproved.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
As for the second, the opening line is unneccessary and a fairly tiresome argument that reality is something you \'\'necessarily\'\' want to escape; the paragraph functions perfectly well without it.
to:
As for the second, the opening line adds nothing to the section other than repeating the well-worn argument that reality is tiresome and dull and thus something you \\\'\\\'necessarily\\\'\\\' want to escape; the paragraph functions perfectly well without having such a dubious claim in it.
